Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - heartbroken

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
Faith / What Good Is Grief?
« on: April 26, 2023, 11:42:43 AM »
https://proverbs31.org/read/devotions/full-post/2022/03/31/what-good-is-grief?utm_campaign=Daily%20Devotions&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=207419656&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8ComF1O98n7Bj18QR1hvJuL0hg_YE_ks9zbYjMieIYkNhp-gePqhdWjtWHRr-FGjT1VdsAMKF_p6YEKI1XtpP-GVNNiA&utm_content=207419656&utm_source=hs_email#disqus_thread

What Good Is Grief?
March 31, 2022
by Jodi Harris

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.” Matthew 5:4 (NIV)

It was early fall when I pushed my nearly empty shopping cart through my favorite superstore, grabbing a handful of groceries. I eyed the tiny, pumpkin-themed newborn clothes and the brightly colored board books, remembering days long gone when my boys were littles.  There I stood, with some coffee creamer and laundry detergent in the otherwise empty cart that somehow represented my empty heart. I wanted to scoop up all things tiny, curl up in the baby section and gently rock myself in the fetal position until someone called security. Nothing prepares a mama for the empty-nest season of life. And the superstore had no sympathy.  Ten months before, the new year had brought an unexpected move away from our two college-aged sons, and those tiny infant clothes brought fresh waves of sadness and sorrow, reminding me of grief I didn’t want to feel.  It wasn’t supposed to be this way. I wasn’t ready to let them go. And no one had told me it would hurt this bad. That first night away in the hotel, I lay in bed bawling, begging God to please let us go home. To please put my family back together. My wailing exhausted me as I settled into sleep.  The year 2020 brought loss for many, and how hopeful we were to turn the calendar page to 2021, anticipating hope of new beginnings and healing. But many of us suffered even more heartache as days rolled into months.  I don’t do grief well. I do my best to avoid pain that threatens to swallow me whole if just one tear slips down my cheek. I want to bury it deep and look on the bright side of things. To consider the goodness of God in healthy checkups, daily provisions and warm beds. But if the goodness of God dwells only in those things, why are the most joyful people I know the ones who have suffered the greatest loss?

Could loss have something to teach me about His goodness, too, if only I am willing to pause and consider this grief that gathers in my chest?

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted.” (Matthew 5:4)

Blessed?

The word “blessed” in our key verse means favored by God. Nothing about grief and loss makes me feel divinely favored. Instead, I wonder what I’ve done to deserve such pain.  And what about comfort?

I pause and reflect on the nights I’ve surrendered to my tears, allowing grief to break me open and empty me out. I’m reminded it was then that God rushed in to fill me with more of Himself.  On those nights, He picked me up and swaddled me tightly as I wept and wailed. He sang over me in my darkness while I kicked and screamed like a colicky infant who refuses sleep.  But until we surrender to the struggle, relax into rest and settle into the sovereign way of God, we cannot heal. In my season of suffering, I didn’t know this yet.  Over time, my soul softened sooner during these bouts of grief, and it was then I began to experience God’s goodness and deep comfort.  When we give space to grief, it becomes the doorway to deeper fellowship with Him, an invitation into a most holy place saturated with His love, peace and compassion. Grief awakens a hunger for heaven, where all will be made right.  And maybe most beautifully of all, grief leads us to the heart of God, where we find not only His comfort and healing but His very presence.

17
Faith / God Redeems
« on: April 26, 2023, 11:36:50 AM »
https://proverbs31.org/read/devotions/full-post/2022/03/30/god-redeems?utm_campaign=Daily%20Devotions&utm_medium=email&_hsmi=207418717&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8nE5cBlpnh8rKY7hOTgkfx9k_0AQ-erbwclEJrG5utHVIe2GHnkcZX2mh2MbNbzKVGPfRXQh6NXikD7VXjJyOtkLjDjQ&utm_content=207418717&utm_source=hs_email#disqus_thread

God Redeems
March 30, 2022
by Dr. Derwin L. Gray

“For Christ himself has brought peace to us. He united Jews and Gentiles into one people when, in his own body on the cross, he broke down the wall of hostility that separated us.” Ephesians 2:14 (NLT)

I’m grateful our God doesn’t waste anything the good, the bad or the ugly. Through the mystery of His loving providence, He uses our backgrounds and life experiences to re-create us into His ambassadors of reconciliation.  In our racially divided world, Jesus can redeem our pain and transform us into vessels that heal our racial divide.  Take the Apostle Paul, for instance. How could a pharisaical Jewish nationalist like Paul once was, racist toward pagan Gentiles, write these words from Ephesians 2:14, our key verse, about Christ uniting Jews and Gentiles?

“For Christ himself has brought peace to us. He united Jews and Gentiles into one people when, in his own body on the cross, he broke down the wall of hostility that separated us.” (Ephesians 2:14)

He doesn’t stop there Paul goes on to explain how Christ unites us to form His beautiful, multiethnic Church:  “He [Christ] did this by ending the system of law with its commandments and regulations. He made peace between Jews and Gentiles by creating in himself one new people from the two groups. Together as one body, Christ reconciled both groups to God by means of his death on the cross, and our hostility toward each other was put to death” (Ephesians 2:15-16, NLT).

Paul was only able to write these words because he met Jesus, who took him from being a racist and transformed him into a grace-ist! God redeemed Paul’s background, destroying the sin of racism and transforming him into a new creation. And God can do the same for you and me.  Around A.D. 1, in the multicultural world of the eastern Mediterranean, Paul, a future racial reconciler, was born. His father mentored him in the family trade of tentmaking. Because Paul grew up in a multicultural city, he interacted with and understood Greek (Gentile) culture. Paul’s multicultural upbringing became a strength in bridging the divide between Jews and Gentiles.In Jerusalem, Paul learned the Torah from the great Pharisee teacher Gamaliel. It was also there that an angry Jewish mob stoned Stephen, and Paul “agreed with putting him to death” (Acts 8:1a, CSB).

And while Paul was on his way to Damascus, “breathing threats and murder against” followers of Jesus (Acts 9:1, CSB), he met the risen Lord. (Acts 9:3-6)  It was then that God began to redeem Paul’s past. Paul’s eyes were opened, and he was filled with the Holy Spirit. He spent the remainder of his life passionately preaching a gospel that would forgive sins and also create a family with different skins. This is the unified, multiethnic family God promised Abraham. (Galatians 3:8; Galatians 3:28-29)  It took meeting the Lord Jesus to change Paul’s heart. Only Jesus could have turned Paul into someone who would love his neighbor in the most sacrificial ways. And Jesus has the power to soften our hearts today, bringing peace and breaking down walls of hostility.  As one body in Christ, may we be reconciled to God and with each other, and may any hostility be “put to death” (Ephesians 2:16, NLT).

18
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11934139/British-woman-28-dies-undergoing-gastric-band-surgery-Turkey.html

Horror as young British woman dies during gastric band surgery in Turkey: Devastated boyfriend leads tributes to 'angel', 28, who passed away while undergoing weight loss procedure used by celebrities

    Shannon Bowe, 28, from Denny, died on Saturday while undergoing the surgery

By Paul Smith and Natasha Anderson

Published: 17:34, 3 April 2023 | Updated: 19:41, 3 April 2023

A young British woman has died while undergoing gastric band surgery in Turkey, it has emerged today.  Shannon Bowe, 28, tragically passed away at the weekend during the weight loss procedure which involves placing a band around the stomach to decrease food consumption.  She is understood to have travelled to the Middle Eastern country to undergo the surgery. It is unclear at which medical facility she received the operation or what complications led to her death.  Ms Bowe's loved ones said they are 'devastated' by her death, with many sharing their memories of her in tributes on social media. In an emotional post, her heartbroken boyfriend Ross Stirling wrote: 'Sleep tight my angel, love you forever and always.'

A source said 'everyone is totally devastated' to learn of her passing and Facebook has been flooded with tributes to the 'beautiful angel' who was the 'life and soul of every party'.

'Shannon was one of the kindest people I knew and she would do anything for anyone. She was the life and soul of a party. It is so sad,' the insider said.

'These operations obviously are risky, but it is so rare you hear of this happening. Everyone is finding it really hard to believe she is no longer with us. She did not have any travel insurance and her family are now going to have to pay thousands of pounds to bring her back home.  This is the last thing they need to worry about.'

One friend wrote: 'Sad to see the news of Shannon Bowe thoughts with all friends and family.'

Someone else posted: 'No words, absolutely devastated. Life is so cruel. You will be forever in our hearts Shannon Bowe.'

Another friend echoed: 'Such a sad time to learn of the passing of such a beautiful young soul.   You always had the brightest spirit be it in the pub or when I saw you at work your smile was infectious & lit up even the darkest of days. Rest easy now Angel you have gained your wings.'

'I just don't know how to accept what's happened and words can't describe how I'm feeling, said another loved one. 'It's so cruel. My heart is sore for you and everyone that loved you. We have had some of the best memories and you really did make everyone laugh with your ways.  You were taken in such an unfair way and I'm so sorry Shannon Bowe.'

Another added: 'Rest in peace Shannon Bowe,' complete with two red love hearts.

'My heart is so sad Shannon. You were one of the purest most kindest souls I've ever met! So grateful for the memories with you.'

'Rest in peace beautiful girl. I'll miss you xo,' commented another.

A Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office spokesperson said: 'We are supporting the family of a British national who died in Turkey and are in contact with the local authorities.'

Gastric band surgery involves a doctor placing a gastric band around the top of the stomach, creating a small pouch, according to the NHS.  When the patient eats, the small pouch fills up more quickly than their stomach normally would, making them feel fuller with less food.  The procedure is said to help patients eat less, eat more slowly and lose weight.  According to the healthcare authority, gastric band surgery typically takes less than an hour, not including the time needed for inducing anaesthesia and waking a patient up. The total process should take about three to four hours.  Complication rates for weight loss surgery are low and approximately only 1 in 100 people suffer problems after gastric band surgery, the NHS reports.  Only 1 in 1,000 are likely not to survive the procedure.  Patients who are heavier, older, have had previous operations in the stomach area or have other significant health problems are at higher risk for complications.

19
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11923457/Oscar-Pistorius-learn-TODAY-freed-prison-early.html

Oscar Pistorius will stay behind bars until at least August 2024 after parole board admit he 'had NOT served the minimum detention period' for murdering Reeva Steenkamp

    Oscar Pistorius fatally shot Reeva Steenkamp at home on Valentine's Day 2013
    He was denied parole at a hearing in which his victim's parents opposed him

By Elena Salvoni

Published: 08:29, 31 March 2023 | Updated: 15:49, 31 March 2023

Oscar Pistorius has been denied an early release from prison and will now remain behind bars until at least August 2024 for the murder of his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, a decade ago.

He was denied parole having only served six years - less than the 'minimum detention period' required to qualify for early release - and will remain at Atteridgeville prison on the outskirts of Pretoria.

Ms Steenkamp's parents opposed the bid made by their daughter's killer, with her mother June telling the parole hearing today that she did not believe Pistorius had been rehabilitated.

Pistorius shot Ms Steenkamp dead in the early hours of Valentine's Day 2013, firing four times through the bathroom door of his Pretoria house, in a killing that shocked the world.

He was found guilty of murder and given a 13-year jail sentence in 2017 after a lengthy trial in which he maintained that he had mistaken Ms Steenkamp for an intruder.  Speaking exclusively to MailOnline, Reeva Steenkamp's parents tonight said they welcomed the decision, but still sought justice while Pistorius hankers after freedom.  Ms Steenkamp's 79-year-old mother, June, who attended the hearing, said: 'While we welcome today's decision, today is not a cause for celebration.  Barry and I miss Reeva terribly and will do so for the rest of our lives.  We believe in justice and hope that it continues to prevail.'

The Steenkamp family's lawyer, Tania Koen, revealed the news this afternoon, saying the decision has given Reeva's mother, June, 'a huge sense of relief'.  'I can confirm that parole has been denied, they will reconvene in a year to reconsider him again and we don't know the reasons yet (for the denial).'

The Department of Correctional Services said in a statement that the 'reason provided is that the inmate did not complete the minimum Detention Period'.

The result was a surprise but there has been legal wrangling over when Pistorius should be eligible for parole because of the series of appeals in his case.  He was initially convicted of culpable homicide, a charge comparable to manslaughter, in 2014.  The case then went through a number of appeals before Pistorius was finally sentenced to 13 years and five months in prison for murder in 2017.  Serious offenders must serve at least half their sentence to be eligible for parole in South Africa.  Pistorius' lawyers had gone to court to argue that he was now eligible because he had served the required portion of time in jail from late 2014 following his culpable homicide conviction.  The parole board's decision was reached based upon a clarification memo received from the Supreme Court just days ago, on March 28, spokesman Singabakho Nxumalo said.  Still desperate for freedom, Pistorius's lawyer, Julian Knight, told News24 that he would 'certainly be taking this decision on review'.

Before attending the hearing earlier today, June said that her daughter's killer was 'not remorseful or rehabilitated'.

She arrived shortly before 10.00am (9.00 GMT) to make oral and written statements on behalf of herself and her husband, Barry, expressing their view that Pistorius should not be released.

Speaking to reporters outside, June, who is from Blackburn, Lancashire, said 'I don't believe his story'.

Pistorius has always claimed he killed Steenkamp in the early hours of Valentine's Day 2013 after mistaking her for a dangerous intruder in his home.  The Steenkamps said they think he killed her intentionally after a late-night argument and want him to stay in prison.  Ms Steenkamp's father Barry was not present due to ill health, but had a statement read out on his behalf which was described as 'extremely emotional, extremely to the core'.

Carmen Dodd, who read Barry's victim-impact statement, said: 'Barry said he can't sleep at night, he can't find closure until the real truth is given to him.  He says, before he dies, he has one wish and that is Oscar would just tell us exactly what happened on that night.'

Ms Steenkamp's parents welcomed the news today, with their Ms Koen revealing that June is 'very relieved that it's over'.

The lawyer paid tribute to Reeva's mother June, 79, who she said the ordeal of the hearing had been 'very stressful' for.  She added that it had taken a 'huge amount of guts and courage' for her to attend.  'It was very unpleasant for her, the circumstances, but she knew she had to do it for Reeva and she did it I am very proud of her.'

June said before the hearing that she was 'very nervous' and that it was 'very hard to be in the same room' as her daughter's killer.  Ms Koen said it will be particularly tough for the heartbroken mother, as she has not confronted her daughter's killer since 2016.  'It's a very traumatic experience, as you can imagine.  It's painful June has to face Oscar Pistorius again this morning. He is the killer of their daughter, for them, it's a life sentence.   For them, it's 10 missed birthdays, 10 Mother's Days, 10 Father's Days, 10 Christmases.  They don't feel that he should be released, they feel he has shown no remorse and he's not rehabilitated, because if he had been he would have come clean and told the true story of what happened that night.  They believe he intended to kill Reeva unless he comes clean, they don't feel that he has rehabilitated.  They have no expectations,' Koen previously said of the Steenkamps ahead of the hearing. 'The law must take its course'.

Pistorius had pleaded not guilty and denied that he killed Ms Steenkamp in a rage, saying he mistook her for a burglar a version of events her family sees as untrue.  The gun enthusiast shot his girlfriend several times through the bathroom door with ammunition designed to inflict maximum damage to the human body.  Pistorius was jailed in 2016 six years initially before his sentence was extended to 13 years in 2017.  Offenders in South Africa are automatically eligible for parole consideration half way through their sentence.  Sources say Pistorius has been affected by his time in custody, and is now a shadow of his former self He could now leave Atteridgeville Correctional Centre in Pretoria as early as today if his parole is granted.  Comprising of at least three people, including prison services and community members, the board is to determine whether the purpose of imprisonment has been served, according to the Department of Correctional Services.  A spokesman at Atteridgeville today said the former athlete had been 'working quite hard' during his time at the prison.  He added that should the parole board think that any further 'interventions' need to be made with the prisoner, 'they will provide a timeframe for that'.

The independent parole board had to determine, among other issues, whether Pistorius posed a risk of committing similar crimes in the future, prison spokesperson Singabakho Nxumalo said previously.  It also considered his disciplinary record, training programmes in prison and his physical and mental state, prison officials said.  Of all the factors, legal experts considered the behavior of Pistorius while in prison as likely to have been the most important consideration.  His lawyer, Mr Knight, previously said Pistorius has been a 'model prisoner.'  Mr Knight said he would not comment until after a decision on the parole is made today.  Pistorius met Barry Steenkamp in June last year, in a process authorities said aims to ensure inmates 'acknowledge the harm they have caused to their victims and the society at large'.

But Ms Steenkamp's father came away from the meeting dissatisfied and 'emotional', his lawyer said.  'It was traumatic for both Mr Pistorius and Barry, it was painful, really painful,' said Ms Koen today.

When asked whether Barry got the sense that Oscar had any remorse, Ms Koen said: 'No, that's why we're here today'.

Barry did not travel to Pretoria from his home in Port Elizabeth today because of poor health.  His wife said the almost 80-year-old 'is not well' and that he 'can't walk anymore'.  The board considered whether Pistorius had been rehabilitated or still poses a danger to society, as well as his conduct in prison, according to the correctional services.  The hearing was closed to the media.  The case was particularly high profile as the famous South African athlete had just a year earlier been the first double amputee to compete in an able-bodied Olympics.  Seen as a power couple on South Africa's social scene, Ms Steenkamp was also well-known as a successful model and TV star.  After taking part in London 2012, Pistorius was courted by sponsors and admired worldwide for overcoming the difficulties associated with his disability.  But it all came crashing down after the killing in 2013, with the world bearing witness to his downfall as his trial was broadcast globally.  Following sentencing, he was sent to the Kgosi Mampuru II maximum security prison, one of South Africa's most notorious jails.  The killer, who uses prosthetics after his lower legs were amputated as a baby, was moved to the Atteridgeville prison in 2016, a facility which is better suited to disabled prisoners.   Now his bid for freedom has been denied, the disgraced athlete is now expected to remain at the facility for the foreseeable future.

Timeline of events in the Oscar Pistorius murder case

February 14, 2013: Police arrest the Olympic and Paralympic sprinter for killing Steenkamp, a 29-year-old model, who was shot four times at his Pretoria home.

February 15: Pistorius bursts into tears as he is charged, denying murder 'in the strongest terms'.

February 19: Pistorius claims in an affidavit he mistook Steenkamp for an intruder. He said he fired through a locked bathroom door, in what prosecutors term 'premeditated' murder.

February 21: Global sportswear manufacturer Nike suspends its sponsorship contract with the athlete.

February 22: Pistorius is granted bail.

The trial begins

March 3, 2014: The trial opens in Pretoria before crowds of journalists from around the world, with the testimony of a neighbour who tells the court she heard 'terrible screams' from a woman. Ten days later, Pistorius vomits when a picture of Steenkamp's body is flashed on the court's television screens.

April 7-15: Pistorius takes the stand and begins with a tearful apology to Steenkamp's family. This is followed by five days of often intense cross-examination, marked by bouts of tears and breaks in the session. Pistorius steadfastly denies any intention to kill Steenkamp.

June 30: After a six-week break, a panel of three psychiatrists and a psychologist conclude Pistorius does not suffer from mental illness.

September 12: Judge Thokozile Masipa finds Pistorius guilty of culpable homicide or manslaughter.

October 21: The judge sentences him to a maximum of five years in jail. He is taken to Pretoria prison.

Under house arrest

October 20, 2015: Pistorius is allowed out of prison after just one year to spend the remainder of his sentence under house arrest.

December 3: The Supreme Court of Appeal convicts him of murder, saying his testimony was 'vacillating and untruthful'.

December 8: Pistorius is released on bail pending sentencing, and remains under house arrest.

'Shockingly lenient' sentence

March 2, 2016: Pistorius, now 29, loses his final bid to appeal his murder conviction.

July 6: He is sentenced to six years in jail for murder.

August 14: South African media reports say Pistorius is put on 24-hour suicide watch.

September 15: Prosecutors say they will petition the Supreme Court of Appeal for a tougher sentence for Pistorius, having described the six-year term as 'shockingly lenient'.

November 14: Prison authorities say Pistorius has been transferred to a prison adapted for disabled inmates just outside Pretoria to serve the rest of his sentence.

Jail term extended

November 3, 2017: The appeal court adjourns to consider its ruling after prosecutors argue that Pistorius's jail term is too short, while defence lawyers say the judge handed down a fair sentence.

November 24: The Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein more than doubles Pistorius's sentence of six years to 13 years and five months.

Parole process

March 28, 2018: South Africa's highest court rejects Pistorius's leave to appeal, ending the long legal battle over the killing.

November 29, 2021: Prison services say Pistorius has been temporarily moved to a detention facility in the southern city of Gqeberha, formerly Port Elizabeth, as part of his parole process, having become eligible for early release a few months earlier, after serving half his sentence.

July 1, 2022: Prison services say Pistorius has met with Steenkamp's parents as part of his rehabilitation process.

March 31, 2023: A parole board is called to decide on whether the 36-year-old former athlete should be released early.

20
Faith / Going Through the Motions
« on: March 15, 2023, 04:57:03 PM »
https://proverbs31.org/read/devotions/full-post/2022/02/28/going-through-the-motions?_hsmi=204705327&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-8_vG38iQblZv5F63ZG2dYOHWeNEO8GjM1ygWnwPUTNvotStQZgIV0awSuDwq1GCLaIR6ZboF_7u2N64bsTSdSSsi7X1A#disqus_thread

Going Through the Motions
February 28, 2022

by Anitha Abraham

“As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.” John 15:9-11 (ESV)

Every year, my local church encourages us to fast in January. The purpose of this endeavor is for us as a church family to seek God for His plan for the new year, but the type of fast is up to the individual. Social media, meals, desserts and coffee have all been on my list, at some point. With much prayer, I planned out my fast no meats, sweets or fried foods for this girl! I was full of hope and excitement until it actually started.  My focus was so much on what I was depriving myself of that I failed to turn to the Lord for comfort. I soon realized I was consumed with WHAT I was giving up more than who I was giving it up FOR the Lord. I completely missed the point.  I didn’t think it was possible, but I was just going through the motions of a fast.  God began to show me I was going through the motions in other areas of my life, too. In my personal life: as a wife, daughter and friend. As an employee at work and a servant in ministry. I was doing what I was supposed to do but had lost the heart behind my actions.  The church at Ephesus shared a similar struggle. In Revelation 2:2-3, the church was commended for all they were doing right: “I [Christ] know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false. You have persevered and have endured hardships for my name, and have not grown weary” (NIV).

But the compliment quickly turned into a rebuke: “Yet I [Christ] hold this against you: You have forsaken the love you had at first” (Revelation 2:4, NIV).

It is easy to get into a rut when you have been doing the same thing for a while, even if that “thing” is good in and of itself.  Being on a fast can become more about the food than about the prayer. For me, it used to feel like a breakthrough was on its way when I fasted. But after fasting a few times, it just felt like a break from things I didn’t really want a break from.  Being a wife can become more about living in the same house than being a companion to my husband. Back when I was single, if you would have told me that one day I would come home from work and be more engaged with my phone than my husband, I would not have believed you. Unfortunately, in reality, I’ve had plenty of evenings when scrolling won out over spending quality time together.  Being a leader can become more about finishing the task than serving the people.  What I once embraced as a God-given assignment began to feel like a burden. I found myself operating in my own strength instead of His.  If it’s my 10th time or my 100th, in every part of my life, I want to do the right “what” with the right “why.” If you can relate to my struggle, you may be wondering, as I was How can we do more than just go through the motions?

Jesus, as always, has the answer: Abide.  “As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full.” (John 15:9-11)

What does it mean to “abide” in God? According to the original language of the New Testament, it simply means to remain, stay or wait. In a world that is constantly running on the wheel of busyness, this is challenging but worth it!  When Jesus talks about keeping the commandments, He invites us to do it from a place of love, not legalism. When we obey, the end result is joy! This isn’t just a fleeting happiness that comes and goes based on our emotions at the moment. It isn’t a joy based on doing all the right things or performing all the right actions. When our hearts are actively abiding, God gives us a fullness of joy that is eternal and complete.  The more we remain with Jesus, the more we become like Him. Our actions overflow from what God is doing in our hearts.  Less going through the motions. More love, more joy.  Less of me, more of Him.

21
Faith / Healing From Divorce That Stole the Life You Once Knew
« on: March 15, 2023, 04:39:13 PM »
https://proverbs31.org/read/devotions/full-post/2022/02/25/healing-from-divorce-that-stole-the-life-you-once-knew?_hsmi=204029193&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Y7SsjpuVejsDFS2PPTkMNCaLkBBXxrSqbmckyCvR9VHf8LJvF6dp9s8ObIIEDDsXj847A9rL_HoivJNyEKS9eSqwrRA#disqus_thread

Healing From Divorce That Stole the Life You Once Knew
February 25, 2022

by Tracie Miles

“… the LORD restored his fortunes. In fact, the LORD gave him twice as much as before!” Job 42:10 (NLT)

I was still trying to accept that my marriage was over when life got harder and scarier than I knew was possible.  In a short period of time, the financial situation for my three children and me went from secure and life-giving to insufficient, not sustaining even our basic needs. With no time to plan, I found myself a single mom and sole provider of our family. My house, car and everything we had was in jeopardy of being taken away. Fears of how to provide for my family became all-consuming, pulling me into a pit of fear, desperation, depression and despair.  Crying and pleading with God each day, I felt forgotten, unseen and unloved by the One who promises never to leave me. Until the night I had a dream that changed everything.  In the dream, I was curled up on my couch, hoping sleep might wash away my pain. Tears poured down my face with sobs of sorrow. I was completely broken, spent and at the end of my rope my waking emotions played out in my sleeping subconscious.  Then, through the blurring tears in my eyes, I noticed a figure entering the room. I immediately knew in my spirit it was Jesus. Rather than fear, a strange sense of peace, calm and safety washed over me. He spoke softly and gently, with a deep, tender and loving voice, and said, “Tracie, why didn’t you come to Me earlier? I will restore all that has been lost and broken.”

Hearing His voice startled me into consciousness. I abruptly awoke, staring into the blackness of the night, fully believing I had just experienced a divine, supernatural encounter.  I will restore all that has been lost and broken echoed over and over in my mind comforting words I had longed to hear, which planted a whisper of hope in my soul. Words that reaffirmed He did see me and I wasn’t forgotten or unloved. Words that reassured me He not only had the power to restore all that had been taken from my life, but He indeed had plans for it. As a tear dripped onto my pillow, the story of Job came to mind.  In the course of one day and due to no fault of his own, Job lost all 10 of his children, all his possessions, his wealth and his health. He didn’t understand why he was suffering, and throughout the book of Job, we see him expressing heartache and anger at all the pain God was allowing in his life. We also see evidence of his impatience regarding how long it was taking God to bring about restoration.  Yet through it all and despite his human emotions, Job never doubted that full surrender and trust were necessary. In Job 1:21b-c, he even says, “The LORD gave me what I had, and the LORD has taken it away. Praise the name of the LORD!” (NLT).

Despite Job’s suffering, he trusted God’s plans and continued to praise Him. As a result, not only did Job’s faith soar but his life eventually did as well.

In Chapter 42 of the book of Job, we read how God blessed Job and his faithfulness in every way. Today’s key verse, Job 42:10, says, “... the LORD restored his fortunes. In fact, the LORD gave him twice as much as before!”

God gave him a double portion of all he had lost, restored his marriage and family, and allowed him to live happily to a ripe, old age. It didn’t happen overnight, but it did happen.  Job’s restoration gave me hope, but as I thought back to my dream, I couldn’t help wondering about the first question I had heard: “Why didn’t you come to Me sooner?”

I honestly believed I had gone to Jesus. A million times, in fact.  But what I had not gone to Him with was total surrender and trust. You see, instead of surrendering my problems to Him, I had been telling Him about them constantly, worrying incessantly, then trying to solve them on my own. Rather than trusting for miraculous provision, I doubted whether He would really come through. I doubted if restoration of all that had been lost from my peace to my physical well-being was even in the cards.  Yet, over time, I learned total surrender and unwavering faithfulness in God’s sovereignty will always open the door for His restoration to begin.  Divorce can steal a lot from us, but it doesn’t have to steal our peace and joy. Whether it’s hearts, finances, relationships or lives that need mending, God always has a plan to heal and restore. I fully believe the restoration of my heart, and my life, is on God’s holy to-do list as is yours.

22
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11797719/Sister-honour-killing-victim-Banaz-Mahmod-tells-joy-new-marriage-laws.html

Tragedy of sisters who inspired change in Britain's marriage laws: How teenager was forced to wed 'big, balding man almost twice her age' before her sibling was murdered in honour killing after fleeing older husband

•   Payzee Mahmod was forced to 'balding man' twice her age when she was just 16
•   Her sister, Banaz, was savagely killed in 2006 after she left her forced marriage
•   A new law now means that such forced childhood weddings could never happen

By Tom Cotterill For Mailonline

Published: 11:02, 27 February 2023 | Updated: 12:46, 27 February 2023

A woman forced to marry a man as a child and whose sister was murdered in an 'honour killing' has described new laws increasing the legal age of marriage to 18 as 'one of the most important days' of her life.  Campaigner Payzee Mahmod was just 16 when she was 'coerced' into marrying a 'big, balding man almost twice her age' by her father Mahmod Babakir Mahmod, an asylum seeker from Kurdistan.   Her sister, Banaz Mahmod, was just 17 when she was ordered to marry a man - but she was later raped and killed under orders from her 'Evil Punisher' of a father after she fled her abusive partner and fell in love with a man her family hated.  Both of their marriages, although forced, were legal. But no longer; from today, a new law has upped the minimum age of marriage from 16 to 18 in England and Wales in a move the Government said would safeguard children from forced marriages.   And, in a toughening up of legislative powers, it is now illegal to arrange for children to marry under any circumstances, whether or not force is used news which an emotional Ms Mahmod said was a 'celebratory moment' in her quest for change.  Hailing the new laws as 'probably one of the most important days of my life', Ms Mahmod told BBC News: 'It's very emotional for me because I know truly, in great detail, the harms of child marriage.  I've personally been through it, I've seen my sister go through it. And I've seen the devastating impacts that it can have for so many women and girls.  When they try to leave child marriages, the ultimate penalty is death and this is exactly what happened in my sister's case.'

Banaz, an Iraqi Kurd from Mitcham, south London, murdered in January 2006 after she fell in love with a man her family disapproved of in a so-called honour killing that shocked Britain.  She was raped, tortured and strangled to death with the bootlace after she walked out of a marriage she had been forced to enter just three years earlier at 17.  Her body was put in a suitcase and taken to the Midlands before being buried in a make-shift grave in a back-garden in Handsworth, Birmingham. The savage killing was dramatised by ITV in 2020 in the show, Honour, which left viewers tearful.  In 2007, following a three-month trial at the Old Bailey, her father, Mahmod Mahmod, was found guilty of murder and sentenced 20 years in prison.  Meanwhile her uncle, Ari Mahmod, was also found guilty over the killing and sentenced to 23 years.  Mohamad Hama also admitted murder and was sentenced to at least 17 years in prison.  Three years later, Banaz's cousins Omar Hussain and Mohamad Saleh Ali, who carried out the killing, were extradited from Iraq and given life sentences.  The young woman's nightmare began three years earlier, when she was forced to enter a marriage to a Kurdish man, then aged 28, who she later told police was 'very strict'.   She had met her husband-to-be only three times before her wedding day and, according to Banaz, her husband regularly physically and sexually abused her.  From December 2005 to January 2006 Banaz told police four times that her family had wanted her dead and described the litany of sexual violence she had been forced to endure at the hands of her abusive husband.   In a recorded interview with police prior to her death Banaz told an officer that she was being followed by members of the Iraqi-Kurdish community.  She said: 'People following me. Still now they follow me.  That's the main reason that I came to the police station. In the future at any time if anything happens to me, it's them.'   

The terrified young woman left her husband after two-and-a-half years, a decision that angered her family, who had arrived in Britain when Banaz was 12.  After returning to her family home, she met and fell in love with Rahmat Sulemani, a family friend.  He would later give evidence at the trial, revealing that he and Banaz had been threatened with death if they carried on seeing each other.  While the lovers continued to meet in secret they were spotted together outside Morden tube station, south London, in December 2005.  Banaz's father was informed and arranged the horrific killing of his own daughter.  During an Old Bailey trial it later emerged that on New Year's Eve, 2005, a bleeding and terrified Banaz had told PC Angela Cornes that her father had just tried to kill her.   However the police officer dismissed her as 'dramatic and calculating' and  instead considered charging her with criminal damage for breaking a window during her escape.   Banaz was killed three weeks later.  Sentencing the men to life at the Old Bailey in 2007, Judge Brian Barker said: 'This offence was designed to carry a wider message to the community to discourage legal behaviour of girls and women in this country.  Having endured a short and unhappy marriage she made the mistake of falling in love with a Kurdish man that you and your community thought was unsuitable.  So, to restore your so-called family honour you decided she should die and her memory be erased. This was a barbaric and a callous crime.'

Banaz's younger sister Payzee has been a fighting for a change in marriage laws, raising the age to 18 and making forced marriages a practice she branded 'harmful stripping millions of girls of their rights and their choices' - illegal.  In a video released by West Midlands Police in 2020, Ms Mahmod said: 'My name is Payzee Mahmoud and I'm a forced marriage survivor.  When I was just 16 years old, my father coerced me into marrying a man I had ever met before. My sister, Banaz, who was 17, also had a forced marriage.  I was fortunate enough to leave my marriage but my sister, as a result of leaving her forced, abusive marriage, was the victim of a so-called 'honour' killing.  Forced marriage doesn't just happen in London or the West Midlands. This is a harmful practice that is happening globally and it is stripping millions of girls of their rights and their choices.'

Speaking on Monday on the first day of the new laws' introduction, Ms Mahmod said she had experience sexual and physical violence during her forced marriage.   'We're talking about childhood which is a really important time to pursue your dreams. For me that was all taken away. I went from being a 16-year-old to being somebody's wife, which is no position for a child to be in,' she told BBC Breakfast.

'That really exposed me to so much harm; I'm talking about domestic violence, emotional and sexual violence - so it's really not something that any child should go through and that is why this has been so, so important for me to fight for.'

Under legislation passed last year but coming into force today, 16 and 17-year-olds can no longer wed or enter a civil partnership in England or Wales.  Until now they were able to do this as long as there was parental consent.  The change, under the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Act, is to better protect children from forced marriage.  It means it is now a crime to exploit vulnerable children by arranging for them to marry under any circumstances, whether or not force was used.  The law will also cover non-legally binding 'traditional' ceremonies which would still be viewed as marriages by the parties and their families.   The legislation has been described as a 'huge leap forward' in fighting the 'hidden abuse' of forced marriage.  Natasha Rattu, director of the Karma Nirvana charity, said: 'We hope that the new law will help to increase reporting [of forced marriages], affording greater protection to children at risk.  Last year, the national Honour Based Abuse helpline supported 64 cases of child marriage, representing only a small picture of a much bigger problem.  We hope that the new law will help to increase identification and reporting, affording greater protection to children at risk.'

The Government's forced marriage unit provided advice or support in 118 cases involving victims aged under 18 in 2021.  The Ministry of Justice said the statistics showed forced marriage is more likely to impact girls than boys, with 2018 figures for England and Wales showing that 28 boys married under the age of 18 compared with 119 girls.
 
'My sister and I called our father the Evil Punisher. Finally I had a chance to send him to prison for her murder': BEKHAL MAHMOD says justice for tragic Banaz gave her strength to testify in 'honour killing' trial despite fears family would kill her next

by BEKHAL MAHMOD FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY

For the first few days of my sister’s murder trial, I was not allowed into Courtroom 10 of the Old Bailey. I would have to wait until I had given evidence before I could watch proceedings. But I’m glad I didn’t have to witness the distressing moment that footage was played to the jury of my beautiful sister, 20-year-old Banaz, pleading to an ambulance crew that ‘my dad is trying to kill me’.

On trial for her killing, he had sniggered throughout the tragic six-minute clip.It had been filmed at St George’s Hospital, in Tooting, South-West London, just weeks before her short life ended. At the start of proceedings, in March 2007, our father Mahmod Babakir Mahmod the Evil Punisher, as I called him while growing up and our uncle Ari Mahmod had both pleaded not guilty to Banaz’s killing. The court heard that my sister had been strangled in a so-called honour killing in the lounge of our home in Mitcham, South London, on January 24, 2006.  The killing itself had been carried out by Mohamed Hama, who was described in court as a ‘close family friend’, even though he was actually a cousin to me and Banaz. Both our parents had gone out so that Hama and his accomplices could commit the crime.  Banaz’s body was then stuffed in a suitcase and buried in a garden in Birmingham. A discarded fridge freezer was put over her crude grave. She had been there for at least three months before police found her, a bootlace ligature still around her neck.  Victor Temple QC, prosecuting, described Banaz’s murder as a ‘cold-blooded and callous execution’ that had been ordered by Dad and Ari.  Temple explained the tight-knit dynamics of the Kurdish community in South London where, if a family name is shamed, ‘retribution often merciless must follow, especially if the family member is a woman’. He said: ‘Women are not treated as equals. Banaz was killed for no other reason than she chose, after an unhappy marriage, to associate and fall in love with another man.  Her father was indifferent to his daughter’s fate and showed no remorse from first to last, perceiving the loss of reputation was more important than his daughter’s life.’

Before I testified against the Evil Punisher and Ari, in a private witness room at the Old Bailey, I worked myself up into a panic, pacing nervous circles as I said to myself: ‘Oh my God, they’re going to kill me, they’re going to kill me, they’re going to kill me…’

Giving evidence for the prosecution would mean testifying against my family and, by extension, the entire Kurdish community.  My head was a tumble dryer. What if Dad and Ari get off?

What if one of them leaps from the dock while I’m giving my evidence?

What if there’s a Kurdish man in the public gallery, armed with a knife, ready to storm the witness stand and slit my throat?

Will the jury believe me?

The risks involved were insurmountable. By now, I had a baby daughter and the police had moved us to a secret location amid death threats. The thought of facing Dad and Ari in court terrified me to the core. But securing justice for Banaz outweighed all the risks.  A screen would be erected around the witness box to shield me from the public gallery and dock, but I would still need to walk into the courtroom to get to it. There was no way I could let Dad or Ari see my face, so I decided to wear a hijab, niqab and abaya.  A hijab is a head covering, a niqab is the traditional Muslim face veil, while the abaya is a square of fabric that drapes from your shoulders to your feet.    As I advanced with two security guards into the courtroom, the first people I noticed were the defendants, both in grey suits and, as always, watching my every step.   Ari gave me one of his smug smiles. I’ll never forget that look. It said: ‘I’m going to win this case then kill you.’

Dad crossed his brows, his hatred for me palpable in his menacing stare.  I quickly averted my gaze to the blue screen around the witness stand ahead, aware that every pair of eyes in that packed courtroom was on me. I wanted to do this for Banaz. I swallowed hard, looked at the jury, and said: ‘I promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.’

What I learned during the trial about the final two-and-a-half hours of Banaz’s precious life haunts me still. She had been tortured and raped. On the blood-red carpet of the home in which my sister should have felt secure and loved by her family, she had been kicked and stamped on by Hama, before he strangled her to death.  Since his arrest, Hama had been recorded in telephone calls made from prison, boasting and laughing to a friend about her murder. Referring to the bootlace he strangled Banaz with, he said: ‘The wire was thick, and the soul would not just leave. All in all, it took five minutes to strangle her. I was kicking and stamping on her neck to get the soul out.’

We sat beneath the balcony of the public gallery, shielded by security guards. Through the rectangle of my veil, I stared at Dad and Ari, who both eyeballed me back.  When the jury filed in to deliver their verdict, a rush of heat shot from my heart to my scalp. I felt faint, like I was about to pass out, and my hands trembled in my lap. Dad and Ari showed no emotion as they stood. They looked like two bored men waiting at a bus stop.  Next, the foreman of the jury rose and my heart thrummed in my ears as the judge spoke. ‘On the charge of murder, do you find the defendant Mahmod Babakir Mahmod guilty or not guilty?’

I squeezed my eyes shut.  Oh God, please don’t let them walk free.  ‘Guilty.’

‘Yes!’ I shouted through my niqab.

‘On the charge of murder, do you find the defendant Ari Mahmod guilty or not guilty?’

‘Guilty.’

In all, seven male relatives were convicted of Banaz’s murder or related crimes. Our father and uncle were unanimously convicted of her murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 20 and 23 years respectively. One cousin pleaded guilty to murder at this trial, and another was convicted of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.  Three other men, all cousins, would also be convicted of murder, or other violent crimes, in two further trials in 2010 and 2013. In a first of its kind, two of Banaz’s killers were extradited from Iraq, where they had fled.  When the judge sentenced Dad and Ari, he asked where is the honour in a father putting his status in the community before the life of his own flesh and blood?

That day, a mixture of emotions hit me. First came relief, quickly overshadowed by fear and pain. Then came a deep, gut-wrenching sadness as Dad cast me one final look of contempt.  I looked away. I could not begin to conceive the reality of what he’d done to Banaz. All the justice in the world could not bring her back.  Even with those evil men in prison, I will never feel safe. I’ll always be looking over my shoulder. Before the trial began, I had entered the witness protection programme. I did not want to, but if I had refused, there was a good chance my daughter would have been taken into care for her safety.  My life is difficult. It’s a lonely life. I never wanted to cut ties with my family, but circumstances meant I had to. What I wouldn’t give to see my younger sisters. Nowadays, I suffer panic attacks and nightmares and, to be honest, I will never be fully happy again.  Being in witness protection means I’m unable to talk to many people about my childhood or family or the acts of evil committed by my father, uncle and cousins. I can’t tell new friends about my beautiful, caring little sister. Nor can I cry to them on Banaz’s birthday or the anniversary of her death.  In May 2016, I heard the shocking news that Banaz’s partner at the time of her murder Rahmat, who had supported me through the trial and given evidence that helped convict her murderers had taken his life. According to reports, he had tried to do this twice before.  He had been given a new identity after her murder, under the witness protection programme. Even Rahmat’s parents, who lived in Iran, had received death threats.  ‘Banaz and I fell in love,’ he said as we sat chatting in the witness room. ‘We didn’t commit a crime. How could they do this to her?’

He had broken down in the witness box when he watched the video of my sister pleading with the ambulance crew, which he had filmed at the hospital on his mobile phone. Describing his love for my sister, he told the jury: ‘I don’t think I have ever loved anyone as much as I loved Banaz. She was my first love. She meant the world to me.’

I looked at Rahmat. ‘It’s not your fault. You made Banaz happy. She would hate for you to feel guilty. You did not kill her.’

He leaned forwards, covering his face with his hands. ‘My life means nothing without Banaz.’

Poor Rahmat. l truly believe that he could not live without her.  Banaz was clearly madly in love with Rahmat, too. In text messages, she’d called him ‘My prince, my shining one’.

The court heard how Banaz had finally found the courage to walk out on the husband she claimed beat and raped her. In Rahmat, however, she had found a kind, loving and ‘open-minded’ partner whom she’d hoped to marry.  It broke my heart when I heard how Banaz and Rahmat were forced to keep their relationship a secret all because he was not an Iraqi-Kurd or a strict Muslim from the precious ‘Mirawaldy tribe’. The hypocrisy of this never fails to astound me.  Rahmat told me of his and Banaz’s wish to have children. They had even picked baby names together. ‘Banaz really wanted a daughter,’ said Rahmat through a tearful smile, ‘so we agreed on Rose for a little girl.’ I replied with more tears, remembering how Banaz loved her flowers.

A few weeks after the sentencing, Rahmat and I visited Banaz’s grave for the first time. Police drove us to Morden Cemetery in separate unmarked cars. They locked the gates while several plainclothes officers guarded the graveyard.  I met Rahmat and we walked together to Banaz’s grave. My arms were full of flowers: two bunches of lilies, which were Banaz’s favourite, one yellow, the other pink, and a bouquet of orange roses.  The mouth of a green vase poked out of my shoulder bag, which Rahmat offered to carry. As we walked, with officers trailing our steps, Rahmat again spoke of his grief for Banaz, whom my family had nicknamed Nazca, which means ‘beautiful’ and ‘delicate’ in Kurdish.  We stopped for a moment in the spitting rain, a few feet shy of the mound of earth that marked Nazca’s resting place, and I glanced up at Rahmat. He looked as though he hadn’t slept for weeks. His eyes, circled with purply shadows, were swollen from crying.  ‘Oh, Rahmat, I know how much you miss Banaz,’ I said. ‘I miss her too, and I know I can’t magic her back, but I am here for you, if ever you need to talk.’

‘Please,’ he said, proffering my shoulder bag, ‘you should spend some time with your sister. I’ll leave you in peace to say goodbye.’

I thanked Rahmat, thinking: ‘How typical of Banaz to choose such a polite, caring man.’

I stepped forwards, then knelt in the soggy grass. There was no headstone, only a small plaque emblazoned with a plot number, so I placed my vase where the headstone should have been and began to arrange the flowers.  As I did this, I remembered Banaz admiring the daffodils outside our house in Morden Road.  ‘I love flowers, Bakha,’ she had said. ‘Yellow and orange are my favourite colours.’

And I sobbed as I thought of her delicate fingers touching those petals. I filled the vase with the yellow lilies and orange roses, then sat back on my heels and whispered my final farewell.  ‘Oh, Nazca, if you were here, the whole world would be orange and yellow. I love you, my darling sister. Sleep tight, my angel.’
© Bekhal Mahmod and Dr Hannana Siddiqui, 2022

New marriage laws at a glance: this is what has changed

From today, the legal age of marriage has risen to 18 in England and Wales.  Previously those aged 16 and 17 could wed if they had parental consent.  There was also no law against ceremonies for younger children which were not registered with a local council.  Ministers say the new rules will help better protect vulnerable children from being forced into marriage,   Previously, forced marriage was only an offence if coercion, such as threats, had been used.  Under the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Minimum Age) Act, it is now illegal to arrange for children to marry under any circumstances.  Those found guilty of doing so could be jailed for up to seven years.  The changes do not apply in Scotland and Northern Ireland, where the minimum age of 16 will remain.  In Northern Ireland, parental consent is still needed to marry under the age of 18 which isn't the case in Scotland. 

23
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11726165/Police-Scotland-defy-Sturgeons-gender-self-ID-drive-calling-transgender-butcher-suspect-man.html

Police Scotland defy Nicola Sturgeon's gender self-ID drive by calling transgender butcher arrested over disappearance of 11-year-old girl a man as embattled First Minister is engulfed by trans row

    Andrew George Miller, 53, was charged over schoolgirl, 11, who had disappeared
    Police Scotland say Miller is a man, despite the fact suspect identifies as woman

By Dan Sales For Mailonline

Published: 09:20, 8 February 2023 | Updated: 09:35, 8 February 2023

Police say a transgender butcher charged in Scotland over an 11-year-old schoolgirl's disappearance is a man - in a move at odds with Nicola Sturgeon's gender ID drive.  Police Scotland said this morning Andrew George Miller, 53, had now been charged after the teenager was found safe at a house near Galashiels on Monday night.  The suspect now identifies as a woman called Amy George, but has two Facebook profiles and posts under both male and female identities.  Miller's now closed butcher Millers of Melrose had been featured in one of JK Rowling's Strike novels and at one point the passage was displayed in the shop window.  The police declaration that Miller is a man seems at odds with the Scottish First Minister's gender self-ID crusade.  Ms Sturgeon has come under sustained pressure over her Gender Recognition Act over fears it could make it easier for predatory men to pose as women.  She has faced a maelstrom of criticism in the wake of the Isla Bryson scandal which saw a rapist who attacked two women self-identify as a female in an apparent bid for easier jail time.  As is customary in Scottish law, it is not specified what offence or offences Miller has been charged with by police.  Under the male identity Miller appeared to be very interested in Sturgeon's new law, posting online in January this year: 'Silly billies in Westminster Never mess with Scottish Transgender Issues'.

A team of forensic officers have been seen at Miller's home in the village of Gattonside.  It is three miles away from where the primary pupil was last spotted before she went missing.  A neighbour said: 'A man was seen being put into the back of the police vehicle.  It's a really affluent area and is extremely quiet so this has all come as a bit of a shock. The person who lives there used to run the butcher shop in Melrose.  They use a woman's name now but were previously known as Andrew and are very well known in the community.'

The 53-year-old arrested over the disappearance was identified as a man in the police's publicity yesterday.  A force statement said: 'A 53-year-old man has been arrested in connection with the disappearance of an 11-year-old girl from Galashiels, who was reported missing on Sunday, February 5.  The girl was traced at a property in the Galashiels area at about 9.30pm on Monday, February 6. Inquiries into the circumstances are ongoing.'

Police who had been looking for her were joined by volunteers, Tweed Valley Mountain Rescue Team and the Borders Search and Rescue Unit, while a helicopter scoured the area.  Specialist water search teams trawled the River Tweed in the hunt for clues, while members of the public were urged to check their outbuildings and sheds for any sign of the missing youngster. Speaking at a press conference outside Galashiels police station on Monday, area commander Chief Superintendent Catriona Paton issued a plea for information.  Police publicly announced that the girl had been discovered 'safe and well' at about 10.30pm on Monday while thanking everyone for their search efforts.

24
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11630995/The-Elvis-Presley-curse-continues-Lisa-Marie-dead-54.html

The 'curse' of the Elvis dynasty continues: How death of King's only child Lisa Marie is latest chapter in the Presleys' tragic tale from legend's stillborn twin, his beloved mother who drank herself into early grave and grandson who killed himself at 27

    Lisa Marie Presley has died at the age of 54 after a 'cardiac arrest' at her home 
    She was found by her family in tragedy mirroring finding her own father dead
    Elvis' identical twin, Jesse Garon, was stillborn minutes before Elvis arrived
    Fans believe the Presleys were cursed with bad luck after the tragedy in 1935

By Martin Robinson, Chief Reporter For Mailonline

Published: 10:21, 13 January 2023 | Updated: 16:14, 13 January 2023

Lisa Marie Presley's tragic early death at the age of 54 has further deepened despair among her father's fans who insist the family has been cursed since the stillbirth of his identical twin brother Jesse.  Lisa Marie, The King's only child and sole heir to his Graceland estate, went into cardiac arrest at her LA home yesterday afternoon and died in hospital with her mother Priscilla by her side.  Lisa Marie suffered a tragic and chaotic life that began for her when she found her father dead on the floor of the bathroom when she was just nine and he was 42 in August 1977.  And, heartbreakingly, today it emerged she herself was found unresponsive at home when her ex-husband brought her two children back from school, just days after she appeared vulnerable and unsteady at the Golden Globe Awards as she struggled to cope with the suicide of her son in July 2020.  Many Elvis fans believe that the Presley family is cursed in the same way the Kennedy dynasty has been and Lisa Marie's sudden and early passing will further fuel that theory. Some pointed out on social media that her passing came hours before Friday the 13th in California but on the day itself in the rest of the world.  Elvis, his brother, his parents and now his daughter died young. At the star's funeral two young fans were killed trying to see his coffin when a car plowed into crowds outside Graceland. And a fortnight later grave thieves tried to steal his body, which was holding a bangle left there by his beloved Lisa Marie.  As Elvis Presley's only child died, it emerged today:

    Lisa Marie Presley told fans at Graceland she had become a recluse in a poignant speech just days before her sudden death aged 54;
    Her heartbroken mother Priscilla confirms the news saying 'my beautiful daughter Lisa Marie has left us' after she rushed to her hospital bedside in LA;
    Elvis's late daughter confessed to being 'destroyed' by her son's suicide, saying she 'blames herself every single day';
    Days before her death she was unsteady while being interviewed on the red carpet at the 2023 Golden Globes, where she attended to support the film Elvis

Elvis Presley, arguably the greatest star of the past century, was born to a poor Mississippi family 82 years ago but his life was marked with tragedy from the start.  35 minutes before he entered the world his identical twin brother Jesse was born without a heartbeat a moment that would mark his mother Gladys.  It would spark a stifling obsession with her only surviving son and lead to the alcoholism that would claim her life at 46.  Gladys encouraged Elvis to believe that he was destined for great things. When one twin dies, she said, the survivor grows up with all the additional qualities of the other. One family insider said recently: 'The curse began when Elvis was born on January 8, 1935, in Tupelo, Mississippi, and his identical twin brother, Jesse Garon was stillborn.'

Others have claimed that an error by an undertaker who misspelled his name as Jessie on the tombstone could be the cause of the curse.  Money had never come easily to Gladys and Elvis's father Vernon Presley. They met in 1933 at a Pentecostal church in Tupelo, Mississippi.  Gladys was 22 and Vernon 17 and while she worked as a sewing-machine operator in a local clothing factory, he did whatever work he could find in the Great Depression.  The home they moved into after their marriage that same year was a two-room shack with no electricity or running water. When Gladys became pregnant with twins they ran in hers and Vernon's families they couldn't afford medical check-ups and only when there were complications with the birth on January 8, 1935, did they call a doctor, his fee paid by a charity.  He couldn't save Elvis's twin Jesse, who was stillborn. He was buried in an unmarked grave in a local cemetery a day or so later, by which time Gladys, who had lost a lot of blood, had been taken, with her surviving baby, to a hospital. Having lost one son, Gladys was always terrified that she would lose Elvis, too.  When she came out of hospital, she didn't go back to the clothing factory. Instead, she waited a few months and then went cotton picking which was hard, dry, scratchy work but meant she could lay Elvis down on a sack and drag him along the rows beside her.  When he was a little older, it's said that he would help her with the cotton, picking the bolls off the stems. And the bond between mother and son strengthened still further when Elvis was three and his father received a short prison sentence for cheque fraud.  Left to fend for herself and Elvis, Gladys was unable to pay the rent while Vernon was incarcerated and so they were evicted, thereafter moving from house to house.  'Don't worry, Mama,' he told Gladys when he overheard his parents worrying about money one day. 'When I grow up, I'm going to buy you a fine house and pay everything you owe at the grocery store, and buy two Cadillacs, one for you and Daddy and one for me.'

Wherever they lived, the three of them always slept in the same room.  But whenever Vernon was away, seeking work in other towns, Gladys and little Elvis spent the night in the same bed, talking in their own private baby language.  For Gladys, further proof that Elvis was a child apart came when he fell so ill with tonsillitis that they thought they might lose him.  Once again unable to afford a doctor, they knelt by his bed and prayed and when the fever eventually passed Gladys was convinced that it was a message from God, proof that her boy really was special.  And so it proved and he became the brightest star on the world stage.  When she saw him going off to engagements out of town, she was uneasy. The world outside frightened her, and as his success grew, her fears increased.  He had noticed that she had begun taking some pills amphetamines she was getting from the doctor and that they were making her fretful and overactive in the house always running around and cleaning.  He pretended not to notice her drinking, because he never touched alcohol himself and didn't like drunks he had been told that Vernon's father, Jesse, had been an alcoholic. But he had noted how the pills also gave her energy something he needed for what he was doing on stage every night and soon began taking some himself.  Elvis moved to Graceland and bought his mother a house - but she would say that she 'wished we were poor again' after posher neighbours suggested she was bringing down the area, especially because she loved speaking to her son's fans, offering them lemonade and a dip in her pool in hot weather.  Much like Elvis, Gladys suffered a sudden period of intense health decline and substance abuse, leading to her death at 46 of heart failure.  Some said she died of a broken heart.  Elvis, who was in the US Army at the time, was hit hard by her death and was in a state of "near hysteria" at her funeral where he began yelling: 'Oh God, everything I have is gone. I lived my life for you. I loved you so much.'

Gladys's death has long been attributed to hepatitis, caused by liver problems due to drinking. Gladys had three brothers, each of whom also died in their forties from heart failure or lung complications.  In the recently published biography, Elvis: Destined to Die Young, author Sally Hoedel argued the deaths of Elvis, his mother, and his uncles were likely caused by a genetic defect brought on by the incestuous marriage of Elvis's maternal grandparents, who were first cousins.  Vernon died when he was 63 after a heart attack in June 1979 two years after his son passed away. He was living on the Graceland estate with his second wife, Dee.  Elvis met his future wife Priscilla when she was 14 and they married when she was 22 it was an unhappy union but would bring him his beloved daughter.  As a child at Graceland, she had ponies, private access to an amusement park for herself and her friends, and staff at her beck and call.  When Elvis found out that Lisa Marie wanted to see snow for the first time, he ordered his private jet to fly her to Idaho to play in the snow for twenty minutes, before flying her home again.  By 1977, the year he died, Elvis was addicted to prescription drugs and bingeing on junk food, weighing approaching 30 stone.  On August 16, 1977, Lisa Marie, then just nine, may have been the last person to see her dad alive.  She said in later life: 'I don’t like talking about this. It was 4am I was supposed to be asleep, actually. He found me.'

Later that morning she walked into a bathroom to find Elvis face down and Ginger Alden trying to wake him up. But he was already dead.  'My daddy’s dead! He’s smothered in the carpet!' she apparently said. She added later: 'His body was in the house for three days and there was something very oddly comforting about that, which made it not necessarily real to me.'

Even his hasty funeral two days later was marked by tragedy when a car hit a group of mourning fans trying to see the coffin outside the gates of Graceland, killing two young women. 

Then a fortnight later someone tried to steal his body from his mausoleum - some claimed it was a ransom plot, others believed it was to find out more about his death.

Her mother Priscilla, who divorced Elvis in 1973, turned out to be a business genius, and turned around the estate.

She made Graceland a global tourist destination, and capitalized on merchandising, image deals, and royalties from songs recorded after the RCA deal - leaving the trust with $100million by 1993.

Lisa Marie lived most of her life in Los Angeles, but in 2010 she and then-husband Lockwood bought a 15th century manor house set in 50 acres of rural England, in East Sussex.  Coes Hall boasted an orangery, pond and indoor swimming pool plus spectacular grounds including walled gardens, tennis courts and parkland.  She sold the house in 2021 for £3.5million ($4.3million), after five years on the market.  In March 2020 Lisa Marie bought a 3,500-square-foot five bedroom Calabasas home for $1.8million.  But scarcely four months later, her son Benjamin Keough, 27, took his own life on the premises. She sold the home for $2million in March 2021 in an off-market deal.  In August last year Lisa Marie wrote an essay about Benjamin's death to mark National Grief Awareness.  'I can understand why people may want to avoid you once a terrible tragedy has struck. Especially a parent losing their child because it is truly your worst nightmare,' she wrote in the essay, which was published by People.

Benjamin's father was Danny Keough, whom Lisa Marie she married in 1988 and divorced in 1994.  In the emotional essay, Lisa Marie admitted that she had kept her distance from the parents of other people whose children died by suicide, something that seemed to haunt her.  'I can recall a couple of times in my life where I knew parents who lost their child and while I could be there for them when it happened, I avoided them after and never bothered to follow up with them because they quite literally became a representative of my biggest fear,' she wrote.

'I also low-key judged them, and I swore I'd never do whatever it was that I felt they either did or neglected in their parental actions and choices with their child.'

At the time of her death, Lisa Marie was living at another Calabasas home with her first husband Danny Keough, to whom she remained close.  Lisa Marie's death has left unresolved legal battles over her finances, and questions as to how lost the $100million fortune left to her by her father.  Lisa Marie, whose death on Thursday was confirmed by her mother Priscilla, was still battling her fourth and final husband Michael Lockwood when she died.  Lockwood, father of her twin daughters Harper Vivienne and Finley, was seeking $4,000 a month in child support and insisted Lisa Marie had more money than she claimed in court documents.  Lisa Marie, in turn, said she was at one point $16million in debt, following disastrous business deals made by her business manager Barry Siegel.  She sued him in 2018, accusing him of mismanaging her inheritance.  Lisa Marie was married to Keough, Michael Jackson, and Nicholas Cage before Lockwood, but is not believed to have gained financially from her marriages.  She appointed Barry Siegel in 2003 to manage the money the same year she launched a musical career of her own.  Siegel, senior managing director of Provident Financial Management and a prominent entertainment business manager, counted Al Pacino, Elijah Wood, Pulitzer Prize-winning playwright David Mamet, and Frankie Valli and the Four Seasons as his clients.  But in 2005 Siegel sold off 85 per cent of Lisa Marie's share in Elvis Presley Enterprises, which saw her lose control of her father's name and image rights.  Siegel said the deal 'cleared up over $20million in debts that Lisa had incurred and netted her over $40million cash and a multi-million dollar income stream'.

Lisa Marie said it lost her millions thanks to a subsequent investment in Core Entertainment, the company behind American Idol that went bankrupt in 2016.  Siegel then allegedly began liquidating Lisa Marie's assets in order to supplement her trust income. She also claimed his business decisions left her with a $500,000 credit card debt.  In 2021, Priscilla reportedly sold her LA mansion for a profit to try to assist with her daughter's debt.  Lisa Marie, meanwhile, begged a judge to ‘declare her officially single’ from her Lockwood, after five years of separation. He refused to divorce her.  She said there was ‘no hope’ for the couple to reconcile and wanted to ‘move forward’ with her life.

25
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-11618919/Skeleton-Irish-Giant-removed-London-museum.html

Seven-foot-seven Irish giant whose dying wish in 1783 was not to end up in a museum FINALLY gets his wish as bosses of London's Hunterian rule displaying his skeleton is 'insensitive' (but refuse to let him be buried at sea off Margate as he desired)

    Irishman Charles Byrne measured 7 feet 7 inches tall due to a gene mutation
    He died in 1783 and for over 200 years his skeleton was hung at the Hunterian
    It will now be removed but it still won't be laid to rest despite calls to do so 

By Jonathan Chadwick For Mailonline

Published: 00:01, 11 January 2023 | Updated: 09:59, 11 January 2023

A skeleton of an Irish giant will be withdrawn from a London museum due to 'sensitivities' but it still won't be laid to rest.  Charles Byrne, an Irishman who measured 7 feet 7 inches tall due to a gene mutation, became a celebrity in 18th century London due to his immense size.  Byrne died in 1783 at the age of 22 and for more than 200 years his skeleton was displayed at the Hunterian Museum at Lincoln's Inn Fields, central London.  The museum closed in May 2017 for renovation work and is finally set to reopen in March 2023 without the skeleton on display.   Byrne had an undiagnosed adenoma a benign tumour in his pituitary gland, which caused acromegaly (overgrowth of the bones) and gigantism.  According to a statement from the Royal College of Surgeons, which runs the museum, Byrne's skeleton will not be displayed any more due to 'sensitivities', but it will still be available for 'bona fide medical research'.  However, it means Byrne's dying wish of being buried at sea will still not be fulfilled, despite repeated calls to do so.   The Hunterian Museum is named after Scottish surgeon and anatomist John Hunter, who arranged for the giant's body to be snatched when it was on the way to its sea burial.  'During the period of closure of the Museum, the Board of Trustees of the Hunterian Collection discussed the sensitivities and the differing views surrounding the display and retention of Charles Byrne's skeleton,' the college said.

'The Trustees agreed that Charles Byrne's skeleton will not be displayed in the redeveloped Hunterian Museum but will still be available for bona fide medical research into the condition of pituitary acromegaly and gigantism.'

Instead of being displayed, Byrne's skeleton will from now on be kept in store at the Royal College of Surgeons grounds at Lincoln's Inn Fields, as per Department for Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) guidelines.  However, some experts are concerned that students will still be able to see the bones during private viewings, which would still go against Byrne's wishes.  Born in County Derry in 1761, Charles Byrne set off for Britain in pursuit of his fortune in his late teens.  Skeletal evidence shows he grew to be 7 feet 7 inches (2.31 metres) tall, although some sources put his height at anywhere up to 8 feet 4 inches.  In the last years of his life, he made a living exhibiting himself as the Irish Giant, entertaining paying audiences.  However, his health declined and he descended into alcoholism before a tragic early death at the age of just 22.  
Byrne went to great lengths while he was alive to ensure his skeleton was not put on display after his death a fate then usually reserved for executed criminals.  He made arrangements with friends that when he died his body would be sealed in a lead coffin and taken to the English coastal town of Margate and then to a ship for burial at sea.  However, Byrne's wishes were thwarted when John Hunter arranged for the body to be snatched on its way to Margate, allegedly after bribing Byrne's friends.  Byrne's skeleton appeared in Hunter's private collection four years later and stayed on public display for the next couple of centuries at the Hunterian.  More recently, the museum has faced calls to lay the skeleton to rest, and after it temporarily closed for refurbishment in 2017 the Royal College of Surgeons said it would be 'discussing the matter during the period of closure'.

However, the college's decision, announced on Wednesday morning, may lead to fresh calls to give him a respectful burial.  Royal College of Surgeons said the skeleton will not be laid to rest partly because 'no written evidence exists' of Byrne's wishes.   The college also said Hunter and other surgeons of the time acquired specimens 'in ways we would not consider ethical today'. 

The late Dame Hilary Mantel, who wrote a fictionalised account of Byrne called 'The Giant, O'Brien', told the Guardian in 2020 that 'it's time Charles went home' and that his remains were taken back to Ireland. 

'I think that science has learned all it can from the bones, and the honourable thing now is lay him to rest,' said Mantel, who died in September last year. 

'It would suit the spirit of the times, and I don't see a reason for delay. He's waited long enough.  I hope there would be a welcome party for him [in Ireland], and I hope I can come and join it.'

In 2011, Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Queen Mary University in London, and Thomas Muinzer, a lawyer at University of Aberdeen, wrote an article in the BMJ advocating grant Byrne's wish and giving him a peaceful burial at sea.  Today, in a joint statement to MailOnline, they said: 'We are delighted to hear the news that the battle that we and others have fought to have Charles Byrne's skeleton removed from the Hunterian has finally be won.   There was never a coherent argument for the museum to do otherwise, given Byrne's explicit decision for his body not to fall into the hands of John Hunter for fear of what then precisely happened.  This said, we can see no justification for the Hunterian to retain the skeleton for "further research"; there is no obvious justification for this since DNA from the skeleton has been obtained and it is entirely unclear what further research the Hunterian has in mind.  Our suspicion is that the museum still wants medical students simply to see the skeleton in private, which again would go against Byrne's documented wishes.  Byrne's wishes should at last be honoured and his skeleton should be buried at sea, we think with great fanfare.' 

Back in 2011, researchers determined the cause of Byrne's gigantism by extracting DNA from the skeleton's teeth.  Byrne had a rare mutation in a gene called the AIP gene, which is involved in pituitary tumours.  The gene is still causing excessive growth in families in the same area of Northern Ireland where Charles Byrne was born.  It was his dying wish to be buried at sea so science wouldn't seize his body and make him a freak in death as well as life.  But the skeleton of Charles Byrne, known as the Irish giant who at 7ft 7in could light his pipe by a gas lamp, was left hanging in a London museum for more than 200 years.  Experts have called for his skeleton to be removed and buried at sea, as Byrne wanted.  Byrne was a celebrity in his own lifetime and when he died in 1783 at the age of just 22 after turning to alcohol to cope with his fame, the renowned surgeon and anatomist John Hunter was keen to acquire his skeleton.  According to a 2011 article in the British Medical Journal, Byrne was terrified of becoming one of Hunter's specimens and wanted to be buried at sea.  But the surgeon managed to bribe one of the Irishman's friends and took his body before it could be laid to rest in the English Channel.  Hunter boiled Byrne's body down to a skeleton and it became a key feature of his anatomy collection.  It was later displayed at the Hunterian Museum at the Royal College of Surgeons in London, where it remained until the museum was closed for refurbishment in May 2017.  In the BMJ article, experts acknowledged the role the skeleton has played in research, including by helping to link acromegaly an unusual condition where someone produces too much growth hormone and the pituitary gland.  But Len Doyal, emeritus professor of medical ethics at Queen Mary university in London, and Thomas Muinzer, a lawyer at Queen's University Belfast, were among those who said it is time to grant Byrne's wish and give him a peaceful burial at sea.  'The fact is that Hunter knew of Byrne's terror of him and ignored his wishes for the disposal of his body. What has been done cannot be undone but it can be morally rectified,' they wrote in the BMJ. 

'Surely it is time to respect the memory and reputation of Byrne: the narrative of his life, including the circumstances surrounding his death.'

They said Byrne's DNA has been taken and can be used in further research, while his skeleton can be replaced by a fake for the purposes of public education.  'As a sign of respect for Byrne's original desires, his skeleton should be buried at sea as part of a ceremony commemorating his life,' they said.

However, Hunterian Museum director Sam Alberti rejected the call, saying the value of the remains outweighed his apparent wishes.  'A vivid example of the value of having access to the skeleton is the current research into familial isolated pituitary adenoma (benign pituitary tumours that run in families),' Alberti said. 

'This genetically links Byrne to living communities, including individuals who have requested that the skeleton should remain on display in the museum.  At the present time, the museum's trustees consider that the educational and research benefits merit retaining the remains.' 

Who was the Irish Giant? 

The Irish Giant is the named given to Charles Byrne (1761-1783), a man who had a condition called acromegalic gigantism.  Byrne had an undiagnosed adenoma, a benign tumour in his pituitary gland, which caused acromegaly (overgrowth of the bones) and gigantism.   Due to his condition he measured 7 feet 7 inches tall became a London celebrity.  But his health declined and after he died at the age of just 22 his body was stolen when it was on the way to being buried at sea.  For more than 200 years his skeleton was displayed at the Hunterian Museum in central London. 

What is gigantism?

Gigantism is abnormal growth due to an excess of growth hormone (GH) during childhood.  Gigantism is very rare. The most common cause of too much GH release is a noncancerous (benign) tumor of the pituitary gland, although there are other causes.  Gigantism is treatable, but early diagnosis is crucial to prevent excessive height and other complications. 

Source: NIH/Cleveland Clinic

26
Faith / God Chooses Ordinary People
« on: December 29, 2022, 03:21:01 PM »
https://outreachmagazine.com/ideas/christmas/69969-god-chooses-ordinary-people.html?utm_source=omag-om-daily-nl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=om-daily-nl&maropost_id=714607821&mpweb=256-9594383-714607821

God Chooses Ordinary People

“God chose things despised by the world, things counted as nothing at all, and used them to bring to nothing what the world considers important.” â€”1 Corinthians 1:28

I think we’ve made Christmas too beautiful. We see it through a certain lens, and as a result, we’ve lost the raw power of the original story. We’ve added so many layers of tradition to it that we’ve forgotten what it’s all about.

For instance, we’ve romanticized the images of Mary, Joseph and the baby Jesus with halos and tranquil facial expressions. We have the wise men arriving on their camels wearing coordinating colors. (By the way, the Bible doesn’t even say there were three wise men; it simply says they brought three gifts.)

And we’ve certainly romanticized the shepherds. In the first century, shepherds were not popular people. They were very low on the social ladder. In fact, they were despised. They did the work that no one else wanted to do. They went out there and got their hands and feet dirty. So when the shepherds heard that the Savior was born in a manger, or a barn, they could relate to it.

As 1 Corinthians 1:28 reminds us, “God chose things despised by the world, things counted as nothing at all, and used them to bring to nothing what the world considers important.”

Isn’t that true? During Jesus’s earthly ministry, that was his modus operandi. He was always going after the outcasts. In John’s gospel, for example, we see Jesus showing mercy to the woman caught in the act of adultery. And in Luke, we find him going out of his way to speak to Zacchaeus, a tax collector who didn’t have a friend in Jericho.

That’s why Jesus was called the friend of sinners. God handpicked shepherds, who were at the bottom of the social ladder, to be the first evangelists with the message that the Messiah had come.

This should give hope to ordinary people like you and me.

27
Faith / Is the Reformation Yesterday’s News?
« on: December 29, 2022, 03:18:57 PM »
https://outreachmagazine.com/resources/books/theology/69994-is-the-reformation-yesterdays-news.html?utm_source=omag-om-resources-nl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=om-daily-nl&maropost_id=714607821&mpweb=256-9592728-714607821

Is the Reformation Yesterday’s News?

The Reformation still matters because the debates between Catholics and Protestants have not gone away. Today there are voices claiming that the Reformation is over. Any substantial differences between Catholics and Protestants, it is claimed, have faded away or been overtaken by more pressing concerns. It makes no sense, according to this line of thinking, to live our lives as if we are still embroiled in the sixteenth century.

In 1994 a number of leading evangelicals and Roman Catholics signed a document entitled Evangelicals and Catholics Together. While noting ongoing differences, this controversial document called for mutual acceptance and common witness. Among the signatories was the evangelical historian Mark Noll. In 2005 he published a book (with Carolyn Nystrom) entitled Is the Reformation Over? The answer, he acknowledges, is complex. But Noll claims that on justification “many Catholics and evangelicals now believe approximately the same thing.” Although he identifies the nature of the church as an ongoing difference, Noll says:

This accessible introduction to the Protestant Reformation answers eleven key questions raised by the Reformers, arguing that the Reformation remains vitally important for the church and is still relevant to our lives today.

If it is true, as once was repeated frequently by Protestants conscious of their anchorage in Martin Luther or John Calvin that iustificatio articulus stantis vel cadentis ecclesiae (justification is the article on which the church stands or falls), then the Reformation is over.

Highlighting numerous examples of cooperation, Noll says that differences between Catholics and evangelicals are “infinitesimal” compared with their shared differences with liberal Christianity and secular culture.3

Of course much has changed over the past five hundred years. On many moral issues like abortion Catholics and Protestants find themselves making common cause. And much has changed within both Catholicism and Protestantism. Both have been impacted by modernism and postmodernism. If the differences are narrowing, it is often because many Catholics no longer follow official papal teaching, and many Protestants are losing the biblical insights gained at the Reformation. We need a stronger, not a weaker, focus on Reformation theology.
An Ongoing Project

Sixteenth-century Catholics and Protestants both acknowledged they had much in common. That is not news. But they also knew the differences between them were fundamental. They could not be ignored then, and they cannot be ignored now. The fault lines of the Reformation have not gone away. Our contention is that on key issues like justification and Scripture the issues remain and are not negligible.

But it is not just in discussion with Catholicism that the Reformation continues to matter. The Reformation was always intended to be an ongoing project. One of its slogans was semper reformanda, usually translated as “always reforming”; but a better translation may be “always being reformed” (by God’s Word). It describes not a movement forward to some uncharted horizon but a continual movement back to God’s Word.

Five hundred years on, evangelical churches would be well served by a rediscovery of Reformation theology. The thought of the Reformers not only challenges Catholic practice; it also challenges many aspects of evangelical practice. The Reformers are not embarrassing grandparents—they are vital conversation partners with the potential to renew and reinvigorate our churches.

28
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11576745/Little-Women-author-transgender-non-binary-New-York-Times-article-claims.html

Little Women author Louisa May Alcott 'may have been transgender or non-binary' and her 1868 book contains 'proof', New York Times article claims

    The opinion piece claims that Louisa May Alcott may have been transgender 
    Academics in article state that Little Women author was 'certainly' non-binary 
    Scholars have shied away from using transgender term, stating it would not be appropriate use of it given the difference of time period of the 19th century 
    It is claimed that proof of Alcott's self-identity lie in her work and her letters 
    Some have taken to social media to disagree with the New York Times article  

By Gemma Parry For Mailonline

Published: 15:20, 27 December 2022 | Updated: 17:07, 27 December 2022

The author of feminist novel Little Women may have been transgender or identified as non-binary, an article by a trans New York Times writer has claimed.  Louisa May Alcott, who penned the semi-autobiographical book in 1868, likely did not identify as a woman, according to the president of the Louisa May Alcott Society.  Quoted in the New York Times,  Dr Gregory Eiselein says he is 'certain' that the author of the popular novel identified as non-binary, and that she never fit 'a binary sex-gender model'.  The NYT article author, Peyton Thomas who is a trans man and novelist himself goes on to claim that Alcott could have even been transgender.  In the opinion piece, Mr Thomas draws on a quote given by Alcott in the early 1880s, where she says: 'I am more than half-persuaded that I am a man's soul, put by some freak of nature into a woman's body'.

He writes: 'She may not have known the word "transgender", but she certainly knew the feeling it describes.' 

He also draws on her journal entries, in which she wrote: 'I long to be a man,' while in a letter she penned: 'I was born with a boy's nature, 'a boy's spirit' and 'a boy's wrath.' 

For decades, academics have shied away from arguing that Alcott was transgender, stating it would be an inappropriate use of the term.   Many have rightly agreed that a woman in that era wanting to be a 'man' is more likely them desiring to be taken more seriously in terms of rank, opportunity, and education rather than a want to change gender.  One key crux in the book is Jo March's character desiring to earn her own money as a man would so she tries her hardest to break through the gender norms of the time.  She also focuses on her career rather than her desire to be married off for love. This of course would have raised eyebrows in the 19th century, however scholars have fallen short of believing this means Jo and by extension Alcott herself wanted to be transgender.    'The way folks from the 19th century thought about gender, sex, sexual identity, sexuality is different from some of the terms we might use,' Dr Eiselein added. 

However, some academics have argued that the feelings of people during that era and transgender people in modern age are very similar.  Susan Stryker, a professor at the University of Arizona argued: 'The historical record shows that people have felt in remarkably similar ways to contemporary transgender people.'

In the article, Mr Thomas cites the example of a tweet written by tennis legend Martina Navratilova, who came out as gay in 1981, which read:  'Do you have any idea how hard you would try to convince me I am trans if I were born 50 years later?

'I would be 15 years old and you would be telling me I was trapped in the wrong body. So who exactly is guilty of 'Sex is a social construct' here?'

The case for Alcott's self-identity is based on a number of journal entries, letters and interviews.  It is believed that Alcott went by the name Lou among friends and family, and to have referred to herself as a 'man' a 'gentleman' and a 'papa'.  Many point to an interview with her late in her life in which she states: 'I am more than half-persuaded that I am a man's soul, put by some freak of nature into a woman's body.' 

However, later in the same interview, she is quoted as having said: 'I have fallen in love in my life with so many pretty girls and never once the least bit with any man', which has lead academics to believe that she was a lesbian.

One of the most popular characters in Little Women, Jo March, is based on Alcott herself. In the novel, Jo is depicted as a tomboy who does not abide by societal expectations.  Jo March has been serialized on screen by both Winona Ryder and Saoirse Ronan in 1994 and 2019.  Early in the novel, Jo says: 'I can't get over my disappointment in not being a boy.' 

However, scholars have avoided labelling Jo as trans, focusing instead on her sexuality, as is done in the novel.  Several readers of the article have taken to Twitter to share their views on the content.  One wrote: 'Women are and were real people with a variety of personalities, interests, desires, and “roles” in society, and it’s really gender-essentialist and misogynistic to claim that any woman who chafed at extremely stringent gender roles wasn’t a woman!'

Another disagreed with the content, writing: 'No, it’s a common 19thC motif in a context in which women had v circumscribed lives and to wish to be a man was to wish for more freedom and choice.'

While another added: 'I cannot stress enough how ridiculous and offensive this piece attempting to reconceptualize Louisa May Alcott as "transgender" is, and to what extent it shows why many feminists have entirely valid issues with "gender ideology.' 

However, others have been swayed by the argument, with one calling the article 'powerfully convincing' and another adding it reached 'reasonable' conclusions.  The author of the article, Mr Thomas, is himself a trans man and has written a coming of age book called Both Sides Now, which follows the story of a transgender teenager.  He is currently working on a contemporary interpretation of Alcott's famous novel. 

Who was novelist Louisa May Alcott? 

Louisa May Alcott was an American novelist best known for the classic novel Little Women and its sequels Little Men (1871) and Jo's Boys (1886).  Her first book, Hospital Sketches, was based on her own experiences in the Civil War in which she served as a nurse in Union Hospital, Georgetown, Washington DC. She had intended to serve three months but served just six weeks after contracting typhoid fever. She became deathly ill but survived, and went onto publish her first novel.  Between 1863 and 1872, she wrote at least 33 gothic thrillers for magazines, and novels under the name A M Bernard.  Her major success came with the publication of the first part of Little Women, a semi-autobiographical account of her childhood with her sisters. It was only when she met Thomas Niles, who encouraged her to write the first part of the novel, that she created part two, which followed the March sisters into adulthood. Little Men detailed Jo's life at the Plumfield School she founded with husband Professor Bhaer, which became the conclusion for part two of Little Women, thus creating the well-known novel of today.   She died in 1888 at the age of 55. She and her many biographers attributed her decline and subsequent death to mercury poisoning after being treated for typhoid fever with a compound containing mercury. However, modern analysis suggests she had a autoimmune disease.  She is now buried in Sleepy Hollow Cemetery in Concord, Massachusetts, and her home is now an historic museum.

29
Faith / 2 Significant Shifts in the Trajectory of Social Media
« on: December 02, 2022, 11:10:15 AM »
https://outreachmagazine.com/features/leadership/69774-few-pastors-left-the-pulpit-despite-pandemic-pressures.html?utm_source=omag-om-daily-nl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=om-daily-nl&maropost_id=714607821&mpweb=256-9573145-714607821

2 Significant Shifts in the Trajectory of Social Media
By Darrel Girardier - November 29, 2021

Recently Facebook changed its corporate name to Meta. It wasn’t just a name change, but rather a nod to where social media is going and what the future will look like. If you watched Mark Zuckerburg’s keynote you could easily get lost in all the technology that he presented. However, these new advancements that Facebook is presenting are nods to how social media is changing.  You may think that these changes will have little impact on your church. For the immediate time being, you would be correct. However, over the next few years we’re going to see a significant shift in how social media is used by the people who are attending our churches. Here are two ways that social media is changing:  Social media is becoming more private.

One of key things that social media companies are focusing on is how they can get you to share more of your life online. Whether it’s Instagram posts, stories or reels, the goal is for you to put more of your life online and thereby create more content for others to consume.  However, social media companies are discovering that young adults prefer to share content in friend groups versus to the whole world. One specific example of this is the increase in the usage of Apple’s messaging platform iMessage. Facebook has cited iMessage as a competitor for Facebook due to young adults preferring to share content to a select group of people.  The implication for the church is that while most older generations share their lives more freely on Facebook and Instagram, which can lead to more ministry opportunities, young adults are less willing to let you into their personal lives. Yes, young adults will still do TikTok dances and post images of coffee on Instagram, but they will keep the more intimate, real parts of their life for their close friends.  This means that you as a minister will need to focus on how you can best equip your people to have one-on-one conversations with people versus focusing on how many people saw last Sunday’s worship service on Facebook live.   Social media is fading into the background.  When computers were first introduced to the public, it was very easy to separate your digital world and your physical world. However, with the proliferation of devices that we use to monitor our steps (Apple Watch, Fitbit), our homes (Ring Doorbells) and kids (Disney’s Circle), we’re now in an era where you can’t escape technology. It’s so abundant that it is almost like it’s in the background of everywhere you go.  Social media is now fading into the background as well. Yes, we still actively consume it and create content to put on our social media accounts. However, the act of consuming and creating has be​​come so routine it’s now just a natural extension of everything we do. In fact, it’s gotten to the point where if we don’t post a photo of an event on social media then it seems odd.  This change presents some challenges for churches. First, if social media is becoming so ubiquitous, then how do we break through the noise and get people’s attention?

Second, how do we make sure that we don’t elevate social media to the point where it takes a higher priority than meeting the needs of our congregations?

Churches will need to address these problems in the next few years. There isn’t a quick fix, but there’s an opportunity to create a culture where social media supports ministry and not the other way around.  Social media is changing, but that’s nothing new. Facebook along with all of the social media companies will continue to find ways to get your attention and get you to share your life online. The question is, how will you prepare your church to disciple those who are online as well? 

30
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-housing-boss-finally-sacked-28533443?utm_source=mirror_newsletter&utm_campaign=daily_evening_newsletter2&utm_medium=email&pure360.trackingid=dc332faa-28fb-48e4-8537-38b9191e9675

Housing boss finally SACKED after two-year-old Awaab Ishak was killed by mould

Gareth Swarbrick had vowed to stay on as head of Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH) in spite of intense pressure to quit after it emerged Awaab, two, had died as a result of black mould in his home

By Dave Burke Senior News Reporter

14:06, 19 Nov 2022 Updated  15:12, 19 Nov 2022

The head of the housing trust which catastrophically failed tragic toddler Awaab Ishak and his family has finally been sacked.  Gareth Swarbrick had vowed to stay on as chief executive of Rochdale Boroughwide Housing (RBH) in spite of intense pressure to quit, after it emerged Awaab, two, died as a result of black mould in his home.  The toddler's parents, Aisha Aminin and Faisal Abdullah, had repeatedly told RBH that their home was dangerous, but their pleas were ignored.  This week a coroner ruled their flat was "unfit for human habitation".

There had been mounting calls for Mr Swarbrick, who earned £170,000 the year Awaab died, to be sacked. Today RBH, at last, admitted his position had become untenable.  Just yesterday, shameless Mr Swarbrick said: "The conversation around my position has begun to overshadow the most important part of all of this, which is that a family has lost their child.  Having spoken to the Board, I can confirm that I will not be resigning. They have given me their full backing and trust to continue to oversee the improvements and changes needed within RBH."

But in a statement today, RBH which Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Michael Gove this week told the Commons was guilty of a "terrible dereliction of duty" said: “Our original instincts were for Gareth to stay on to see the organisation through this difficult period and to make the necessary changes, but we all recognise that this is no longer tenable."

The statement continued: “As an organisation we are deeply sorry for the death of Awaab and devastated that it happened in one of our homes. We must ensure this can never happen again. His death needs to be a wake-up call for everyone in housing, social care and health."

Awaab died from a respiratory condition in December 2020 after his family repeatedly reported their one-bedroom flat was dangerous.  On Wednesday Mr Gove said it "beggars belief" that the chief executive was still in post.  And Tory MP Chris Clarkson described RBH on Thursday as "modern-day slumlords", saying that the chief executive should face the consequences of failings.  Downing Street this week said the circumstances in which Awaab died are "unacceptable" and the government will "no longer stand for" landlords failing their tenants.  A Government source said Mr Swarbrick's sacking was "welcome", but the board still had questions to answer.  The source said: "It is welcome that Gareth Swarbrick has been removed for his profound failings as RBH CEO, but RBH and their board still have very serious questions to answer.  Why did they give him their full backing after the coroner's report and as recently as 24 hours ago?  And why have they failed to answer basic questions about the state of their housing stock? The Secretary of State for Levelling Up will continue to take a very close interest in RBH and will stand up for tenants as necessary."

This week Coroner Joanne Kearsley ruled: "Awaab Ishak died as a result of a severe respiratory condition caused due to prolonged exposure to mould in his home environment.  Action to treat and prevent the mould was not taken. His severe respiratory condition led to Awaab going into respiratory arrest."

Following Awaab's death, RBH attempted to pass the blame on Awaab's family, Mr Gove told MPs.  He said: "Awaab's father first articulated his concerns in 2017. Others, including health professionals, also raised the alarm. But the landlord failed to take any kind of meaningful action.  Rochdale Boroughwide Housing's repeated failure to heed Awaab's family's pleas to remove the mould in their damp-ridden property was a terrible dereliction of duty.  Worse still, the apparent attempts by Rochdale Boroughwide Housing to attribute the existence of mould to the actions of Awaab's parents was beyond insensitive and deeply unprofessional."

In her findings, the coroner described Awaab as "an engaging, lively, endearing two-year-old".

She said Mr Abdullah reported mould developing in the Tweedale Street flat to RBH in 2017 and was told to paint over it.  In June 2020, Mr Abdullah instructed solicitors and initiated a claim over the recurring issue but policy meant any repairs would not be done until an agreement had been reached, the inquest heard.  A health visitor also contacted RBH to raise the issue in July 2020 and an inspection that month found mould in the kitchen, bathroom, and a bedroom cupboard needed treatment.  Labour's Lisa Nandy said: "It's very difficult to come to terms with the fact that in 21st century Britain, in one of the wealthiest countries in the world, a family can find their child dying at the age of just two years old through completely, utterly avoidable circumstances that could, would and should have been prevented."

She added: "Today has to mark the start of a real step change in the levels of urgency about improving the conditions of our social housing stock and the rights of people in it."

Ms Nandy said the tragedy should be a "wake-up call" about poor housing standards across the country, stating: "We stood in this house five years ago after Grenfell and said 'never again'. 'Never again' needs to mean something."

"It shouldn't take the death of a two-year-old boy... to get us together and act," she said.

"Our inboxes and constituency surgeries are absolutely overflowing with people who are in this position who have sounded the alarm over and over and over again and simply been rendered invisible by decision makers who don't respond."

She said that there are "no excuses for delay", saying that she was "wholly united" with Mr Gove's pledge to address failings.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8