Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - heartbroken

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8
31
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11286451/The-hidden-life-Britains-hated-woman-Maxine-Carr.html

The hidden life of Britain's most hated woman: How Maxine Carr had plastic surgery and has been moved 10 times in 18 years to keep her identity secret amid fears new Soham murders drama could blow her cover and force taxpayers to fund moving her AGAIN

    Maxine, starring Jemma Carlton and Scott Reid, starts on Monday October 10 at 9pm on Channel 5
    The release date comes 20 years after the murders of schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, both 10
    The plot will look at Maxine's tumultuous relationship with Ian Huntley why she lied for him to hide murders
    Carr who provided him with a false alibi was jailed for perverting the course of justice but released in 2004
    Her new identity, homes and protection has cost the British taxpayer millions of pounds over the years

By Martin Robinson, Chief Reporter For Mailonline

Published: 16:53, 6 October 2022 | Updated: 05:41, 7 October 2022

A controversial drama about how Maxine Carr helped cover up her lover Ian Huntley's child murders will air on Monday amid fears that Britain's most hated woman may be moved with the taxpayer again picking up the bill.  The first trailer for the new mini-series, Maxine, documenting the Soham murders through the eyes of killer Huntley's fiancée was released last week ahead of the broadcast of the first episode on Monday on Channel 5.  Jemma Carlton and Line of Duty's Scott Reid star as Maxine Carr and Ian Huntley star in the drama but critics have decried the decision to make the show so close to the 20th anniversary of the murders of schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, both aged 10 when they were killed in May 2002.  Despite her part in one of the most heinous crimes in modern British history, Carr has enjoyed a new life bankrolled by the taxpayer. She is reported to have been moved to at least 10 different safe houses since her release 18 years ago after just 21 months behind bars.  With the state protecting her identity, and guarding her around the clock, a dozen women are feared to have been abused or attacked by people who falsely believed they were Carr, who is now believed to be married with at least one child.  An insider has said the new drama will likely drum up interest in Carr's deceit and could see her move again with Britons picking up the bill. A source told MailOnline: 'Too much time and public money has been spent on her secret identity. They won't hesitate to move her again if her cover is blown'.

Carr left Foston Hall jail in 2004 after serving just 21 months and the cost of her new name, identity and police protection has cost taxpayers £2.5million or more.  Following her release taxpayers even picked up her £8,000 bill for dental work and cosmetic surgery to change her appearance.  Her hair colour and style will also have been changed. It was also claimed that Carr asked to have her shrinking breasts enlarged on the NHS for mental health reasons, claiming she was depressed because her breasts were too small.  On top of fees for a makeover, there is also the cost of probation officers and a psychologist to 'care' for her.   Carr moved repeatedly because of the reaction of people living in the area and in 2020 she was outed on social media, according to The Sun.  Her alias, location and a recent photo were reportedly posted and then deleted - but police were said to have moved Carr to a safe house after the leak and arrangements were made to relocate her, her husband and son.  The Soham liar is just one of a small number of criminals in the UK to be given a secret identity upon her release, believed to cost the taxpayer up to £500,000-a-year.  She was also give a home and is rumoured to be married and have children. Her alias and location is unknown and she is protected by a lifelong anonymity order making it illegal to reveal her new life.  Huntley, who received two life sentences for the murders in 2003, killed Holly and Jessica in his house after he invited them inside, but he insisted their deaths were accidental.   It is only recently that he has admitted he was guilty of their murders - and has said that he will never apply for parole out of respect for their families.  Before his conviction, he had told detectives that Carr who worked as a teaching assistant for their class at St Andrew's Primary School was in the house, but she had actually gone back to Grimsby to visit relatives.  Carr was jailed for three-and-a-half years for perverting the course of justice by covering for Huntley but only served half of her sentence.  Since her release from prison in 2004 it has cost the taxpayer millions to provide Carr with a new identity and police protection.  At one point she was living in the same coastal town as Tracey Connolly the cruel mother of Baby P. The area was dubbed the 'monsters-by-the-sea resort'. Furious locals complained that the town is being used as a 'dumping ground' for criminals.  It was chosen because of cheap housing and a high turnover of visitors and casual workers which should make it harder to identify ex-convicts. But this has not prevented residents from recognising their infamous faces.  In 2011 Carr gave birth to her first child a son at the safe house where she had been living under a secret identity. She said previously it was her 'life's dream' to have children around her.  However, the terms of the injunction are so stringent that their child cannot be told of its mother's true identity or her role in covering for Huntley. It means the baby could grow up never knowing its mother became one of the most reviled women in the country after the murders in Soham, Cambridgeshire.  And a separate court order may be necessary to ensure the child's identity is also protected. She is said to have miscarried twice after becoming pregnant by different lovers.  In 2014 she married her boyfriend who was willing to forget her past at a luxury wedding venue where his family were said to be 'horrified'. Her husband was described as being 'absolutely besotted' with her.  Maxine was given away by her mother who was jailed herself in 2004 after intimidating a witness who gave evidence against Carr.  A source said at the time: 'The families of Holly and Jessica will never get to see their daughters marry'.

Carr is one of only around five former UK prisoners protected by a lifelong anonymity order along with child killer Mary Bell and James Bulger's murderers Robert Thompson and Jon Venables. The most recent example is Britain's worst mother, Karen Matthews, who abducted her daughter Shannon and hid her in a divan bed to collect the reward money.  Played by Scott, a desperate Ian is then seen with his head in his hands, shouting: 'I can't go to prison,' before Jemma, playing Maxine, reassures him that nobody will be going to jail.

She is then seen standing on the doorstep of their home, where a policeman tells Maxine: 'Your story might jog a memory, help find them,' to which Maxine smiles and says: 'We want to help, don't we.'

Recreating real-life scenes which were broadcast to the nation on television news as she described the missing girls, Maxine says of Holly and Jessica: 'They were ever so funny. They were brilliant, they were kind to everybody.'

The police are then heard speculating that Maxine be keeping a secret, with a detective pondering: 'She used past tense because she knows they're dead?'

Maxine is then seen in the interrogation room as she insists Ian did not do anything to the girls.  In further chilling scenes, Maxine is then seen practicing looking serious in the mirror after Ian shouts at her: 'You tell me don't look so guilty. You don't look so cheery!'

The disappearance of the schoolgirls, which happened after a family barbecue in August 2002, sparked Britain's biggest-ever missing persons' enquiry but came to a tragic end when their bodies were found dumped in a remote ditch.  School caretaker Huntley then 28 had lured the girls to his house and murdered them before dumping their bodies and burning their clothes.   His then-fiancée Carr who provided him with a false alibi but was in Grimsby visiting her mother at the time of the murders was jailed for perverting the course of justice but released in 2004 with a new identity.  She was dubbed 'The Most Hated Woman In Britain' following the trial, which saw Huntley admit to killing the children, but claiming their deaths were accidental.  Channel 5 said in a statement about the drama: 'Maxine will examine the investigation of school assistant Maxine Carr and her caretaker fiancé Ian Huntley, who was later imprisoned for the double murder of schoolgirls Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman, the tragic case that shocked the nation  The three-part drama will explore their tumultuous relationship through Maxine's perspective; why she lied for him and how she became public enemy No.1, as well as reflect the scale of the police investigation and subsequent media frenzy around the biggest manhunt ever seen in British history.' 

Sebastian Cardwell, Deputy Chief Content Officer UK, at Paramount, said: 'The series marks a new venture into the true crime genre for Channel 5 drama and will give viewers an in depth examination of Maxine Carr and her role in one of the most notorious crimes in recent British history.'

Mike Benson, Managing Director at Clapperboard added: 'Few crimes have embedded themselves in the national psyche more than the tragic events of Soham in 2002. It was a case which was unique in recent history in terms of the sheer scale of the media coverage and how this affected and nearly derailed the investigation and subsequent trial. We will explore this within the drama alongside the role played by Maxine Carr – dubbed 'The Most Hated Woman in Britain.' 

Huntley was found guilty of killing both girls at his 2004 trial and later sentenced to two life terms, with a minimum 40-year tariff at the maximum security Frankland prison in Durham.  He was a caretaker at the local Soham Village College and was arrested after the girls' bodies were discovered 13 days after their disappearance.  During a two-week appeal to find the girls, Huntley gave TV interviews and joined in searches while his then-girlfriend Carr gave him a false alibi.  He was jailed for life in 2005.  During his trial, he said that he had 'killed the girls accidentally' but later admitted the killing in leaked tapes from prison.  In a 2018 tape he said: 'I know the people of Soham took me into their community, they trusted me, gave me a job and a home, and I betrayed them in the worst possible way.  And I am sorry for what I have done, sorry for the pain I have caused to the families and friends of Holly and Jessica, for the pain I have caused my family and friends, and for the pain I have caused the community of Soham.  I am genuinely, genuinely sorry and it breaks my heart when it is reported I have no remorse, that I relish something. I do not.'

He added: 'I can't change anything. I cannot remove that day from history, what I have done. I know those girls would be 26 this year with families of their own, jobs and lives. I thought about them when they were turning 21 and when they were turning 18. I know no matter what I say that people are not going to think any better of me but I would much rather people have the truth about how I feel. I have nothing to gain by saying these things.  I know I am never getting out. I have accepted that from day one.'

Huntley said he does not want to be freed from prison and insisted he will not apply for parole out of 'consideration' for his victims' families.  Maxine starts on Monday 10 October at 9pm on Channel 5.

Other women who received new identities after leaving jail

KAREN MATTHEWS:

Matthews was convicted of abducting her daughter Shannon in February 2008 in order to cash in a £50,000 reward.  She made emotional TV appeals for the return of her daughter who was being hidden in a Divan at her then-partner's uncle's.  In January 2009, Matthews was jailed for eight years but was released in April 2012 with a new identity.  She has been banned from seeing any of her children.

MARY BELL:   

Bell was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1968 having been found guilty of the manslaughter of two boys aged three and four who she strangled 'solely for the pleasure and excitement of killing'.  Bell killed Martin Brown, 4, and Brian Howe, 3, in Scotswood, Newcastle.  She was handed a new identity when she was released under licence from jail in 1980.

TRACEY CONNELLY:

Connelly was convicted of causing the death of her 17-month old son Peter, better known as Baby P in November 2008.  She was handed an indefinite life sentence in 2009 and was recommended for release by the parole board in 2013.   SHe was sent back to prison in 2015 having breached the terms of her licence but was again released earlier this year, despite ministerial objections.

32
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11244453/Prince-Harry-feared-nephew-George-turned-18.html

Prince Harry 'feared he would become a has-been once his nephew George turned 18': Bombshell new book also details bullying claims against Meghan Markle by her royal staff

    Harry, before he met Meghan, had ‘long-held’ fear that he would be an ‘also-ran,’ the loser of the contest
    This apparently compounded the frustration he felt when aides talked him down, a new book claimed
    Extracts of Courtiers: the Hidden Power Behind the Crown was published by The Times last night
    It also claims Meghan strongly criticized plan drawn up by young female employee in front of colleagues

By David Wilkes for the Daily Mail

Published: 22:04, 23 September 2022 | Updated: 07:26, 24 September 2022

The Duke of Sussex was ‘fixated’ about becoming a has-been once his nephew Prince George turned 18, a new book claims.  It alleges Harry, before he met Meghan, had a ‘long-held’ fear that he would be an ‘also-ran.’  This apparently compounded the frustration he felt when aides talked him down from things he wanted to do separately from William and Kate, the book says.  'Extracts of Courtiers: the Hidden Power Behind the Crown' by Valentine Low were published by The Times last night.  The book also makes claims about Meghan’s treatment of staff. On one occasion the Duchess of Sussex is said to have strongly criticized a plan drawn up by a young female employee in front of colleagues.  William later tried to comfort the unnamed staff member by saying she was doing a good job and the woman burst into tears.  After Meghan and Harry married, Samantha Cohen, the Queen’s former assistant private secretary, joined their team as their interim private secretary.  The book quotes a source saying that she, too, was ‘bullied’ and nothing she did was ever good enough for the couple.  Extracts claim a source once said: ‘Sam [Cohen] always made clear that it was like working for a couple of teenagers. They were impossible and pushed her to the limit. She was miserable.’

The duchess’s lawyers denied in 2021 that Miss Cohen had been bullied, saying that the couple were always grateful for her support and dedication.  They have also long described such allegations as ‘massively inaccurate’ and that the duchess has ‘absolutely denied’ bullying anyone.  While an inquiry launched by Buckingham Palace concluded it would review how it handled bullying complaints, it did not say that the duchess had actually bullied anyone.  The book also tells how Meghan clashed with her personal assistant, Melissa Touabti, over free gifts including clothes, jewelry and candles that some companies sent to the duchess.  Ms. Touabti, who quit just six months after joining the palace, followed the rule that members of the Royal Family cannot accept gifts from commercial organisations, but the book claims her approach ‘did not go down well with Meghan.’  The book is due to be published on October 6 by Headline Books.  In June, Buckingham Palace effectively buried a report into allegations of bullying by the Duchess of Sussex.  Royal aides admitted for the first time the findings would never be made public.  A source told the Daily Mail at the time: ‘People suspected it would be buried, and now it seems that it has.’

The Daily Mail understands that even those who took part in the inquiry haven’t been told what the outcome is.  Palace officials would confirm only that their investigation had concluded and ‘recommendations on our policy and procedures’ had been taken forward.  Royal aides announced in March last year that they were launching an inquiry into claims that Meghan’s ‘belittling’ behaviour while a working member of the Royal Family drove two female personal assistants out of the household and ‘undermined the confidence’ of a third.  Staff were said to have been left in tears and feeling ‘traumatised’ with some likening their condition to having post-traumatic stress.  The Royal Household employed a third-party law firm, paid for by the family privately, to probe the claims in a move that some predicted could increase tensions between Harry and Meghan and ‘the institution’.  The allegations have always been strongly denied by the duchess, whose lawyers described them at the time as a ‘calculated smear campaign’.  Last year a palace spokesman made clear that the specifics of the allegations which were brought to the attention of senior household staff at the time by Harry and Meghan’s concerned press secretary, Jason Knauf would not be investigated.  But they said they would investigate how the ‘historic allegations of bullying’ were handled by officials and whether any changes to their HR policies and procedures should be instigated as a result.  A spokesman confirmed that ‘if’ those findings were to be made public, they would be included in this year’s Sovereign Grant report the official annual review into the royal household’s public finances.  But announcing the report yesterday, the Master of the Privy Purse, Sir Michael Stevens, said of the investigation: ‘There is nothing on this in the report.  As we said last year, this work was undertaken privately and had no Sovereign Grant money spent on it.  The review has been completed and recommendations on our (HR) policy and procedures have been taken forward. But we will not be commenting further.’
 
Furious Prince Harry 'SNUBBED dinner with King Charles and William at Balmoral after bust-up when monarch banned Meghan from joining grieving royal family at Scottish estate the day The Queen died causing the duke to miss his flight'

By MATTHEW LODGE FOR MAILONLINE

The Duke of Sussex snubbed dinner with King Charles III and his brother the Prince of Wales at Balmoral after a row with his father when the new monarch banned Meghan Markle from joining the grieving Royal Family on the day the Queen died, sources have claimed.  Prince Harry reportedly wanted his wife to join him as royals raced to the Scottish estate to say their final goodbyes to their beloved mother and grandmother on September 8.  However, Britain's new King phoned his youngest son and told him it was 'not appropriate' for the former Suits actress to be there, according to reports.  It is claimed that in the ensuing row, during which Harry fought to persuade his father to allow Meghan to come with him, he missed a flight carrying William and their uncles Andrew and Edward to Scotland and with it the chance to bid farewell.  The prince who plunged the monarchy into crisis after he and the duchess sensationally quit royal duties and left the UK for California two years ago, before making a series of stunning allegations against The Firm was so angry that his wife had been banned, and that he had missed his first flight, that he refused to have dinner that evening with Charles, William and Queen Consort Camilla.  Instead, he ate with the Duke of York and the Earl and Countess of Wessex before leaving early the next morning, The Sun reports.  The Sun quotes a source as saying: 'Harry was so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and rowing with his family that he missed the flight.  Charles has an open invitation for Harry to dine with him whenever he is in the country.  But Harry was so furious that he refused to eat with his father and brother.  It was a massive snub. And he got out of Balmoral at the earliest opportunity to catch the first commercial flight back to London.'

The next morning he was the first member of the Royal Family to leave, boarding an early British Airways flight from Aberdeen where he was pictured comforting an airport worker after she passed along her condolences for his grandmother's death.  Harry headed back to Meghan at 8.28am, where he was sat alone in the rear of a Range Rover as he was driven out of the Royal Family's Scottish home, where he had arrived at 7.52pm the night before.  He was swept into Aberdeen airport at 9.20am, led by five police outriders, and boarded a flight to London leaving at 10am.  Harry wore a black suit and carried a shoulder bag as he walked towards the steps of the plane. An airport worker offered her sympathies as the Prince was about to walk up the steps of a British Airways aircraft.  The woman, who was dressed in a high visibility yellow jacket, addressed Prince Harry. The royal smiled and patted her gently in the shoulder before boarding the aircraft for London’s Heathrow Airport.  Less than 12 hours earlier grief had been written on the Duke's face after landed in Scotland following the announcement of Queen Elizabeth II's death.  He had his head bowed and partially covered his face as he was driven out of Aberdeen airport, arriving at Balmoral after dark.  The Queen's death had forced an unexpected reunion between Harry and the rest of the Royal Family.  The Sussexes, whose comments since Megxit has caused a rift with the royals, especially William, were not expected to see any royals during their tour of the UK and Europe despite staying yards from the Cambridges during their pseudo-royal tour of Europe until Her Majesty's passing.  Since then the pair have taken part in more than a week of national mourning with other members of the Royal Family.  Harry was prominent in a number of processions and services, walking behind his grandmother's coffin as it was transported from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Hall, and again as it was subsequently moved to Westminster Abbey for her funeral.  Meanwhile, Meghan joined her husband for the Queen's funeral and committal service on Monday, September 19, as well as for the coffin procession to Westminster Hall on September 14.  The pair also appeared to put on a united front with the Prince and Princess of Wales, heading out together to greet mourners and well-wishers at Windsor Castle.  It was claimed earlier this week that Meghan requested a 'one-to-one' meeting with King Charles in a bid to heal rifts before she left for California with Harry after the Queen's funeral.  Neil Sean, an entertainment correspondent who has appeared on NBC News, MSNBC and Access Hollywood, said that he had heard from a 'very good source' that the American actress had sent a letter requesting a private conversation with the King.  Mr Sean claims that Meghan wanted to 'clear the air' amid reports the couple would fly back to the US as soon as they can to see their children, Archie, three, and Lilibet, one.  'She'd now like before they return back to California to have a one-to-one audience with King Charles III,' Sean said in a video posted to YouTube, that has recorded nearly 300k views.

'That's right Meghan one-to-one with King Charles. You heard correct.  It's a very brave move from Meghan herself,' Sean said.

Detailing the content of the letter, he said: 'It would be an opportunity to clear the air, pull the rights from wrongs and explain some of the rationale behind what they've been doing over the last two years.  Now, you know, you have to admire Meghan's self-belief, whatever you think.'

However, in a twist, royal sources claimed it was 'very unlikely' that the Duchess of Sussex had written such a letter.  Charles is known to want to heal his relationship with his son and his wife, even saying how much he loved them in his first address as King, making it ‘very unlikely’ he would ignore such a request if it happened, one source said.  Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes have not commented on the claims, however royal sources told MailOnline that Meghan would be 'very unlikely' to trouble the King as he mourns his mother after yesterday’s funeral and as he grapples with his first days as King.  Another insider said it would be 'odd' for the Duchess to write formally to the King directly for a meeting, given Harry would have a direct path to his father.  While William and Harry have put aside their disagreements for royal events in recent days, fears over the content of Harry's upcoming memoir continue to cast a cloud over their relationship - especially following the bombshell interview he and Meghan gave to Oprah Winfrey in March 2021 when they accused an unnamed royal of racism.  Rumours of a rift between the brothers first emerged in 2019 when they divided their households following various disagreements about Harry's role, but their feud deepened amid the fallout from the Megxit saga in 2020.  But the death of the Queen has seen the rivals shelve their differences, with William and Kate joined by Harry and Meghan for the first occasions in more than two years since Commonwealth Day in March 2020.  A royal source told the Telegraph's Camilla Tominey that Prince William and Kate, felt 'the focus should solely be on this period of deep mourning and nothing else. The focus should only be on his late grandmother'.

Prince Andrew and Prince Harry were both again banned from saluting during the procession to Westminster Abbey on Monday while other royals including King Charles III, Prince William and Princess Anne all performed the gesture.  Members of the Royal Family saluted when the Queen's coffin was taken into the Abbey. But Andrew and Harry simply stood still because they were not allowed to wear military uniform, as neither are now working royals.  It comes after Harry and Andrew were also prohibited from saluting at the funeral procession to Westminster Hall. Andrew did also not salute at the vigil in Edinburgh for the same reason.  The decision to ban Harry and Andrew from wearing military uniforms in most events following the Queen's death at Balmoral is a reminder of how both now have limited involvement in the Royal Family.  Prince Harry spent ten years in the Army, but he was stripped of his honorary military titles in 2020 after he and his wife announced they were stepping down as senior working royals and moving abroad.  His uncle the Duke of York, who was forced to stand down from public life in 2019 over the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, is the only other royal banned from wearing military uniform at the ceremonial events and funeral.
 
Meghan was 'unresponsive' to Queen Consort Camilla's attempts to give her advice and support when she first joined the Royal Family, book claims

By Jessica Taylor for MailOnline

The Duchess of Sussex was 'unresponsive' to Queen Consort Camilla's advice to her when she first joined The Firm, a royal book has claimed.  A new biography of the Queen Consort, written by Angela Levin, claims the then-Duchess of Cornwall organised lunches with Meghan and did her best to welcome her into the family - but her advice fell flat with an 'unresponsive' Meghan.  An extract of Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall: A Royal Survivor, which was published in the Telegraph, Levin claims Camilla was keen to help Meghan at the beginning of her relationship with Harry after herself struggling to be accepted by the Royal Family, and 'warmly' welcomed her when she first arrived in London.  Levin added King Charles, who was then Prince of Wales, enjoyed Meghan's company and often spoke to her about theatre and the arts.  In an attempt to help the Duchess of Sussex 'find her feet', the Queen Consort advised her on how to handle the pressure of being in the public eye and the scrutiny she would face as a senior member of the Royal Family.  Levin quoted an unnamed source who told her at the time: 'She doesn’t want to see anyone struggling and she is fond of Meghan.'

Despite Camilla's efforts, Levin claimed the Duchess 'seemed bored' and 'preferred to go her own way' in carving out a role for herself within The Firm.  The author also acknowledged the Duchess of Sussex's reputation within the family for being an incredibly hard worker, noting the cookbook she made contributions to which had been put together by survivors of the Grenfell Tower fire in 2017.  Paying tribute to Meghan's work with the Grenfell community, Levin noted how the Queen Consort invited the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, plus Camilla's friend Lucia Santa Cruz, to lunch at Highgrove, and made sure the menu had been cultivated specifically from recipes in the Grenfell Tower cookbook which Lucia described as 'a really nice gesture'.  The account detailed by Levin comes as another royal book claims the Queen Consort 'spluttered over her tea' when Prince Harry suggested bringing in a third-party mediator to heal the rift between himself and Meghan and the rest of the family.  In The New Royals: Queen Elizabeth's Legacy and the Future of the Crown, by Katie Nicholl, which has been serialised in Vanity Fair, Nicholl wrote how relations between the Duke and Duchess and the rest of the family were most strained after Harry and Meghan did not come to the UK in March 2021 to attend the Duke of Edinburgh's memorial service.  At the time, reports claimed Harry had concerns over his family's security arrangements while in the UK.  Nicholl wrote that King Charles, who was then Prince of Wales, invited Harry and Meghan to tea just weeks after the Duke of Edinburgh's memorial service, as the couple stopped off in the UK before heading to The Hague to attend an Invictus Games event.  However, an unnamed family friend told Nicholl the meeting was 'awkward' and only lasted for around 15 minutes after the Duke and Duchess were late to meet then-Prince Charles and then-Duchess of Cornwall, Camilla.  They claimed: '[Harry] actually suggested that they use a mediator to try and sort things out, which had Charles somewhat bemused and Camilla spluttering into her tea.'

They added the Queen Consort told the Duke his suggestion was 'ridiculous' and that they would resolve their differences within the family.

Poll shows rise in support for monarchy

Support for the monarchy has increased following the Queen’s funeral, a poll shows.  Some 47 per cent believe Britain will be worse if it is abolished, the survey of 1,000 adults found up from 42 per cent who said the same in June.  Only 22 per cent said scrapping the monarchy would improve the UK, down slightly from 23 per cent. The poll also revealed that 56 per cent still expect the monarchy to last for at least another 50 years, up from 45 per cent in March this year.  The proportion who said Charles III will make a good King has risen from 49 per cent to 61 per cent, closer to the level of support for Prince William, whom 72 per cent expect to do a good job in the role when the time comes.  Kelly Beaver, chief executive of Ipsos, which carried out the survey, said: ‘King Charles starts his reign with the majority of Britons optimistic that he will make a good King and an increased belief in the longevity of the monarchy.’

Did Harry turn down dinner over duchess’s exclusion?

By David Wilkes

Prince Harry ‘refused’ to have dinner with his father and brother after Meghan was banned from joining the family at Balmoral on the day the Queen died, it was claimed today.  The Duke of Sussex, 38, was reportedly left ‘furious’ after King Charles phoned to tell him it was ‘not appropriate’ for Meghan, 41, to accompany him to the Scottish estate on September 8.  William took an RAF flight to Scotland with their uncles Andrew and Edward. But Harry is said to have missed it because he was ‘so busy trying to get Meghan to Balmoral and rowing with his family’.

Told to make his own travel arrangements, he landed at Aberdeen airport without the Duchess of Sussex minutes after the Queen’s death was announced to the world.  There was never any suggestion Kate would join William but the Sussexes were said to have announced that morning Meghan and Harry were on their way but by the afternoon the plan had changed.  Today, The Sun reported that Harry was invited to dine at Birkhall, his father’s home on the Balmoral estate, with the King, William and Camilla, Queen Consort the night of the Queen’s death. But he was said to have instead remained at Balmoral Castle with the Earl and Countess of Wessex and the Duke of York.  A source told the newspaper: ‘Charles has an open invitation for Harry to dine with him whenever he is in the country. But Harry was so furious that he refused to eat with his father and brother.  And he got out of Balmoral at the earliest opportunity to catch the first commercial flight back to London.’

The death of Queen Elizabeth: A timeline of how today's sad news was announced

12.35pm: A statement is released by Buckingham Palace, announcing that the Queen is under medical supervision at Balmoral after doctors became 'concerned for her health'. A Palace spokesperson said: 'Following further evaluation this morning, the Queen's doctors are concerned for Her Majesty's health and have recommended she remain under medical supervision. The Queen remains comfortable and at Balmoral.'

12.47pm: A statement is released by Clarence House, confirming that Prince Charles and his wife Camilla would travel to Balmoral. It said: 'The Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall have travelled to Balmoral'.

12.48pm: A minute later, Kensington Palace announces that Price William will be travelling to Balmoral. The statement read: 'The Duke of Cambridge is also travelling to Balmoral.'

1.37pm: It is reported that Prince Andrew has travelled to Balmoral Castle in Scotland following news that doctors were concerned for The Queen's health.

1.38pm: Sources confirm to the Press Association (PA) that The Princess Royal is at Balmoral, and the Duke of York and the Earl and Countess of Wessex are on their way to the Queen's Scottish home.

1.55pm: A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex confirms that the couple will be 'travelling to Scotland'. While the initial statement mentioned 'Scotland', it did not make directly make mention of Balmoral.  The Duke and Duchess of Sussex were due to attend the WellChild Awards ceremony in London on Thursday evening, but changed their plans to travel to see the Queen.

4.14pm: A news alert by the Press Association (PA) said that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were believed to be travelling to Balmoral 'separately' from other royals.

4.39pm: Less than 30 minutes later, PA issue another news alert, quoting an unnamed source, saying that that the Duchess of Sussex would not travel to Balmoral with the Duke of Sussex. The source said that Prince Harry would be making the trip by himself. A source said the Duchess could potentially join Harry in Scotland at a later date, following what PA described as a 'change of plan'.

4.44pm: Minutes later, Omid Scobie, a journalist considered to be 'friendly' towards the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, and who often quotes unnamed sources close to the couple, writes a post on social media network, Twitter about the situation. He wrote: A source has shared an update stating that only Prince Harry has made the trip up to Balmoral. Like the Duchess of Cambridge (who is in Windsor with their three children), the Duchess of Sussex is staying back in England (but still not attending tonight's WellChild Awards).' The post mentions Kate, who earlier in the day it was revealed would not travel to Balmoral.

6.30pm: The Royal Family announces via social media site Twitter that Queen has died 'peacefully' at Balmoral at the age of 96.

8pm: Prince Harry arrives at Balmoral following the public announcement

33
Fun, Games And Silliness / Frog
« on: September 18, 2022, 05:03:26 PM »
A six-year-old goes to the hospital with his grandma to visit his grandpa. When they get to the hospital, he runs ahead of his grandma and bursts into his grandpa's room.  "Grandpa, Grandpa!" he says excitedly, "As soon as Grandma comes into the room, make a noise like a frog!"

"What?" said his grandpa.

"Make a noise like a frog because Grandma said that as soon as you croak, we're going to Disneyland!!!"

34
Fun, Games And Silliness / FLU NOTES
« on: September 18, 2022, 05:01:29 PM »
FLU NOTES

(Notes pinned to the pillow of a mother who has the flu by a well-meaning husband who has inherited the house and kids.)

Monday A.M.:
Dearest: Sleep late. Everything under control. Lunches packed. Kids off to school. Menu for dinner planned. Your lunch is on a tray in refrigerator: fruit cup, finger-sandwiches. Thermos of hot tea by bedside. See you around six.

Tuesday A.M.:
Honey: Sorry about the egg rack in the refrigerator. Hope you got back to sleep. Did the kids tell you about the Coke I put in the Thermoses? The school might call you on this. Dinner may be a little late. I'm doing your door-to-door canvas for liver research. Your lunch is in refrigerator. Hope you like leftover chili.

Wednesday A.M.:
Dear Doris: Why in the name of all that is sane would you put soap powder in the flour canister! If you have time, could you please come up with a likely spot for Chris's missing shoes? We've checked the clothes hamper, garage, back seat of the car and wood box. Did you know the school has a ruling on bedroom slippers? There's some cold pizza for you on a napkin in the oven drawer. Will be late tonight. Driving eight Girl Scouts to tour meatpacking house.

Thursday A.M.:
Doris: Don't panic over water in hallway. It crested last night at 9pm. Will finish laundry tonight. Please pencil in answers to following:

1. How do you turn on the garbage disposal?

2. How do you turn off the milkman?

3. Why would that rotten kid leave his shoes in his boots?

4. What do you do with leftovers when they begin to snap at you when you open the door?

I don't know what you're having for lunch! Surprise me!

Friday A.M.:
Hey: Don't drink from pitcher by the sink. Am trying to restore pink dress shirt to original white. Take heart. Tonight, the ironing will be folded, the house cleaned and the dinner on time. I called your mother.

35
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11216931/JANET-STREET-PORTER-royals-dont-want-Britain-shut-Queen.html

JANET STREET-PORTER: Please stop this mourning madness. The royals don't want Britain to shut down for the Queen so why on earth are shops, GPs and even food banks so desperate to close as a ‘mark of respect’?

The Queen's funeral: All the latest Royal Family news and coverage

By Janet Street-Porter For Mailonline

Published: 19:36, 15 September 2022 | Updated: 01:48, 16 September 2022

Next Monday, the eyes of the world will be focused on the Queen’s funeral. This historic event celebrating the dedicated life of our longest-serving Monarch will be watched by millions. Meanwhile, the UK will grind to a halt.  If you need to see a doctor, grab a pint or a sandwich- forget it.  If you promised the kids a ride at the fun fair no chance.  Need shopping?

Go hungry, like the people who rely on food banks.  Thought you could collect your state benefits? Sorry, post offices will be shut.  Shops and schools will be closed, trains will be cancelled. The sick won’t be able to see a GP and weddings and funerals must be rescheduled. Long-planned operations will not take place, so the NHS waiting lists will grow even longer.  Heathrow airport is even cancelling flights during the funeral, so the noise will not be a distraction. I hope you won't be grounded.  If you’d planned a movie, a visit to the theatre, or a holiday break at Center Parcs?

Forget it. Not possible.  Supermarkets, restaurants and shops have been falling over themselves to announce they will be closed on Monday, as will much-needed food banks and post offices.  We have been told over and over again that every closure and inconvenience is happening ‘out of respect’ to the late Queen.  The Palace has let it be known this is not their wish - that they hoped the funeral could be held with minimal disruption to others. But when the government decided to make Monday a bank holiday the result is a national shutdown in the name of showing ‘respect’.  As he mourns his darling Mama, King Charles didn’t ask us to stop cycling, to only issue one weather bulletin a day, switch off the music in supermarkets and silence the tills.  The news of the Queen’s death last Thursday shocked us all, even though this remarkable 96-year-old had seemed frailer in recent months. We just weren’t prepared for the inevitable.  And then, after the official announcement, things started to go a little bit weird as big business, local councils, celebrities and pop stars all rushed to make sure the world knew how much they were grieving. Showing ‘respect’ in their own ostentatious way.  The Met Office immediately announced we would only expect one weather bulletin or warning a day ‘as a mark of respect’.  I bet (like me) you are secretly pleased not to be bombarded with amber weather warnings, hourly reports of mist and murk issued by a parade of women in cocktail frocks with double-jointed wiggly fingers, ordering us to ‘take care’ and not forget to pack our raincoats.  The day after the Queen’s death was announced, I was shopping in Morrisons and thought I was having problems with my hearing. The shop floor was eerily silent. No braying messages on the tannoy. No annoying jingles about super-deals. No bleeps from the till. Staff talking in whispers and even the customers were lowering their voices.  I went home confused and discovered that someone at Morrisons HQ had ruled that normal supermarket noise was disrespectful at such a sensitive time. It must be silenced ‘to show respect’.  Later, the store claimed there had been ‘miscommunication’ and the edict had simply been to ‘turn down’ the noise of the tills.  Even so, is this the best way to honour a beloved monarch?

Have the bosses of Britain PLC lost their sense of proportion?

At Center Parcs, bosses announced that they would close down completely for 24 hours from 10am on funeral day ‘as a mark of respect and to allow as many of our colleagues as possible to be part of this historic event’. Meaning that all residents and holidaymakers would have to pack up and leave.  There was a huge outcry from families whose holidays (already paid for) would have been disrupted. Where were they supposed to go?

Center Parcs relented and graciously said the villages would remain open for guests, adding facilities would be still be closed and anyone affected would receive a discount.  Mourning madness takes many forms: you may be surprised to know that cycling on the same day as the funeral is considered inappropriate after British Cycling issued a ‘strong recommendation’ that people did not cycle during the royal funeral.  After being widely mocked, they slightly revised their advice, condemning club rides, coaching sessions and community events.  All this is routinely justified with the tag ‘it’s what she would have wanted’.

I am quite sure the Queen would have wanted people to remember her in their own individual way. To have a quiet moment or two, but to get out and enjoy themselves. Not to be inconvenienced in their daily routines by her departure from this world.  Sadly, an army of pompous prats are making that virtually impossible.  In the days following the news of the Queen’s death, businesses rushed to let us know how much they cared about the late Queen. From Marks and Spencer to P&O Ferries and even the makers of sex toys like Ann Summers, no one wanted to be left out in this display of conspicuous mourning. Estate agents have been covering up for sale boards with black cloths or the royal coat of arms.  Cynics might say it’s a good way to link your brand with reliability, long service and dedication.  Even Transport for London decided to ban buskers during the period of mourning, conveniently forgetting that the musicians need to play to earn a living. It’s as if anything remotely fun or lighthearted must be swept away and replaced with grim austerity until the Queen’s burial is completed and she’s lying in the family vault in Windsor.  Kite festivals and Guinea Pig Awareness Week have been culled ‘out of respect’. Funfairs are closed, and cinemas will not be screening block busters in case they send the wrong message.  At least the Vue Cinema in London is staying open on Monday- you can watch the funeral on the big screen for free, and get a bottle of water thrown in. God forbid free popcorn or a packet of Maltesers is included- that could be seen as ‘disrespectful’.

36
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11203359/Prince-Harry-issues-statement-celebrating-life-Queen.html

'Granny, I'm forever grateful to you': Prince Harry issues statement 'celebrating the life' of the Queen jhremembering their 'cherished memories' from the first time she met his 'darling wife' Meghan to when she hugged her 'beloved great-grandchildren'

    The Duke of Sussex has paid an emotional tribute to his late grandmother the Queen in a statement doay
    He thanked her for her 'sound advice' and 'infectious smile' and described her as a 'guiding compass'
    Statement released today is understood to have been held back a day out of respect for 9/11 anniversary
    Follow MailOnline's liveblog today as more events take place following the Queen's death, by clicking here
    Full coverage: Click here to see all our coverage of the Queen’s passing

By Mark Duell for MailOnline

Published: 09:34, 12 September 2022 | Updated: 10:34, 12 September 2022

The Duke of Sussex today paid an emotional tribute to his late grandmother the Queen as he praised her 'sound advice' and 'infectious smile' and called her a 'guiding compass' through her commitment to service and duty. 

In a statement released today, which is understood to have been held back a day out of respect for the anniversary of the September 11 attacks, the Duke also said he wanted to honour his father at the start of his reign as King.  Harry also referred to his 'darling wife' Meghan Markle; said he was grateful that the Queen had hugged her 'beloved great-grandchildren'; and spoke of how he 'cherished' the times spent with the 96-year-old.  Today, King Charles III and Queen Consort Camilla were in London to visit Westminster Hall, where both Houses of Parliament expressed their condolences to the new monarch and his wife, with the King giving his reply.  Later, the coffin carrying the Queen's body will be taken from the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh to nearby St Giles' Cathedral where her family and the congregation will attend a service of thanksgiving for her life.  And Harry said today: 'In celebrating the life of my grandmother, Her Majesty The Queen and in mourning her loss we are all reminded of the guiding compass she was to so many in her commitment to service and duty.  She was globally admired and respected. Her unwavering grace and dignity remained true throughout her life and now her everlasting legacy.  Let us echo the words she spoke after the passing of her husband, Prince Philip, words which can bring comfort to all of us now: 'Life, of course, consists of final partings as well as first meetings.''

He added: 'Granny, while this final parting brings us great sadness, I am forever grateful for all of our first meetings-from my earliest childhood memories with you, to meeting you for the first time as my Commander-in-Chief, to the first moment you met my darling wife and hugged your beloved great-grandchildren.  'I cherish these times shared with you, and the many other special moments in between. You are already sorely missed, not just by us, but by the world over.  And as it comes to first meetings, we now honour my father in his new role as King Charles III. Thank you for your commitment to service. Thank you for your sound advice.  Thank you for your infectious smile. We, too, smile knowing that you and grandpa are reunited now, and both together in peace.'

Harry's statement comes two days after the Prince and Princess of Wales put on a united front with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex as they joined forces on a walkabout at Windsor Castle over the weekend.  William and Harry have a well-documented troubled relationship but the death of their grandmother saw the rivals shelve their differences when, with their wives, they viewed floral tributes left to the late Queen.  It is understood the prince invited his brother to join them in meeting well-wishers outside the castle, and a royal source said William thought it was an 'important show of unity'.  Two years have passed since William, Kate, Harry and Meghan were together side-by-side in public, during the 2020 Commonwealth Day church service on March 9, 2020.  As the couple's first engagement under their new titles, William and Kate were joined by Harry and Meghan as they inspected flowers and balloons before a walkabout at the castle on Saturday.  A royal source said the Prince of Wales asked his brother and his wife to join them in viewing the tributes.  The source said: 'The Prince of Wales invited the Duke and Duchess to join him and the Princes of Wales earlier.'

The last time William was joined in public by his brother at Windsor Castle was at the funeral of the Duke of Edinburgh in April last year.  Both couples left in the same vehicle as the engagement, which lasted more than 40 minutes, came to a close. All four were dressed in black as they walked along the gates of the castle.  The crowd was heard chatting excitedly and taking photographs as William and Kate and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stopped to speak to each person at the front of the barriers.  The royal couples walked along separately from one another, with William and Kate speaking to people on one side of the road and Harry and Meghan speaking to people on the other side of the road.  Today, large crowds are expected in Scotland today as King Charles III prepares to lead the royal family in a procession behind the coffin of his mother when it travels to an Edinburgh cathedral to allow the public to pay their respects.  The Queen will be taken from the Palace of Holyroodhouse to nearby St Giles' Cathedral where her family, and a congregation drawn from all areas of Scottish society, will attend a service of thanksgiving for her life.  Full details about the royal mourners have yet to be released but there is speculation the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and the Duke and Duchess of Cornwall and Cambridge, who on Saturday put on a united front during an appearance at Windsor Castle, will be part of the group.  Charles will lead some of the royals expected to be the Duke of York, Earl of Wessex and the Princess Royal and her husband Vice Admiral Sir Tim Laurence on foot, while the Queen Consort and other members of the monarchy follow in cars.  Members of the public will be able to view the coffin to pay their respects for 24 hours before it is taken to London to lie in state.  Later in the evening, the King and other members of his family, likely his siblings, will hold a vigil at the cathedral in honour of the Queen.  Charles and Camilla are in London and, before leaving for the Scottish capital, will visit Westminster Hall, where both Houses of Parliament will express their condolences to the new monarch and his wife, with the King giving his reply.  During his day in Edinburgh, the King will inspect a guard of honour at the Palace of Holyroodhouse before attending a ceremony of the keys on the forecourt.  At the Palace, the King will hold audiences with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon and, separately, Alison Johnstone, Scottish Parliament's presiding officer.  Words of sympathy will be expressed by the Scottish Parliament when Charles and Camilla attend to receive a motion of condolence, with the King replying.  Ms Johnstone told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that parliament will 'come together to express through a motion of condolence our deepest condolences to His Majesty the King and to the royal family'.

She added: 'The tone will be respectful. This afternoon gives us an opportunity to reflect on the life of Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, to pay gratitude for that life and to ensure that the royal family have the support the heartfelt sympathies of the Scottish people.'

Edinburgh City Council leader Cammy Day said on Monday the city is expecting large crowds.  'We're expecting tens of thousands of people to be up and down the high street as Her Majesty comes up to St Giles' and then onwards from there tomorrow,' he told BBC Radio Scotland. 

'Our advice to people is to get to the city centre as quickly and early as you can (and) use public transport because the city has diversions or road closures.  We are looking forward to welcoming tens of thousands of people to give Her Majesty the send off that the city will give her.'

Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said: 'The Queen loved Scotland and Scotland loved the Queen and I think we showed that yesterday.  I think we'll see that again today with the service of thanksgiving, and I think it is a fitting tribute to the late Queen that Scotland is able to play this role at this early part in the national mourning,' he told BBC Radio 4.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the King's appearance in Parliament will be a moment of 'reflection' and 'great sadness'.  'It's a part of Westminster which is resplendent with history,' he told Sky News. 'I think we'll all be very proud - proud of our country, proud of our amazing monarchy.'

Meanwhile, former head of the British Army, Lord Dannatt, said the armed forces have a 'special bond' with their monarch.  'Much has been made of the fact that when we join the Army, Navy, Air Force, whatever, we sign, we swear an oath of allegiance.  Seamlessly, when the Queen breathed her last last Thursday, our allegiance as soldiers of the Queen, we immediately became soldiers of the King. And that's a very special link that the military have.  We carry out operations at risk of life and limb, not in the name of the Government or the Prime Minister or the Secretary of State for Defence, we do it in the name of the sovereign and the people of this country.  That's a very special link, a very special bond. Actually, I think it makes the British armed forces themselves pretty special as a result.'

Duke of Sussex's tribute to the Queen in full

Here is the statement released by the Duke of Sussex in full.  'In celebrating the life of my grandmother, Her Majesty The Queen and in mourning her loss we are all reminded of the guiding compass she was to so many in her commitment to service and duty.  She was globally admired and respected. Her unwavering grace and dignity remained true throughout her life and now her everlasting legacy.  Let us echo the words she spoke after the passing of her husband, Prince Philip, words which can bring comfort to all of us now: 'Life, of course, consists of final partings as well as first meetings.'  Granny, while this final parting brings us great sadness, I am forever grateful for all of our first meetings - from my earliest childhood memories with you, to meeting you for the first time as my Commander-in-Chief, to the first moment you met my darling wife and hugged your beloved great-grandchildren.  I cherish these times shared with you, and the many other special moments in between. You are already sorely missed, not just by us, but by the world over. And as it comes to first meetings, we now honour my father in his new role as King Charles III.  Thank you for your commitment to service. Thank you for your sound advice. Thank you for your infectious smile.  We, too, smile knowing that you and grandpa are reunited now, and both together in peace.'

What will happen today after the Queen's death?

Here is the timeline of events that are expected to take place today following the Queen's death.  Monday marks D-Day +3, or D+3, in the plans for the aftermath of the death, codenamed London Bridge.  This is due to the announcement taking place late on Thursday, meaning plans were shifted a day to allow the complex arrangements to be put in place.

- The King and The Queen Consort will travel to Westminster Hall where both Houses of Parliament will meet to express their condolences at the demise of The Queen. Charles will make his reply.

- 12.45pm: The King and The Queen Consort will arrive at Edinburgh Airport.  Charles and Camilla will then travel to the Palace of Holyroodhouse, where the Ceremony of the Keys will take place. The King will inspect the Guard of Honour before being welcomed to his 'ancient and hereditary kingdom of Scotland' by the Lord Provost, and symbolically receiving the keys of the city of Edinburgh.

- 2.35pm: Following the Ceremony of the Keys, the King will join the procession of the Queen's coffin to St Giles' Cathedral.

- 3pm: The King and the Queen Consort, accompanied by other royal family members, will attend a service of prayer and reflection for the life of the Queen at St Giles' Cathedral.

- The King will then receive the First Minister of Scotland, followed by the presiding officer, at the Palace of Holyroodhouse.

- 5.40pm: Charles and Camilla will receive a motion of condolence, tabled by the First Minister at the Scottish Parliament, and attend a reception.  The Royal Company of Archers, who are the King's bodyguard for Scotland, will give a royal salute.

- The King, accompanied by members of the royal family, will then hold a vigil at St Giles' Cathedral.

37
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/meghan-markle-harry-monumental-row-27578854?utm_source=mirror_newsletter&utm_campaign=royal_family_newsletter2&utm_medium=email&pure360.trackingid=1d98e5a4-56c1-4dc0-99ba-a0c256dd40d1

Meghan Markle and Harry had 'monumental row' with royals ahead of final official event

Harry and Meghan joined the Royal Family at the Commonwealth Day Service in 2018 and author Tom Bower claims a 'monumental argument' ensued

By Rebecca Russell Royal Writer

13:19, 26 Jul 2022 Updated 16:21, 26 Jul 2022

Tom Bower's earth-shattering new book 'Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the War between the Windsors' claims to offer a behind the scenes insight into Prince Harry and Meghan's relationship with other members of the Royal Family.  The author reportedly spoke to 80 people who personally know the couple to reveal what really happened at some of the most talked about royal events of recent times.  One appearance that will be remembered thanks to visible family tensions and icy greetings was the annual Commonwealth Day Service at Westminster Abbey in 2020.  The Duke and Duchess of Sussex attended the event as it marked their final engagement as senior royals along with the likes of The Queen, The Prince of Wales and The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge.  Bower's explosive book addresses the service and explains how a "monumental argument" took place after "Palace officials decided to publicly humiliate [Harry and Meghan]".

Bower wrote: "Reality hit two days later, on 9th March. A monumental argument blew up after Harry was told that he and Meghan could not join the family’s procession through Westminster Abbey for the annual Commonwealth Day Service.    Although the order of service listed Harry and Meghan walking behind the Queen, Palace officials had revised their decision. Suspicious about the Sussexes they decided to publicly humiliate them.  Harry was told that having stepped down from royal duties, he and Meghan would sit and wait with the congregation. The prospect of the televised image of their isolation in the Abbey appalled them.  "By then they were keenly aware of Kate and William’s antagonism. William had not offered a brotherly welcome and Kate was outright distant towards her sister-in-law.  Eventually, to end the dispute, William and Kate agreed they too would wait with Harry and Meghan. As the members of the Royal Family filed into the Abbey, the frayed relationships could not be concealed.  Kate had blanked the Sussexes and William’s greeting was cold. Harry looked strained. Meghan’s face showed bemusement."

Further explosive claims from Bower's book involve the infamous row between Meghan and The Duchess of Cambridge over the bridesmaid dresses at her wedding to Prince Harry in 2018.  The author claims that Kate was already irritated with Meghan over complaints that she was allegedly bullying her staff accusations she has always strongly denied.  Bower explains that Kate was exhausted in the run up to the wedding as she had just given birth to Prince Louis. He claims that she was too tired to "cope with a disagreement about whether the bridesmaids should wear tights."

While this point of contention was known, Tom Bower writes that the pair had a second argument as Kate reportedly thought Princess Charlotte's dress was too short and did not fit.   The author says: "Kate burst into tears. Kirstie Allsopp, a friend of Camilla, would later confirm that Kate was reduced to tears by Meghan bullying her staff.  After leaving that unhappy scene Kate decided to make amends. She crossed the Kensington Palace corridor and presented Meghan with a bunch of flowers. Kate also told Meghan not to speak rudely to her staff. 'That’s unacceptable.’  What followed can never be irrefutably established. In Kate’s version, Meghan slammed the door in her face and threw the flowers in a dustbin.  Meghan would tell Oprah Winfrey that the tears were shed by her, not Kate, and the flowers were an apology. 'I think that’s where everything changed,’ Meghan rightly said."

The royal family have declined to comment on the contents of Bower's book.

38
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11051833/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-NOT-visit-Queen-Balmoral-summer-break.html

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 'will NOT visit the Queen during Balmoral summer break'

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle will not go to Balmoral to see the Queen
    Her Majesty has travelled from Windsor to her Scottish estate for the summer
    The Sussexes reportedly turned down an invite from the Monarch to visit

By Matt Powell For Mailonline

Published: 01:09, 27 July 2022 | Updated: 04:59, 27 July 2022

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle won't be visiting the Queen when she takes her summer break at Balmoral despite an invite, it is claimed.  Her Majesty reportedly asked the couple and their two children, three-year-old Archie and Lilibet, one, to stay at her Scottish residence and told royal staff to prepare.  It was said that the Sussexes would not have to spend time with other royals such as Charles and William.  However the couple, who last went to Balmoral in 2018, are said to not be planning to attend the Scottish Highlands estate over the next few months.  A Balmoral insider told The Sun and Page Six: 'Staff have been told to expect the full list of royals including Harry, Meghan and their children.  They are preparing for the Sussexes.'

Another sources is reported to have said: 'I would be stunned if they did turn up.'

It is understood the couple are planning to stay in the United States before the release of Harry’s memoir.  PageSix reports that Harry, 37, and Meghan, 40, are not expected to join the Queen because they have not been invited.  Harry last saw his Grandmother during her Platinum Jubilee, where he reportedly only had around 15 minutes with her.  The Queen was seen in Scotland last week, and will spend the months of August and September at her highland retreat, where she will be joined by other family members, including William, Kate and their kids, Prince George, nine, Princess Charlotte, seven, and Prince Louis, four.   Balmoral has had a number of adaptations in recent years, including her Craigowan Lodge, which was fitted with a wheelchair-friendly lift in 2021.  The castle was bought for Queen Victoria by Prince Albert in 1852 for £32,000, and it has been the Scottish home of the royal family since. She usually arrives at the estate in mid-July.  Princess Eugenie previously told how Balmoral was 'the most beautiful place on earth'.  She said on an ITV documentary Our Queen at Ninety in 2016: 'I think Granny is most happy there.  She really, really loves the Highlands walks, picnics, dogs, a lot of dogs, and people coming in and out all the time.'

Representatives for the Sussexes have been approached for comment.  News of the Sussex's potential visit comes just a week after the author of a new royal biography made bombshell claims about the Duchess of Sussex.  Tom Bower, author of a new insider's account of the royal couple titled Revenge: Meghan, Harry and the war between the Windsors, said the Duchess 'thought the royal family would be like Hollywood.'  Speaking to Ben Shephard and Charlotte Hawkins on Good Morning Britain he claimed that once Meghan realised the royal family was 'lots of work and little reward', she didn’t like it anymore.  The author said: 'It's wrong to say she was a famous actress, she wasn't, she was a third rate actress, Suits was only watched by a million people.'

During the interview, the author admitted that many of his sources were people who don't like Meghan because she'd warned her nearest and dearest her not to speak to him.

Host Ben said to Tom: 'She was a very famous actress. She had a high profile in Hollywood and Suits is a series that was streamed all over the world, so people knew who she was.'

Tom disagreed with the host, referring to Meghan's cover story with Vanity Fair while she was dating Prince Harry.  'Well we wont argue but I disagree with you,' he said. 'The point is, until she met Harry, even Graydon Carter the editor of Vanity Fair who commissioned the article never heard of her and never heard of Suits.  'He was just told that anyone who marries Harry is going to be famous and she indeed was.  She said to her father "I want to be famous, I want to walk down the red carpet" and marrying Harry she achieved exactly that ambition.'

The biographer went on to say he believes the royal family tried very hard to accommodate Meghan and include her in the family.  He claimed: 'People were very excited by the fact that there was a mixed race girl coming', adding: 'It was going to be a great development for the royal family.'

However, he said 'it went wrong' and why it went wrong he said he has 'explained fully' in his new book.

39
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11043497/Britains-forgotten-serial-killer-Patrick-Mackay-brutally-murdered-11-people-freed.html

Britain's 'forgotten' serial killer Patrick Mackay, 69, who brutally murdered up to 11 people including grandmother and a priest could be freed from jail before Christmas after spending 47 years behind bars

    Britain's longest-serving prisoner, Mackay has confessed to killing eleven people
    The so-called 'Devil's Disciple', 69, jailed for life in 1975 after axe murder of priest
    Maniac Mackay also killed pensioners Isabella Griffiths, 87, and Adele Price, 89
    Mackay, who now goes by David Groves, is a 'model prisoner' in soft open facility
    'It will be a strong board who approve his release the public will be outraged'

By Adam Solomons For Mailonline

Published: 11:34, 24 July 2022 | Updated: 12:00, 24 July 2022

'Devil's Disciple' serial killer Patrick Mackay, who confessed to eleven murders and has spent the last 47 years behind bars, could be released before Christmas.  Axe murderer Mackay, 69, is set for a parole hearing as soon as September.  The Kent and Essex killer, who split Catholic priest Anthony Crean's head in half with an axe in March 1975, admitted to a total of eleven murders.  He was convicted in 1975 for three: Father Anthony's, and those of pensioner Isabella Griffiths, 87, and grandmother Adele Price, 89, in Chelsea.  Having been locked up ever since, Mackay is Britain's longest-serving prisoner.  Now known as David Groves, the convicted killer is reportedly a 'model prisoner' at his soft open jail and is reportedly optimistic about his chances for a swift release.  A prison source told The Mirror: 'He really believes he finally has a chance to be released. He’s seen as a model prisoner.  In theory, there’s little reason to keep him behind bars, but it will be a strong board who approve his release the public will be outraged.'

Parole board decisions tend to take months, but can be made in a few weeks.  A swift decision to release Mackay would see him back on Britain's streets by the end of the year.  Mackay later retracted the eight other confessions, including the murder of Southend cafe owner Ivy Davies, 48, in February 1975.  Ivy's son Victor said he cannot give an account to the Parole Board as Mackay was not convicted of her murder.  He said: 'Everyone knows he did more. He hasn’t shown any remorse. But there’s not a lot I can do about it.'

A Parole Board spokesman told the paper: 'We can confirm the case of Patrick Mackay has been referred to the Parole Board. It is awaiting a date to be listed.'

Often described as 'Britain's forgotten serial killer', Mackay was born in 1952 and raised in an abusive household. He was regularly beaten by his alcoholic father.  Medical professionals saw that he had psychopathic tendencies and he was sectioned as a 16-year-old in 1968. Mackay was released four years later.  The murderer quickly developed a fascination with Nazism and often referred to himself as 'Franklin Bollvolt the First', frequently speaking of his desire to 'wipe out' the elderly.  Mackay's first identified victim was 87-year-old widow Isabella Griffiths, who was strangled and stabbed at her home in Cheyne Walk, Chelsea.   Next was Ms Price, 89, strangled at her home in Lowndes Square, Kensington.  Mackay then killed Father Anthony in a frenzied attack using his fists, a knife and an axe in the picturesque village of Shorne, Kent, leaving the 63-year-old's mutilated body floating in a bath full of bloody water.  Two days later he was arrested.  Yet Mackay's horrifying crimes probably did not end there.  Although he was charged with five counts of murder, Mackay's convictions were only for three counts of manslaughter due to diminished responsibility.  The other two cases were allowed to lie on file, meaning prosecutors believed they had enough evidence, but a trial was felt not to be in the public interest.  The first victim in this group was 73-year-old widow Mary Hynes. She was choked and stabbed at her home in Willes Road, Kentish Town.  Second was 62-year-old shopkeeper Frank Goodman. He was battered with a piece of metal pipe at his premises in Rock Street, Finsbury Park.  Finally, there were five unsolved murders, which Mackay allegedly confessed to while in jail, later telling police he was not responsible. The victims in those cases were 18-year-old Heidi Mnilk, Stephanie Britton, Christopher Martin, Sarah Rodmell and Ms Davies.  Mackay also admitted to killing an unidentified homeless man by pushing him into a canal. The body was never found.  He retracted his confessions for all but four killings, including the three for which he was convicted.

Patrick Mackay: A timeline of his killings

Patrick Mackay had between three and 11 victims as not all were confirmed. He was sentenced to prison for life in 1975.

1965: Institutionalised for trying to set fire to a Catholic Church

1967: At the age of 15 Mackay was diagnosed as a psychopath by a psychiatrist, he was committed to Moss Side hospital for four years

1972: Released from hospital

1973: Befriends Father Anthony Crean and soon begins stealing from him

1973, July: Kills Heidi Mnilk, an au pair girl, by hurling her from a train near New Cross

1973, July: Mary Hynes beaten to death in her Kentish Town apartment

1974, January: Stephanie Britton and her four-year-old grandson were stabbed to death at Hadley Green, in Hertfordshire

1974, January: Tosses a homeless person from Hungerford Bridge

1974, February: invaded the Chelsea home of Isabella Griffith, strangling her to death and knifing her

1974: Bludgeoned a 62-year-old tobacconist to death

1974: Sarah Rodwell, age 92, was beaten to death on her doorstep in Hackney

1974: Ivy Davies, slain with an axe

1975: Kills Father Crean with an axe

1975, March: Strangles Adele Price

1975 March 23: Arrested 

1975: Confesses, but not all crimes were charged to him 

40
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10941619/The-damning-verdict-police-failed-Rotherham-victims.html

Revealed: How police officers looked the other way while 1,400 girls were abused, trafficked and groomed by Asian gangs in Rotherham but still kept their jobs

    South Yorkshire Police 'failed to protect vulnerable children' from 1997 to 2013
    47 officers investigated by watchdog but all kept their jobs despite complaints
    Teens were seen as 'consenting to abuse' by police, according to investigation
    Officers were instead told to prioritise other crimes, the report out today found

By Tom Pyman For Mailonline

Published: 12:08, 22 June 2022 | Updated: 13:47, 22 June 2022

Almost 50 police officers all kept their jobs despite looking the other way while 1,400 girls were abused, trafficked and groomed in Rotherham, a damning report has found.  The long-awaited document by the police watchdog found South Yorkshire Police 'failed to protect vulnerable children' following a series of offences carried out between 1997 and 2013.  :( :(A total of 47 current and former officers were investigated by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) but none were fired, despite 265 separate allegations being made by more than 50 complainants.   The IOPC's investigation catalogued how children as young as 12 were seen as 'consenting' to their abuse by officers, who were told to prioritise other crimes.  It detailed how one parent concerned about a missing daughter said they were told by an officer 'it was a 'fashion accessory' for girls in Rotherham to have an 'older Asian boyfriend' and that she would grow out of it'.  The watchdog upheld 43 complaints made against the force. These blunders included:

    Failing to investigate an older man who was found undressed in a bedroom with one of the victims;
    Not acting when a criminal handed over a missing girl to them as part of a 'deal' not to arrest him;
    Doing nothing after approaching a parked car which a victim and her sister were in even though the abuser told them one of the girls had just performed a sex act on him;
    Telling one girl's father nothing could be done because of 'racial tensions' surrounding the investigation;
    Failing to safeguard a victim who was driven 180 miles to Bristol by two men.

IOPC director-general Michael Lockwood said in the report: 'We found that officers were not fully aware, or able to deal with, Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation (CSE) offences and showed insufficient empathy towards survivors who were vulnerable children and young people.  We saw examples of SYP seeing children, and young people, as 'consenting' to their exploitation, and a police culture that did not always recognise survivors as victims, or understand that, often, neither did those being groomed or abused.'

The IOPC identified systemic problems within South Yorkshire Police at the time, detailing how CSE in Rotherham was dealt with by a small 'overwhelmed' unit, which had a number of other responsibilities.  The report criticised the force for prioritising other crimes, such as burglary and vehicle crime, at the expense of CSE and it found 'little evidence that SYP's leadership identified, and acted on, emerging concerns about (CSE)'.  IOPC director of major investigations Steve Noonan said: 'Our report shows how SYP failed to protect vulnerable children and young people.  'Like other agencies in Rotherham at that time, it was simply not equipped to deal with the abuse and organised grooming of young girls on the scale we encountered.'

Mr Noonan praised the survivors of CSE in Rotherham who came forward to help his investigators conduct the biggest inquiry the watchdog has undertaken apart from the Hillsborough disaster probe.  He said 51 people made complaints, including 44 survivors, involving 265 separate allegations.  Of the 47 officers investigated, eight were found to have a case to answer for misconduct and six had a case to answer for gross misconduct.  Five of these officers received sanctions ranging from management action up to a final written warning. Another faced a South Yorkshire Police misconduct hearing earlier this year, and the case was found not proven by an independent panel.  In many cases, officers had retired and could not face disciplinary proceedings, the IOPC said. Only two cases reached the point of a public adjudication hearing.  South Yorkshire's PCC Alan Billings said: 'I am disappointed that after eight years of very costly investigations, this report fails to make any significant recommendations over and above what South Yorkshire Police have already accepted and implemented from previous investigations some years ago.  It repeats what past reports and reviews have shown that there was unacceptable practice between 1997 and 2013 but fails to identify any individual accountability.  As a result, it lets down victims and survivors.'

Dr Billings said: 'A great deal of time and money has been spent for few new findings or accountability.'

He said it was unfair officers have had allegations of misconduct 'hanging over them for so long', but said the force was now 'on a path of continuous improvement'.

South Yorkshire's deputy chief constable Tim Forber said: 'We fully accept the findings of the IOPC report which closely reflects those highlighted by Professor Alexis Jay in 2014.  The Jay Report brought a stark reality of our failings in handling CSE. We let victims of CSE down. We failed to recognise their vulnerability and failed to see them as victims, for that I am deeply sorry. They deserved better from us  The brave accounts of these girls caused a seismic change in policing crimes of this nature for South Yorkshire Police and the wider police service.'

Mr Forber said: 'Whilst I am confident we are a very different force today, I will not lose sight of the fact that we got it wrong and we let victims down.'

The town's Labour MP Sarah Champion said the report 'lays bare the appalling systemic failures at South Yorkshire Police'.  'It has taken eight long years, but the truth is now out for all to see,' she said.

'I know from conversations with survivors of abuse that their main motivation for engaging with this process was to ensure that no other children will be put through the hell they endured. We owe it to them now to make certain that that is the case.'

She added: 'South Yorkshire Police has improved, but there is still a long way to go before trust is rebuilt, ensuring the people of South Yorkshire have confidence in their police force again.'

David Greenwood, a solicitor representing 80 Rotherham CSE survivors said: 'It shows the British public the level of disregard shown by South Yorkshire Police to female victims of sexual exploitation, it explains that even by the pathetically low standards of the police service it was 'okay' to not investigate these crimes properly or at all, and it will demonstrate how the system of police complaints has provided zero accountability and needs reform.'

South Yorkshire Police's 43 blunders upheld as complaints by the IOPC

SYP did not deal properly with information that could have led to a CSA/E perpetrator being prosecuted earlier for their crimes.  SYP did not take safeguarding action despite officers regularly stopping a car the survivor was a passenger in, and that was owned and occupied by a perpetrator.  SYP did not investigate an older man after they were found undressed in a bedroom with the survivor.  SYP did not respond appropriately in a child abduction case which ended with the survivor being handed over to officers by the CSA/E perpetrator as part of a 'deal' not to arrest him.  SYP's dealings with the survivor were not in line with appropriate policy and guidelines.  Officers did not follow the right procedures when removing the survivor from a CSA/E perpetrator's house. Officers did not act appropriately after questioning a man after the survivor's return trip with him. The force did not do enough to secure a prosecution for men who exploited the survivor, or to obtain a disclosure from them about sexual abuse. That officers who responded to an assault the survivor reported did not take appropriate action, or follow the right procedures, when they told them their assailant had had a firearm.  Police did nothing after approaching a parked car which the survivor and their sister were sat in with a CSA/E perpetrator, and this was despite the perpetrator mentioning that they had just had a sexual act performed on them by a survivor.  The police missed safeguarding opportunities including when a traffic officer stopped a CSA/E perpetrator's car, when the survivor was alone with them.  A survivor's father spoke to the police about their daughter and sexual abuse and told us that the officer said to him nothing could be done because of racial tensions and this had been happening for a considerable time.  SYP was aware of suspects involved in CSA/E from the mid-1990's and, despite this, failed to adequately deal with perpetrators, leaving the survivor exposed to abuse.  The survivor felt they had not been given the opportunity to raise their concerns safely with police after they said they had been befriended by an older woman who introduced them to older men who sexually abused them.  The police took insufficient action to safeguard the survivor after a specific incident.  The police did not safeguard the survivor after an incident involving them being driven to Bristol by two men.  There was police inaction following concerns, in 2008, that the survivor was being sexually exploited, had been raped, and police did not record concerns relating to the exploiters.  The survivor tried to report a rape again in 2011, this time to a specialist sexual offences support officer at SYP's Apollo Unit, but the survivor said the unit was unhelpful.  That the police did not do enough when the survivor, and another survivor, ran away from two men who were being aggressive and followed them by car.  The police actively recorded concerns the survivor was at risk of CSA/E but did not investigate a number of incidents they were aware of.  The police disclosed personal information about the survivor during a 2010 investigation into abuse of another survivor by the same man. When the survivor formally complained about the above, they were assured the officer responsible would be reprimanded but that the survivor was not advised this had happened.  On three separate occasions, the survivor was in a CSA/E perpetrator's car when he was approached by the police, and officers failed to safeguard them or investigate the incidents further.  The survivor complained that SYP knew the perpetrator was involved in CSA/E but failed to stop them. The survivor who had been found after going missing, was taken to a police station but was, unacceptably, transported and locked in a small room. The survivor also complained that police officers regularly saw them in older men's cars, but usually left them with them, sometimes in remote locations, unless the survivor had been reported missing from home. Police did nothing after approaching a parked car they were in, with another survivor, and a CSA/E perpetrator.  The survivor was groomed and sexually exploited by a network of men and that SYP did nothing to protect them despite the force knowing of some of the perpetrators' links to CSA/E.  The survivor complained that police allowed the man to make a phone call from the police station and that he rang them, although their mother answered, and made further violent threats.  A survivor's mother heard about their daughter's risk via social services as opposed to the police, despite the survivor being involved in SYP operations. A formal referral was not made to social services, after a survivor was discovered by police at a house after they had responded to reports of a gunshot. Officers failing to recognise a survivor's vulnerability and did not submit 'concern for child' forms, to PPU, following incidents.   The force should have done more to protect the survivor earlier than they did, when they became a witness in Operation Central.  Police did not conduct an effective investigation into the survivor's suspected rape. An unidentified officer told the survivor's father that they might 'learn her lesson' after a suspected rape had happened. SYP did not do enough to find the survivor after they went missing from home. The survivor felt 'blamed' by officers they came into contact with.   While some efforts had been taken to respond to instances of abuse, there was an overall failure by SYP to understand CSA/E and take action to address it more strategically and consistently.

How child sex abuse scandal plagued Rotherham for more than 15 years: More than 1,400 girls were groomed, trafficked and abused by Asian sex gangs between 1997 and 2013 - as victim tells how from aged 14 she was treated like 'dead body on slab'

A Rotherham grooming gang survivor says her abuser treated her like a 'dead body on a slab in a morgue' and branded him an 'absolute monster'.  Sammy Woodhouse, 35, was sexually abused as a 14-year-old by ringleader Arshid 'Ash' Hussain and bravely waived her anonymity as a rape victim to expose the paedophile gang.   She was subjected to horrendous abuse including rape, assaults and coercion with threats to kill her family at the hands of Hussain, and in 1999 at the age of 15, Sammy fell pregnant with the 25-year-old's baby.  Opening up about her experience on Crime+Investigation programme Survivors, she told how she was 'completely out of her depth' as a teenager and had no idea how 'dangerous' Hussain would be.  'I was pretty much his sex doll; he was an absolute monster. I just felt like a dead body on a slab in a morgue', Sammy said. 

Hussain was part of a gang in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, who along with many other groups abused over 1,000 children between 1997 and 2013. He was jailed for 35 years in 2016 for 23 offences involving nine women, including Sammy.    'I grew up in Rotherham, about two and a half miles from the town centre', said Sammy. 'I was your average, everyday little girl I suppose.' 

From the age of four Sammy's dream was to be a dancer, and at 11-years-old she joined a national aerobics squad and began dancing all over the country

'It was great. We would get a minibus and go to my coach and manager's house in the morning and get your hair and make-up done and we'd all chant songs,' she recalled.

However when her grades at school began to slip, her parents pulled her from the dance team, with Sammy admitting: 'I started to develop a little bit of a lip, so my parents thought by doing that as a punishment would be the best thing.  I think for me when I stopped dancing it had a massive effect, it was something I focused my whole life around. So for that to be stopped and taken away, it did affect things.'

Without dancing to pass the time, Sammy began spending more time with her friends, spending evenings in the park drinking and smoking.  'There was a particular area where my dad grew up and he hated me being there', said Sammy. 'He always said if you go out you are not allowed to be in that area.  It was known for people going out smoking cannabis, drinking, my dad didn't want me involved in that and my life had gone from being a dancer to going up to the park with a packet of fags and litre of White Lightning with my mates. That was what my life was, that was cool for us to do.'

Sammy first met Hussain through a friend and she quickly became besotted as he groomed the teen by taking her out, buying her presents, and paying her compliments.  'I was on my local shop with a friend and he started to drive up the street in a silver Astra and I will never forget the first moment I saw him,' said Sammy.

'He was good looking, he was well dressed, he had a big gold chain on I was just instantly mesmerised by him.'

She added: 'I just thought, 'Wow who's he?'. He made me feel like an adult and I remember as a kid I always wanted to be an adult, I always wanted to be further on in my years than I was and he made me feel that way.'

While she was just 14, Sammy says she appeared even younger when the pair met  and that she quickly started spending more and more time with her abuser.  'Things between him and me escalated really quickly,' she said.

'I had a curfew and I was constantly breaking curfew and that's how my parents started to suspect things, because I was being late and sometimes not even coming home at all.'

Sammy was grounded when her parents found out about the relationship, telling how Hussain isolated her from her family by solely blaming Sammy's father for the family's concerns.  'What he did was actual very clever,' she said. 'He worked out the dynamics in my family, he knew my dad was more strict and my mum was more of a best friend. So what he did was started to turn me more against my dad rather than my mum.  So he would say 'Actually your dad doesn't like me, but your mum likes me, but she'll never admit it because she's scared of your dad'.'

She went on: 'I started to go missing quite a lot, not just for days but for months and weeks at a time.'   

Hussain was a drug dealer who Sammy says was feared in the area, but as a young and impressionable teen, she had no idea of the potential consequences.  'A lot of people feared him and for me where I live and grew up that wasn't necessarily something I had never heard of', she said, 'It didn't really bother me, it is what it is. You don't as a kid think about consequences, I just went with the flow.'

As well as sexual abuse, Hussain forced Sammy to participate in criminal acts, including driving a stolen car after a post office raid, a burglary, and 20 counts of criminal damage.  'I was completely out of my depth', she said, 'I didn't recognise it was dangerous and wrong I thought I'm a teenager having a bit of fun, how bad can things get.' 

Sammy escaped her abuser when he was sent to prison in 2001 for a violent offence, but was instrumental in exposing the gang after she approached The Times anonymously with her claims, leading to the Jay Inquiry.   

Survivors with Denise Welch premiered on CRIME+INVESTIGATION, with the first episode airing on Monday 19th April at 9pm

How Sammy Woodhouse has fought to protect others from enduring abuse 

Sammy Woodhouse grew up in Rotherham and was groomed by child sex gang leader Arshid Hussain when she was 14 years old.  She was subjected to horrendous abuse including rape and assaults and Hussain also coerced her by threatening to kill her family.  He also forced her to rob a post office aged 15 and when police raided Hussain's home later that year they found her in bed with him but failed to arrest him and charged her with possessing a baton.  Hussain also forced her to fight another girl a few months later, for which Ms Woodhouse was later charged with assault.  She missed much of her education and worked as a stripper and model. She eventually had a child by Hussain but fled to keep him away from his family.  After years of abuse she approached The Times anonymously with her claims, leading to the Jay Inquiry which exposed the Rotherham gang and led to the discovery of more than 1,400 victims between 1997 and 2013. Hussain was eventually jailed for 35 years.  Ms Woodhouse waived her anonymity on the BBC in 2017.  She has been leading campaigns to change the laws around child sex abuse victims, particularly supporting a bill named after her, Sammy's Law, that would pardon child sex abuse victims who are coerced into committing crimes.   The bill was supported by Vera Baird, the Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner, by Alan Billings, the South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner, by Anne Longfield, the Children's Commissioner for England, and by Simon Bailey, the Chief Constable of the Norfolk Constabulary, among several other chief constables and crime commissioners.  Last year she slammed Rotherham Council for trying to help Hussain get in contact with the son he fathered by rape.  She said the council should have opposed taking the step to give Hussain access as she fights for a change in the law to deny rapists access to children they have fathered in sickening attacks.  'They should've fought for that child,' she said. 'What they've done is hand my son over on a plate to a rapist.'

Ms Woodhouse conducts speaking events at schools and elsewhere, explaining to teenagers, the police and social workers how to recognise that someone is being groomed.  She also wrote a book, Just a Child: Britain's Biggest Child Abuse Scandal Exposed, which was released in April 2018.  In November 2018, over the first three days, more than three hundred thousand people signed a petition by Woodhouse and Labour MP Louise Haigh, which called for the amendment of the Children Act 1989 to 'ban any male with a child conceived by rape from applying for access/rights'.

Oldham Council leader apologises for 'failing' to protect children from sexual exploitation and grooming gangs after report exposes how one 12-year-old victim was sent away by police only to be repeatedly raped by five men

The leader of Oldham Council has apologised to victims of child sexual exploitation in the town - after a report said some had not been protected from grooming.

Cllr Amanda Chadderton said she would be writing to all the victims in the review and would be happy to meet them personally.

The report looked into the alleged grooming of children in council homes, shisha bars and by taxi drivers in the town and concluded there was no evidence of a cover up or 'widespread' child sex abuse in those settings.

Despite 'legitimate concerns' of police and the council in Oldham of the far right capitalising on the issue of grooming by predominantly Pakistani men, the authorities in the town, which suffered race riots in 2001, did not shy away from tackling the issue, the report said.

But the authorities did fail some children, notably citing the case of one girl identified only as 'Sophie', who was abused aged just 12, after 'significant opportunities missed' to protect her.  She went to Oldham police station to report being raped by an Asian man in October 2006.  She was told to come back when she was 'not drunk' and was instead taken from the police station in a car and she was then raped in the vehicle, then taken to a house and raped multiple times by five different men.  Both Oldham Council and Greater Manchester Police (GMP) should apologise for their failings, the report concluded, after being 'more concerned about covering up their failures' than acknowledging they failed to take action.  Cllr Chadderton said of Sophie: 'I will never pretend to be able to understand fully what she went through, but it's clear that the council and the police failed in our duty of care towards her both as a child, and the subsequent responses to her as an adult. For that, I am truly sorry.  It is clear that at the time, the police and the local authority did not understand enough about this horrendous crime and how best to support and protect its victims.  Much has changed since then. We've learned from similar reports and reviews from around the country. From changes to national guidelines and from best practice and the way we deal with victims of this terrible abuse is now completely different.'

The 202-page report is authored by Malcolm Newsam, a renowned child care expert, and Gary Ridgeway, a former detective superintendent with Cambridgeshire Police.  The report also details how Shabir Ahmed, the ring-leader of a notorious grooming gang in Rochdale, was employed by Oldham Council as a welfare rights officer and seconded to the Oldham Pakistani Community Centre.  Despite multiple concerns being raised about him and his arrest for the sexual assault of children, police failed to tell his employers.  'If this had happened, it may have potentially avoided the tragic abuse of other children…' the report states, citing 'serious multiple failures' by both GMP and the local authority.

Ahmed, identified only as 'Offender A' in the report, is now serving a 22 year jail sentence.  The report on Oldham follows an earlier damning report, centred on grooming gangs in Manchester, which said victims had been failed by police and local authorities in the city.  Maggie Oliver, the former GMP detective who turned whistleblower, said: 'Another day, yet another report about the failures of a police force to protect the most vulnerable in our society, even when there is irrefutable evidence to prosecute offenders and safeguard children.  This report yet again clearly evidences catastrophic failings by the force and their repeated attempts to cover up and hide these failings both from the victims and from the public they serve, and that is extremely worrying.'

Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, said: 'This report continues the process of shining a spotlight on past failures in Greater Manchester.  There were serious failings and victims were let down, particularly Sophie.  Whilst there was no evidence of a cover-up, we must not flinch from acknowledging shortcomings.'

A criminal investigation has been reopened in Manchester and police watchdogs called in to investigate former senior GMP officers following the grooming report on the city published in January 2020. Both probes are still ongoing.  'Victims and survivors let down': South Yorkshire's Police and Crime Commissioner lays into force as he claims report 'fails to identify any individual responsibility' over Rotherham grooming

The long-awaited report into more than 200 allegations of police failures in relation to child sexual exploitation (CSE) in Rotherham 'fails to identify any individual accountability' and 'lets down victims and survivors', a police and crime commissioner has said.  Of the 47 officers investigated, eight were found to have a case to answer for misconduct and six had a case to answer for gross misconduct.  Five of these officers received sanctions ranging from management action up to a final written warning.  Another faced a South Yorkshire Police misconduct hearing earlier this year, and the case was found not proven by an independent panel.  In many cases, officers had retired and could not face disciplinary proceedings, the IOPC said.  Only two cases reached the point of a public adjudication hearing.  South Yorkshire's PCC, Alan Billings, said: 'I am disappointed that, after eight years of very costly investigations, this report fails to make any significant recommendations over and above what South Yorkshire Police have already accepted and implemented from previous investigations some years ago.  It repeats what past reports and reviews have shown that there was unacceptable practice between 1997 and 2013 but fails to identify any individual accountability.  As a result, it lets down victims and survivors.'

Dr Billings added: 'A great deal of time and money has been spent for few new findings or accountability.'

He said it is unfair that officers have had allegations of misconduct 'hanging over them for so long', but said the force is now 'on a path of continuous improvement'.

Rotherham MP says report 'lays bare the appalling systemic failures'

The town's Labour MP Sarah Champion said the report 'lays bare the appalling systemic failures at South Yorkshire Police'.  'It has taken eight long years, but the truth is now out for all to see,' she said.

'I know from conversations with survivors of abuse that their main motivation for engaging with this process was to ensure that no other children will be put through the hell they endured. We owe it to them now to make certain that that is the case.'

She added: 'South Yorkshire Police has improved, but there is still a long way to go before trust is rebuilt, ensuring the people of South Yorkshire have confidence in their police force again.'

41
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10881529/Queens-Platinum-Jubilee-thanksgiving-service-held-St-Pauls-Cathedral.html

Harry and Meghan are reunited with the Royal Family as they arrive at St Paul's for Platinum Jubilee thanksgiving service - but the Queen is forced to watch at home on TV

    Prince Charles will officially represent the 96-year-old monarch at the service in London this morning
    It will also be attended by Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for first joint royal engagement in two years
    Queen will miss the event following after she experienced 'discomfort' at Trooping The Colour yesterday
    * Follow MailOnline's liveblog covering the Queen's Platinum Jubilee celebrations today by clicking here *

By Mark Duell and Harry Howard For Mailonline and Rebecca English, Royal Editor For The Daily Mail

Published: 10:42, 3 June 2022 | Updated: 11:24, 3 June 2022

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle arrived at St Paul's Cathedral today for the Service of Thanksgiving for the Queen, who is watching on television from Windsor Castle after she was forced to pull out last night.  Prince Charles is officially representing the 96-year-old monarch at the service in London this morning, which is also being attended by Harry and Meghan for their first joint royal engagement in more than two years.  But the Queen will miss the event following a last-minute decision announced by Buckingham Palace at 7.30pm yesterday after she experienced 'discomfort' during Trooping The Colour events earlier in the day.  There will also be no appearance at St Paul's from Prince Andrew after he tested positive for coronavirus. The Queen will be watching the service from her Berkshire residence, and it will be broadcast nationally on BBC One.  Political guests arrived ahead of the royals, including Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his wife Carrie, former prime minister Sir Tony Blair and his wife Cherie, Sir John Major and other ex-prime ministers Gordon Brown, Theresa May and David Cameron, and their spouses. Cabinet ministers Sajid Javid and Liz Truss were also there.  Soon after, Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon arrived with her husband, and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer. Members of the Royal Navy, British Army and Royal Air Force lined up on either side of the Great West Door.  The Duke and Duchess of Sussex had seats in the second row of the congregation, with Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie and their husbands, and Lady Sarah Chatto, the daughter of Princess Margaret, and her family.  Harry and Meghan were seated behind the Earl and Countess of Wessex who are in the front row with their children, Lady Louise Mountbatten-Windsor and Viscount Severn, and the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester.  Across the aisle, the Prince of Wales and Duchess of Cornwall, who have ornate chairs, had seats alongside them for the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and the Princess Royal and her husband, Vice Admiral Tim Laurence.  Earlier, a member of the Royal Air Force in the military guard of honour lining the steps to St Paul's collapsed, but was able to get to his feet and was helped away. Then, a second member of the military personnel also collapsed, but was also able to get to his feet and was helped away on foot, despite a stretcher being brought out.   The Queen is understood to have had episodic mobility issues yesterday and, in a statement, Buckingham Palace revealed the Queen 'greatly enjoyed' her birthday parade and flypast but 'did experience some discomfort'.  It said: 'Taking into account the journey and activity required to participate in tomorrow's National Service of Thanksgiving at St Paul's Cathedral, Her Majesty, with great reluctance, has concluded that she will not attend.'

It is understood the decision ahead of the service, which begins at 11.30am today, was considered regrettable but sensible due to the length of the journey and time involved and the physical demands the service would require.  Senior members of the monarchy attending this morning also include the Duchess of Cornwall, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who will be joined by the extended royal family.  Tributes will be paid to the Queen's '70 years of faithful and dedicated service' in front of 2,000 people including Prime Minister Boris Johnson, Cabinet ministers, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer and former prime ministers.  Public service is the theme at the heart of the religious event, with 400 people who are recipients of honours, including NHS and key workers who were recognised for their work during the pandemic, invited.  The Archbishop of York, the Most Rev Stephen Cottrell, will deliver the sermon to the congregation after stepping in at the 11th hour after the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Most Rev Justin Welby, contracted Covid-19.  Hundreds of people gathered outside St Paul's, some wearing Union flag hats and others hanging flags and bunting over the railings on the approach to the cathedral and many guests had their photographs taken outside the Great West Door, where members of the Royal family are also due to enter the cathedral for the event.  Mayor of London Sadiq Khan was cheered as he passed by the crowds already amassing outside, although the numbers appeared to be smaller than those seen at the Trooping the Colour festivities yesterday.  Today will be a first joint engagement with senior royals for Meghan and Harry since the frosty Commonwealth Service at Westminster Abbey in March 2020 shortly before they officially stepped down as senior royals.  And while the couple are set to remain below radar in public, the Queen had lunch with them and other senior royals behind closed doors yesterday and also met her great-granddaughter Lilibet for the first time.  The Sussexes introduced their little girl to the Queen nicknamed Lilibet as a child - yesterday at Windsor after attending a private Royal Family lunch at Buckingham Palace following Trooping the Colour.  Harry and Meghan are expected to remain mostly low-profile over the four-day Jubilee weekend, with no sign of the Netflix cameras that followed them around at the Invictus Games in the Netherlands in April.  The Sussexes, who are staying at Frogmore Cottage in Windsor while visiting from California, were not allowed on the Buckingham Palace balcony yesterday and instead watched proceedings from Horse Guards Parade.  Meanwhile key workers, charity volunteers and members of the armed forces have been invited to the Queen's service of thanksgiving at St Paul's today in recognition of their contribution to public life.  More than 400 people, who have been making a difference either nationally or locally, are among the guests and many have been working tirelessly during the pandemic.  They will join members of the royal family at St Paul's Cathedral to celebrate the monarch's 70-year reign, although the Queen herself will not attend after experiencing 'some discomfort' during Thursday's events following previous mobility issues.  The Bishop of London said today that she is 'excited' ahead of the thanksgiving service. Rt Revd and Rt Hon Dame Sarah Mullally, who will be leading the blessing at St Paul's, told BBC Breakfast: 'I'm excited, I think.'

She added that she was nervous about the ceremonial regalia she needs to wear. 'It's a coat called the George V coat.  'It's quite an old coat, which is a cape and it sits on me, but of course it was designed for men because I'm the first woman who happens to be the Bishop of London,' she said. 'So, it doesn't sit quite as well on me, so I'm slightly nervous.'

She said that Her Majesty's Christian faith has 'always shaped her' and she feels privileged to play a part in the service and 'give thanks' to The Queen for her service to the country.  And the Dean of St Paul's said today's thanksgiving service represents the nation 'picking up the baton' from The Queen as a thank you for her years of service.

The Very Revd Dr David Ison told BBC Breakfast: 'I think, for me, what this service is about, is saying not only thank you, but also we are picking up the baton of what The Queen has done. We ourselves are committing to how we can make the world a better place.'

He said of the service: 'I always get nervous. You can't help it because you want it to go well and therefore you're nervous to make sure it does goes well and worried about what might go wrong.'

He also spoke about an incident during the Queen's Diamond Jubilee when his cape ripped.  'I put on my cape and I was bounding down the stairs of the vestry and I caught the cape on the door latch and ripped it and this is in the afternoon, before the service.  So, they had an emergency embroiderer who came in early in the morning to stitch it back up again.'

Later, Dr David will say in The Bidding: 'We come together in this Cathedral Church today to offer to God our thanks and praise for the reign of Her Majesty the Queen and especially for her 70 years of faithful and dedicated service.  As we gather from communities across her realm and the Commonwealth of Nations, we rejoice in the diverse and varied lives of all those whom she serves, and in the beauty and abundance of the world in which we live.  Inspired by words and music, we pray that God will continue to bless and guide Her Majesty, and that we may all receive grace to honour life and to live in harmony with one another; and we continue to pray for those whose lives are marred by conflict, suffering and tragedy.  And mindful of the call of God to look to the needs of others, we commit ourselves afresh to caring for our world and all for whom it is home, striving always to seek out and nurture that which is good in people and in all creation.'

Those invited in recognition of their service have all been recipients of honours in the New Year or Birthday Honours lists and their number also includes public servants and representatives from social enterprises and voluntary groups.  Boris Johnson, who will give a New Testament reading, and members of his Cabinet are among the guests along with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, first ministers of the devolved governments and former prime ministers.  The diplomatic world will be represented by high commissioners and ambassadors from across the world and also attending are governors general and clergy from world faiths.  The Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell will give the sermon after the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby tested positive for Covid-19.  The Dean of the Chapel Royal, Dame Sarah Mullally, Bishop of London, will give the Collect and the Blessing, and the Dean of St Paul's will conduct the service.  Young people representing countries where the Queen is head of state will lead the 'Act of Commitment' celebrating the life and reign of the monarch, led by the Reverend Robert Kozak.  During the day, one of the country's largest bells, the Great Paul, will be rung before and after the service, the first time it will have been heard at a royal occasion.  The event will feature a new anthem by Judith Weir, Master of the Queen's Music, that sets to music words from the third Chapter of the Book of Proverbs.  Bible readings, hymns and prayers to express thankfulness for the Queen's reign, faith and service will also be heard by the congregation as the nation marks the monarch's 70 years on the throne.  Before the service begins, the Band of Her Majesty's Royal Marines Portsmouth (Royal Band), will play as the congregation arrives and the State Trumpeters of the Household Cavalry will perform to mark royal arrivals, while the Fanfare Trumpeters of the Central Band of the Royal Air Force will accompany later in the service.  The choirs of St Paul's Cathedral and Her Majesty's Chapel Royal will join together to sing the Vivats, I Was Glad by Sir Hubert Parry, performed at every coronation and now for the Queen's Platinum Jubilee.  News of the Queen's meeting with Lilibet yesterday which comes ahead of her first birthday tomorrow was revealed on BBC Breakfast this morning by royal commentator Omid Scobie, who is friendly with the Sussexes.   He said: 'I think people are expecting some sort of big birthday extravagant event, that we're going to see photographs from. From what I'm told, we shouldn't expect anything.  Those moments with Lilibet are very much private between them and the Queen and of course we know how much she's been looking forward to it.  They've been held back by a pandemic. Of course the times that Harry has been here it's just been by himself for quite sombre occasions. And so this really was the first time.  Of course we know the Queen went back to Windsor Castle yesterday, the couple went back to Windsor as well where they're staying at Frogmore Cottage. So that would have been the first moment or the first chance for her to meet her namesake.'

Yesterday, Harry and Meghan made a concerted effort not to be seen by prying eyes as they watched Trooping the Colour yesterday, arriving incognito at Horse Guards Parade and studiously keeping away from most although not all of the waiting photographers.  The couple arrived in the UK on Wednesday afternoon, flying in by private jet from Los Angeles to Farnborough Airport in Hampshire, where they were picked up by royal bodyguards and taken to Frogmore Cottage.  Yesterday a Range Rover with a modest escort swept them into Central London and onto Whitehall, where they took up position in the Major General's Office overlooking the parade ground ready for the other royals to arrive.  Among the first to greet them were Princess Beatrice and her husband, Edo, as well as the Queen's grandson Peter Phillips.  Meghan was seen kissing his elder daughter, Savannah, 11, as his younger daughter, Isla, 10, held Zara and Mike Tindall's younger daughter Lena, almost four.  As Princess Beatrice's husband, Edo Mapelli-Mozzi, looked on, Meghan, 40, appeared to be sharing a secret with the youngsters, who were joined by the Tindalls' eldest daughter Mia, eight.  Meghan, wearing a large wide-brimmed navy and white hat, put her finger mysteriously to her lips as the girls mimicked her, laughing.  Her husband, Harry, 37, who looked tanned in a lounge suit rather than military uniform, was also seen later entering into the spirit of things, apparently urging Lena to 'shush'.  The couple were later seen chatting to the Queen's cousin, the Duke of Kent, 86, before he left the family gathering to join the monarch at Buckingham Palace, where they took the returning military salute together.  Last month Buckingham Palace revealed that the Queen had personally decided to only invite working members of the Royal Family and some of their children onto the Buckingham Palace balcony with her.  This neatly sidestepped the tricky issue about what to do with Harry, Meghan and Andrew who have all quit royal duties.  But while Andrew wasn't invited to join the family following his shaming over his links to billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, she did extend an olive branch to the Sussexes to join other family members at Horse Guards to watch the parade from the windows of the Duke of Wellington's old office.  Those on the Buckingham Palace balcony also included the Duchess of Cornwall, the Duchess of Cambridge and her three children Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis after they had arrived by carriage along with the Earl and Countess of Wessex and their two children, the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester and Princess Anne's husband, Vice Admiral Sir Tim Laurence.  Princess Alexandra, Prince and Princess Michael of Kent were also present as well as the children of Princess Margaret, Lord Snowden and Lady Sarah Chatto, and their families.  As for Harry and Meghan, Mr Scobie told BBC Breakfast today that he 'spoke to people close to the couple' who said that the couple 'wanted to be as low profile as possible during this trip'.

He continued: 'It is almost hard to believe, but I think that yesterday at Trooping the Colour was a great example. We didn't really catch sight of them on TV cameras. There were a few grainy photos of them in existence online but that is about as far as it goes.  And for them being here is all about honouring and really celebrating the life and legacy of the Queen. Someone that they have continued a very warm and close relationship with.   Of course we know that is not the same with the other family members and today will be very interesting to see them alongside some of them.  I was with the couple on their last day in the UK, on Meghan's last engagement, and of course we remember they also went on to that Westminster Abbey Commonwealth service.   Very awkward moments between the Sussexes and the Cambridges. It was almost sort of at the peak of the tensions between them and the institutions of the monarchy.  A lot of that has softened since then. It doesn't mean that the relationships have necessarily gotten back on track to how they once were. I think all eyes will be on them today just to see how they all are with the other members of the family.  But of course everyone is here to celebrate the faith, the reign and the lifetime of service of the Queen.  And I think for them, despite the fact that they broke away from the firm, they always said that they had carried out their work. Holding, upholding the same principles and values as Her Majesty.'

However, royal expert Angela Levin told Talk TV: 'I felt when I saw them 'what are you doing here, you are irrelevant, why are you here? I was very angry when they wound the window down of their car.’

She added: 'My instinct was that 'what are you doing here'. I don't think you can trash someone and then turn up with smiles.'

42
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10842379/Boy-10-diagnosed-nerve-condition-begs-mother-leg-AMPUTATED.html

Boy, 10, who was diagnosed with nerve condition so painful that its called 'suicide disease' begs his mother to get his leg AMPUTATED to ease his suffering

    10-year-old boy has begged his mother to get his leg amputated due to pain
    Dillon Wilford was diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in January
    Youngster suffers with horrific pain that has left him sensitive to slightest touch
    Mother Melanie set up £100k GoFundMe to raise money for surgery in the US

By Kaya Terry For Mailonline

Published: 16:11, 22 May 2022 | Updated: 16:14, 22 May 2022

A schoolboy who was diagnosed with a debilitating nerve condition has begged his mother to get his leg amputated to ease his suffering and told her he 'wanted to die'.  Dillon Wilford, 10, was a 'happy and healthy child' until he woke up in November 2021 with a limp and 'severe pain' in his right leg. ter three months of waiting for a diagnosis, doctors said the youngster was suffering from Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), a condition that causes extreme discomfort that does not ease.  The condition is often referred to as 'the suicide disease' because there is no cure and limited effective treatments even the slightest touch to the affected area causes severe pain.  Dillon, of Sharples, Greater Manchester, has subsequently had to stop going to school because of the extreme pain and even begged his mother, Melanie, 47, to have his leg 'amputated'.  The single mother-of-four is now trying to raise £100,000 to take Dillon to America to get specialised treatment that's not available in the UK.  Ms Wilford said: 'One day he was eating a strawberry one tiny seed fell off and hit his leg and he screamed. If he gets a cat hair on his leg, he screams.'

She added: 'It's 12cm above his knee all the way down to his feet, his right leg.  This is hell, absolute hell. It's like a life sentence for a child. In America they do cut price amputations in the US for people with CRPS.  I'm speaking to one woman who had to have her arm removed as the pain was that bad.  He's begged me to have his leg removed. He told me he wanted to die. It's horrific to watch my cheeky boy end up like this. People need to know how bad it is. For a little boy who has this, he hasn't been to school in three months.'

The NHS offers patients who are suffering with the condition education and management, physical rehabilitation, pain relief and psychological support.  Ms Wilford, a student nurse, and her daughter Maddison, 24, have been helping to care for the in-pain schoolboy.  She said: 'We're raising 100k for him to send him to America, a clinic in Arkansas.  It includes light therapy, oxygen treatment, they do things that they don't in this country look at it his condition.  It's a 16-week treatment and it's every single day. They do over a 120-blood tests - they haven't even tested his blood test over here. In the UK they don't do anything like that.  There's no known cure for CRPS but they can get people into remission. Once you've got CRPS you've got it for life. Once you go to America, they get you walking again.  The people I've been speaking to in other countries don't seem to get it back after they've had the treatment in the US.  It was four weeks between physio appointments and that isn't on.  I want to raise awareness for it. There was no trigger for it. It was completely random, he woke up one morning and he was limping. That night he screamed all night horrifically. The next day I took him to A&E and they said there was nothing wrong with him.  My kids call me paper towel mum but the screams were horrific. It's only by luck that we saw a different doctor who asked me to tell the whole story and said I know what it was.  We asked for referrals to Manchester Children's Hospital but it was refused as they didn't do anything about it.  They thought he might lose his leg as there was no blood flow to his leg. He was put on morphine and he had a really bad reaction to it.  It is known as the suicide disease. It affects their mental that badly. He couldn't use his crutches anymore as he was in hospital bed bound a lot. I was worried he'd waste away to nothing.  He screams every night. The first sound I hear when I wake up is my son screaming. He screams all the time. He has to wear shorts.'

To donate to the fundraiser, please click here. 

How is Complex Regional Pain Syndrome caused?

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a condition that causes extreme discomfort that does not ease.  It usually affects just one arm or leg following an earlier injury, such as a fracture or sprain with no nerve damage, or nerve damage to a limb.  CRPS' exact prevalence is unclear, however, a study claimed up to one in 3,800 people in the UK develop the condition each year.

What are the symptoms?

Pain is the main symptom, which may be burning, stabbing, stinging or throbbing.  The affected limb is usually sensitive to touch, with even clothing causing agony.  CRPS also causes swelling that can lead to stiffness, limb weakness and jerky movements. Joints may also appear redder or warmer than usual.

What causes CRPS?

CRPS' cause is unclear but is thought to be due to the nerves in the affected area becoming more sensitive, which may change the pain pathways between the limb and the brain.

What are patients' treatment options?

There is no one treatment. Therapies aim to maintain movement through rehabilitation and pain relief.

Source: Versus Arthritis

43
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10833355/Serial-killer-obsessed-Indie-band-guitarist-Cody-Ackland-24-jailed-30-years.html

Chilling moment Ted Bundy-obsessed Indie guitarist, 24, calmly handed himself in three days after he bludgeoned Bobbi-Anne McLeod, 18, to death and acted out his secret 'fantasy' murder as he's jailed for a minimum of 31 years

    Judge Robert Lindford told Ackland that 'there is a strong possibility you may never be released from prison'
    Ackland had been driving around Plymouth looking for victim when he randomly chanced upon Bobbi-Anne
    After parking, he crept up on the teenager along path behind the bus stop before hitting her with a hammer
    Twisted Ackland said attack was meant to 'be it' but he kidnapped Bobbi-Anne after noticing she was still alive
    Drove her 19 miles to car park at Bellever Forest, on the fringes of Dartmoor, where he killed her with hammer
    Fiend then drove further 25 miles towards the coast of Plymouth Sound where he dumped her body in woods

By Rory Tingle, Home Affairs Correspondent and Nick Constable for MailOnline

Published: 13:30, 19 May 2022 | Updated: 15:02, 19 May 2022

This is the chilling moment Ted Bundy obsessed killer Cody Ackland calmly walked into a Plymouth police station three days after he bludgeoned 18-year-old Bobbi-Anne McLeod to death to enact his twisted 'fantasy' as he was jailed to life with a minimum of 31 years.   The Indie band guitarist, 24, was unknown to police when he murdered Bobbi-Anne with a claw hammer after kidnapping her as she waited for a bus in Plymouth on November 20 last year.  Ackland spent the next 48 hours after the savage murder socialising with friends, and even attended a pub lock-in. Friends said the only time they had seen the killer so happy was at one of his band's gigs.  Three days after killing he eventually turned himself in and confessed, with a video showing him walking into Charles Cross at 1.30pm with his arms behind his back. He was wearing a facemask and a high-vis jacket he used for his work as a garage car valet.  After confessing to Bobbi-Anne's murder, Ackland asked for a map and directed detectives to Bovisand where police found her body hours later. Bobbi-Anne's battered body was identified using dental records, while phone data corroborated the killer's story.  Today, Ackland looked at the judge throughout his sentencing remarks and nodded as his sentence was passed. As he left the dock, Bobbi-Anne's brother Lee shouted: 'You're a dead man, you dirty c***'.

Judge Robert Linford, sitting in Plymouth Crown Court, told Ackland: 'You subjected Bobbi-Anne McLeod to a prolonged, savage and merciless attack.  She was a young, popular and much-loved person, you caused outrage and fear in this part of the country and with good reason, it was utterly motiveless.'

Judge Lindford, who sentenced Ackland to 30 years and 190 days, told Ackland that he would remain indefinitely a 'highly dangerous person', adding: 'There is a strong possibility you may never be released from prison.'

Ackland had been 'acting out his dark fantasy' when he kidnapped and murdered the teenager on the evening of November 20 last year, the court heard today.  He drove around Plymouth looking for a victim when he randomly chanced upon Bobbi-Anne, who reminded him of one of his past girlfriends. After parking his car, he crept up on the teenager along a path behind the bus stop before striking her over the back of the head with a claw hammer.   The 4ft 11in college student fell to the ground and as 'their eyes met' he hit her over the head again, he later told police. Ackland said this initial attack was meant to 'be it', but as he walked back to his Ford Fiesta he saw Bobbi-Anne moving, so drove back and kidnapped the bleeding teenager by violently bundling her in the footwell.  Ackland then drove her around 19 miles to a car park at Bellever Forest, on the fringes of Dartmoor, where he repeatedly hit her with a hammer, causing 'multiple catastrophic injuries to her head and face' during a 'prolonged, frenzied, sadistic attack'. He recalled Bobbi-Anne say 'I'm scared' shortly before the savage assault.

Describing the moments after he battered the teenager in a police interview, Ackland said: 'It's not funny but she started to make a noise and I thought ''f****** hell, wow, I mean hats off to her''.'   

After finally stomping on her neck, Ackland put her body into the boot of his red car and drove more than 25 miles to Bovisand, on the eastern side of Plymouth Sound, where he stripped her of her clothes and some jewellery and dumped her body in undergrowth down a slope.  Prosecutor Richard Posner said: 'She had been dumped face down in the dirt and foliage. Her body was completely naked. Tragically, Bobbi was dead. The scene was closed off while her body was recovered. There were 14 lacerations to her head and face. Her body was identified through dental records.'   

After the attack in November 2021, callous Ackland threw away her clothes in an allotment before going out partying with friends.  Witnesses told how he was laughing, joking and hugging people and went to a pub-lock-in before later ordering pizza. He also attended a practice session with his rock band. Friends said the only time they had seen the killer so happy was at one of the band's gigs.  Meanwhile, Bobbi-Anne's worried family tried to find her after she failed to meet her boyfriend, Louie Leach, in Plymouth.  Three days later, Ackland a car valet turned himself in and confessed, telling detectives where he had dumped her body. At a previous hearing, Ackland, of Southway, Plymouth pleaded guilty to murder.  Richard Posner, prosecuting, told the court Ackland was leading 'a double life' and harboured a fascination with serial killers in the UK, Australia, US and Russia.  Mr Posner said Ackland had conducted extensive searches about 'their crimes, the aftermath of such crimes, and the bodies left behind in days leading up to Bobbi-Anne (McLeod's) death'.

He said he had also been searching the web pages of DIY stores for 'hammers, crowbars and cutting tools'.  'Cody Ackland led a double life. When he left home on November 20 and drove through Leigham in Plymouth towards the bus stop where Bobbi-Anne was,' the prosecutor said.

'He held such an unhealthy fascination and desire to imitate serial killers. His fascination was to become an unimaginable wicked reality for Bobbi-Anne.'

In disturbing police interviews, Ackland told how he had 'panicked' at seeing Bobbi-Anne was still alive after the initial attack at the bus stop.   'I did it again, I hit her again with the hammer and went to get back in the car and was going to drive away,' he said.

Ackland described his reasoning as 'an industrial way of thinking' adding 'I just thought, right, get rid of the problem.'

He said Bobbi-Anne was still able to walk when they arrived at Bellever Forest car park.  The killer said he had lifted Bobbi-Anne McLeod and supported her as they walked towards woodland.  He said she had said something like 'I am scared'.

Ackland told police: 'I said (to Bobbi-Anne) so am I, I never done this, I've never seen this', but I meant to say 'I've never done this'.

He described striking her 12 times to the head with a hammer to the head and face, but she was still breathing.  The twisted murderer said in interview: 'It's not funny but she started to make a noise and I thought 'f****** hell, wow, I mean hats off to her'.'

He added that he had also trodden on her neck to suffocate her.  At 5.45pm on November 20, Bobbi-Anne left her home in Leigham to meet her boyfriend and walked to the nearby bus stop on Bampton Road, where she was last seen alive at 6.15pm.  By 7.15pm, the teenager's family were starting to worry and a member of the public found her abandoned mobile phone and Apple AirPod case in the bus stop.  The teenager's boyfriend contacted her family at 9pm asking where she was, and they immediately went out looking for her and appealing on social media.  Devon and Cornwall Police launched a missing person inquiry.  On Tuesday at lunchtime, he left work to walk to a police station to confess to murdering Bobbi-Anne.  He asked for a map and directed detectives to Bovisand where police found her body hours later in woodland near a disused military fort.  Forensic evidence and phone data corroborated Ackland's story, the court heard.  Crime scene investigators located the clothes at the allotments and his blood-stained trainers were found in his wardrobe. Bobbi-Anne's blood was found in and around his car.  Rakuda, who released their first EP in August last year, announced in November they would disband 'with immediate effect', but weeks later said they would be taking a 'short hiatus from the music scene' with a view to reforming in the spring of 2022.   Ian Wilkinson, senior crown prosecutor for the Crown Prosecution Service in the south-west of England, said: 'Bobbi-Anne was just 18 years old when her life was taken away in the most cruel and shocking manner.  As this case reaches its end, our thoughts are very much with Bobbi-Anne's family as they continue to live with what Cody Ackland did.  The CPS were involved with the case from the start of the investigation following the discovery of Bobbi-Anne's body.  We worked closely alongside our partners in the police to build the strongest possible case to ensure that Ackland was held responsible for what he did.  Violence against women and girls has a devastating effect on victims and their families.  The CPS is dedicated to working with our partners in the criminal justice system to bring offenders to justice and make the public safer.'

Senior investigating officer Detective Inspector Stephanie Blundell, of Devon and Cornwall Police, said of Ackland's sentence: 'I welcome today's sentence, however today does not bring cause for celebration.  This was a shocking and brutal crime which led to a young life being tragically cut short and changed the lives of Bobbi's family forever. The details of the case heard today were harrowing, particularly for Bobbi's family.  I would like to thank the investigators who worked on this case, including the detectives, uniformed officers, forensic investigators and all of the support teams who conducted themselves professionally and sensitively in a case of such distressing nature.  I would like to commend Bobbi-Anne's family Donna, Adrian and Lee for the strength, courage and resilience they have demonstrated throughout the investigation process and in particular, today's hearing.  'The senseless and evil acts of one man have devastated their lives and I hope that today's outcome brings them a sense of justice.  'The impact of this case has been felt far and wide across the communities of Plymouth, particularly in Leigham.  It has been heartening to see the community come together in support of Bobbi's family. I hope the community can now focus on healing and recovery, knowing that Ackland will be in prison for a substantial length of time.'
 
Indie band guitarist who idolised US monster Ted Bundy: Bobbi-Anne McLeod killer Cody Ackland was obsessed with serial killers and researched human mutilation online before he bludgeoned petite 24-year-old to death and dumped her body in woodland

By Nick Constable for MailOnline

The Indie band guitarist who snatched teenager Bobbi-Anne McLeod from a bus stop before murdering her and dumping her body on a beach was obsessed with serial killers, researched human mutilation online and idolised US monster Ted Bundy, MailOnline can reveal.  Detectives found almost 3,000 graphic, grisly images of dead and dismembered people on Cody Ackland's phone a horrific window into his grotesque double life.  Ackland, 24, was morbidly fascinated by Bundy, who was executed in 1989 after kidnapping, raping and murdering at least 30 women and girls during the 1970s.  Investigators found from August to November last year, Ackland had looked for information about several murderers, including Ted Bundy, Golden State Killer Joseph DeAngelo Jr, Andrei Chikatilo, Ivan Milat, Fred West and Tommy Sells.  In the week before killing Bobbi-Anne McLeod, Ackland carried out further searches for Ted Bundy, Fred West and 'Fred West's house'.  Two days the murder, he also looked up Richard Chase, the Vampire of Sacramento, and 'Richard Chase bodies'. The day before handing himself into police, Ackland also searched for serial killer Ed Kemper.  Richard Posner, prosecuting, said: 'His interest in the macabre presents as deep-rooted; a fascination with death, murder and murderers and the means to commit murder.'

Despite this, Ackland successfully managed to hide his dark obsession from all who knew him. Speaking at Devon and Cornwall Police headquarters in Exeter, Detective Superintendent Mike West said investigators had been through Ackland's past 'with a fine toothcomb' and found nothing to link him to previous crimes.  Ray Tully QC, defending Ackland, told Plymouth Crown Court his client's obsession with images of murder victims had to be viewed through the 'prism' of his troubled childhood and mental health struggles.  'Psychiatrists characterise it as a kind of self-harm, someone who has developed an addiction to seeking out material, going back to it again and again,' he said.

'(Ackland) describes it as self-medicating, if he can shock himself he might shock himself out of what he felt he had become capable of doing.  He felt the storm clouds gathering and felt incapable of addressing them.'

He said Ackland had been diagnosed with special educational needs by aged seven, and at the age of nine was already contemplating suicide.  Ackland was diagnosed with ADHD, dyslexia, depression and anxiety and by the age of 19 'had a seven-year depressive history', Mr Tully said.  Mr Tully said Ackland had not received 'much comfort' from either his home or his school life and that the his father and other male role models had not provided much 'in the way of succour or support'.  He said Ackland viewed Bobbi-Anne's murder as 'the culmination of everything that has gone on his life, stemming from childhood'.  Mr Tully added: '(Psychiatrists) describe him as leading a sad and isolated life from a young age, someone who is self absorbed but not in a narcissistic way, it is not self-loving we are dealing with here, it is self-loathing.  He grew up to hate himself, angry with the world, angry with everything, and he did at time seek assistance and help about that, but it wasn't particularly forthcoming.'

Ackland was so unmoved by his brutal claw-hammer attack on 18-year-old Bobbi-Anne that in the hours immediately after stripping and dumping her body he was out partying with friends.  Witnesses told how he was laughing, joking and hugging people and went to a pub-lock-in before later ordering pizza. He also attended a practice session with his rock band.  Friends said the only time they had seen the killer so happy was at one of the band's gigs.  After Ackland was sentenced today, Bobbi-Anne's mother Donna, father Adrian and brother Lee released a joint family statement in which they described her as 'the best daughter, the best sister, the best friend to so many people.'  'Everybody who knew Bobbi loved her,' they added.

'We have been robbed of our beautiful girl in the worst possible way and our lives will never be the same without her.'

They went on: 'Our lives have changed forever. We have not been able to say goodbye to Bobbi-Anne and we can only imagine the things he did to her - the thoughts are continually going around in our minds.  Why Bobbi-Anne? Why make her suffer? To know her final hours were spent being tortured destroys us inside.  Bobbi-Anne was so loved and had so many life plans. He cruelly ripped that life away from her and us.  We can't even contemplate a future without her in it. There will never be anything the justice system can impose that will ever come close to what he deserves.'

Ackland didn't know Bobbi-Anne and randomly chose her as his victim as she stood at a bus-stop near her family's home in Leigham, Plymouth, at 6.05pm on Saturday November 20th last year, heading for a night-out with her boyfriend.  He attacked her and walked backed to his car nearby, later telling police: 'That was meant to be it.'

But when he saw her move he returned, bundled her into the footwell of his red Ford Fiesta and drove 19 miles to Bellever Forest on Dartmoor where he repeatedly battered her around the head with the hammer, causing 'catastrophic' injuries.  Her naked body was later found in woods near a disused military fort at Bovisand, Plymouth. Her clothes were found tossed into an allotment.  Outside court Det Supt Mike West, head of major crime for Devon and Cornwall Police, said analysis of Ackland's phone revealed how he scrupulously planned the murder, modelling it on Bundy's sickening techniques.  'Ackland was leading a double life and had a secret a morbid interest in a significant number of serial killers from around the world, particularly US killer Ted Bundy whose kidnap and murder of young women bore similarities to Ackland's crime.  There were pictures of Bundy and the weapons he used on the phone.  In the days and weeks leading up to Bobbi-Anne's death, Ackland searched the internet for information about serial killers' crimes, their aftermath and the bodies left behind.  He kept a huge supply of grisly images on his phone, depicting dismembered or dead bodies, post mortem examinations and murder scenes.  Over the days and hours before the murder Ackland browsed for remote locations on Dartmoor and for potential weapons such as helmets, hammers, crowbars and cutting tools.  Ackland also searched sportswear websites for items such as ski masks, waterproof clothing and balaclavas, actively trying to replicate the actions of the serial killers he was so fascinated by.'

By 7.15pm on the evening she went missing, Bobbi-Anne's family were already starting to worry that they hadn't heard from her.  When her boyfriend called at 9pm saying she hadn't arrived, they began to search and make appeals on social media.  By 10pm Police had launched a missing persons enquiry and made a public appeal for anyone who had seen her to come forward.  Three days later Ackland left his job as a garage car valet, sent 'strange' messages to friends and family saying he had 'done something' and walked into a Plymouth police station to confess.  He told detectives: 'I did it. I was responsible for it'.

He then revealed where he had left the teenager's body, claimed he wanted to help police and Bobbi-Anne's family and said he had a 'tendency to overthink things.'

He said he'd gone out on the night of the murder because he was 'feeling low' and 'wound up' and needed to get out of the house.  Moments later he attacked Bobbi-Anne at the bus stop with frenzied blows from his hammer.  Det Supt West went on: 'He intended to go out socialising for the night and cut through Leigham to save time.  It was then that he spotted Bobbi-Anne, who he didn't know but who resembled girls he'd dated in the past.  Ackland will claim that he wasn't looking for somebody anybody in particular it was just a coincidence. He described his actions as 'an industrial way of thinking' to get rid of a problem.  He thought about taking her to hospital but instead, to use his expression, decided to dispose of her body so he drove 19 miles to Bellever Forest, arriving at 7.45pm.  It was here he attacked her repeatedly with the hammer, outside the car, before burning her handbag nearby along with other items from the vehicle.'

Ackland told police he 'went into problem-solving mode', headed for the wooded lane at Bovisand, dumped Bobbi-Anne's body in undergrowth, drove to his Plymouth family home and went to bed.  The following morning he claimed he asked himself 'what had actually happened' before going for pizza with a friend.  He was, according to the friend, 'chatty and having a laugh and 'hugging people', said Det Supt. West.  'Friends recalled him being happier than usual and said the only time they had seen him so happy was before one of his gigs.  He told detectives that the killing was not on his mind because it was 'so out there' and extreme that it was almost like a film or fantasy, something that hadn't really happened.  He told police he did not know how he felt about the murder, that it felt like someone else had committed the crime but he knew deep down it was him.  He blamed childhood issues and a failure to be given help when he was younger. In fact, Ackland blamed everybody apart from himself.  Bobbi did not stand a chance on being attacked by a man using a claw hammer, who was intent on delivering a callous and sustained assault in Leigham, and then in a secluded forest on Dartmoor.  Ackland's sentencing will deliver a degree of justice to Bobbi-Anne's family. But we know only too well that their loss will be suffered for a long time.'

Det Supt West said that, even if Ackland had not handed himself in, he would have been tracked through mobile phone signals placing him near to Bobbi-Anne, CCTV footage and 'covert' techniques which he declined to specify.  'I am certain he would have been located and caught and we would have identified where Bobbi-Anne's body had been deposited,' he said.

However Ackland had no file on the Police National Computer and had not engaged with police either as a victim or a suspect prior to the murder.  He appeared to have led a 'secret life operated clandestinely' and his offending had 'come as a really significant shock' to those who knew him best.  The attack had happened without warning 'no one could have recognised the level of risk that Ackland presented.'

Forensic teams found no evidence of a sexual motivation and Ackland claimed the reason he stripped Bobbi-Anne was to try and prevent her being identified if she was found at some stage in the future.  'He wanted to make it clear that there was no sexual motivation,' said Det Supt West.

'He was calm, he was measured and there was no requirement for any mental health support.  I have yet to see any remorse on Ackland's part despite numerous opportunities for him to convey that.'

He added that while there was no indication that Ackland had ever been involved in any form of offending, women or girls who believed they might have been targeted by him should contact the police.  Attacks on lone girls were 'exceptionally rare' and there had been 'no trigger' to suggest Ackland was likely to launch one.

Check following prosecutor quotes at Plymouth Crown court hearing tomorrow quotes from Crown prosecutor Richard Posner

Prosecutor Richard Posner told Plymouth Crown Court that Ackland's interest in death was 'sinister and relevant to his motivation.'

Mr Posner added: 'His interest in the macabre presents as deep-rooted; a fascination with death, murder and murderers and the means to commit murder.  He had viewed and kept extreme and graphic images of dead and dismembered people, bodies of purported murder victims, post-mortem, deposition sites and artefacts linked to murders such as weapons and soiled and tainted items.  Ackland possessed images linked to serial killers and historic missing persons appeals by US police.'

He went on: 'There are numerous images of the American serial killer Ted Buddy in his telephone and images of weapons he used to kill his victims.  Bundy approached his victims in public places and knocked them unconscious before killing them.  It is not a coincidence that Bobbi-Anne McLeod met her fate the same way.'

In their statement Bobbi-Anne's family thanked both police and the public for their help in trying to find her and, later, to bring Ackland to justice.  'The help and support from everyone, not just friends and family but everyone, everywhere, who helped with all of the posters, posts and messages to bring our baby, our Bobbi, home thank you.  To everyone in the police, the investigation team and all of the services, we thank you for everything you have done and for finally getting justice for Bobbi-Anne.'

Ted Bundy: 'Shy and attractive' psychology student who could be responsible for as many as 100 murders across multiple US states

The name Ted Bundy is synonymous with serial killer after the shy and attractive psychology major embarked on a killing spree in the 1970s that left more than two dozen women dead. There is speculation he could be responsible for up to 100 murders.  In 1974, witnesses saw a young man, who introduced himself as Ted, approach two young women at Seattle State Park and ask for help with his sailboat. They were never seen alive again and became his first known victims.  It was in the same year that several young women disappeared from college campuses in Washington and Oregon - including a 21-year-old radio announcer called Lynda Ann Healy.  Later that year, Bundy relocated to Utah to attend law school in Salt Lake City. In November, Carol DaRonch was attacked by a man she described dressed as a police officer but escaped.  She gave the first clear description and a blood sample from her jacket. Miss DaRonch also told police that he was driving a tan VW Beetle. As Miss DaRonch was giving her statement, 17-year-old Debbie Kent disappeared.  A short time later, hikers found the bones of missing women in a Washington forest. A rough sketch was drawn a tall, thin attractive man who approached young, white women looking for help and called himself 'Ted'.  Police also noted common factors among the victims they were all thin and had long hair parted in the middle. All the women were targeted in the evening and bludgeoned with blunt objects. The victims had also been raped.   At the beginning of January 1975, Caryn Campbell vanished from a Colorado ski resort. Her naked body was found a month later in a ditch by the side of the road. Five more women were founded murdered in a similar manner in the following months.  In August, police pulled Bundy over for a driving offence. When Miss DaRonch picked him out of a line-up, he was charged with attempted kidnapping.  He was sentenced in 1976 to 15 years in prison and later police connected him to the murder of Caryn Campbell.  On December 30, Bundy escaped from prison and turned up in Tallahassee, Florida renting an apartment near Florida State University under a false name.  On January 14, 1978, Bundy struck again. He broken into the Chi Omega sorority house and bludgeoned and strangled to death two women, raping one of them and viciously biting her body.  He almost murdered two others by beating them over the head with a log before a roommate interrupted his spree.  Almost a month later on February 9, Kimberly Leach, who was 12, was kidnapped and mutilated by Bundy. The serial killer was picked up a week later while driving a stolen car before witnesses placed him at both the sorority house and outside Kimberly's school.  Charged with three murders killing the two sorority women and another Kimberly LaFouche Bundy believed he could beat a guilty verdict and turned down a plea bargain of three life sentences. He went on trial in Florida on June 25, 1979, found guilty and sentenced to death.  Prior to his execution, Bundy gave the details of the murder sites of more than 50 women. He also said that he kept the heads of some women at his home to engage in necrophilia.  Bundy was electrocuted on January 24, 1989 at 7.13am.

Defence lawyer: Ackland 'grew up to hate himself' and was 'angry with everything' during troubled childhood 

Ray Tully QC, defending Ackland, told Plymouth Crown Court his client's obsession with images of murder victims had to be viewed through the 'prism' of his mental health struggles.  'Psychiatrists characterise it as a kind of self-harm, someone who has developed an addiction to seeking out material, going back to it again and again.'

'(Ackland) describes it as self-medicating, if he can shock himself he might shock himself out of what he felt he had become capable of doing.  He felt the storm clouds gathering and felt incapable of addressing them.'

He said Ackland had been diagnosed with special educational needs by aged seven, and at the age of nine was already contemplating suicide.  Ackland was diagnosed with ADHD, dyslexia, depression and anxiety and by the age of 19 'had a seven-year depressive history', Mr Tully said.

Mr Tully said Ackland had not received 'much comfort' from either his home or his school life and that the his father and other male role models had not provided much 'in the way of succour or support.  He said Ackland viewed Bobbi-Anne's murder as 'the culmination of everything that has gone on his life, stemming from childhood'.

Mr Tully added: '(Psychiatrists) describe him as leading a sad and isolated life from a young age, someone who is self absorbed but not in a narcissistic way, it is not self-loving we are dealing with here, it is self-loathing.  He grew up to hate himself, angry with the world, angry with everything, and he did at time seek assistance and help about that, but it wasn't particularly forthcoming.'

'Why Bobbi-Anne? Why make her suffer': Family question brutal killer 

In a statement released by Devon and Cornwall Police after the sentencing, the family of Bobbi-Anne McLeod said: 'Bobbi was a beautiful girl who lit up our lives and the lives of everyone she ever met. She was kind, funny, and loyal. She was the best daughter, the best sister, and the best friend to so many people. Everybody who knew Bobbi loved her.  We have been robbed of our beautiful girl in the worst possible way and our lives will never be the same without her. I want Cody Ackland to know that he has taken away our world. We will never see her beautiful face or hear her laugh, see her get married or have the children she so wanted. So many everyday things have been taken away. Her not being here is still unimaginable.  Our lives have changed forever. We have not been able to say goodbye to Bobbi-Anne and we can only imagine the things he did to her the thoughts are continually going around in our minds. Why Bobbi-Anne? Why make her suffer? To know her final hours were spent being tortured destroys us inside.  Bobbi-Anne was so loved and had so many life plans; he cruelly ripped that life away from her and us. We can't even contemplate a future without her in it. There will never be anything the justice system can impose that will ever come close to what he deserves.  We do want to say thank you to everyone. There is no piece of paper, bulletin board, flyer, or anything big enough out there on which we can say thank you. The help and support from everyone, not just friends and family but everyone, everywhere, who helped with all of the posters, posts and messages to bring our baby, our Bobbi, home thank you.  To everyone in the police, the investigation team and all of the services, we thank you for everything you have done and for finally getting justice for Bobbi-Anne.' 

44
Fun, Games And Silliness / The test
« on: May 04, 2022, 10:03:57 PM »
I was out walking with my then 4-year-old daughter. She picked up something off the ground and started to put it in her mouth. I asked her not to do that.  "Why?"

"Because it's been laying outside and is dirty and probably has germs."

At this point, she looked at me with total admiration and asked, "Wow! How do you know all this stuff?"

"Uh," I was thinking quickly, everyone knows this stuff, "Um, it's on the Mommy test. You have to know it, or they don't let you be a Mommy."

"Oh."

We walked along in silence for 2 or 3 minutes, but she was evidently pondering this new information.  "I get it!" she beamed. "Then if you flunk, you have to be the Daddy."

45
Fun, Games And Silliness / Keeping up with traffic
« on: May 04, 2022, 10:01:10 PM »
Cop: You know how fast you were going?

Guy: Sorry officer, I was just trying to catch up with traffic.

Cop: What traffic? The road is empty.

Guy: Yeah, that's how far behind I am.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8