Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - heartbroken

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]
106
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-49151703?intlink_from_url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/topics/c34p8k91pw2t/terminal-illness&link_location=live-reporting-story

Cardiff and Swansea hospices inspire The Colours play about death
By Huw Thomas BBC Wales arts and media correspondent
30 July 2019

People using Welsh hospices have inspired a new play about the way we deal with death.  The Colours uses interviews with people attending Ty Olwen in Swansea and Velindre Cancer Centre in Cardiff as its script.  Recorded words are streamed into the headphones of actors, who deliver them during the drama, which opens on Tuesday at the Soho Theatre in London.  The play's creator wants to "lift the stigma" around terminal illness.  Harriet Madeley, who has written the play, carried out interviews with patients at the hospices.  She joined ward rounds and spoke to medical staff as well as people receiving palliative care.  Ms Madeley said: "I wanted to dispel some of the fear we feel around life-limiting illnesses. Not to normalise it, but to access some of the people who are going through it.  As soon as you go and speak to people you understand it, you humanise it. And the theatre is the medium for me to do that."

The play is about five people on a Welsh beach who use memory, fantasy and reality as they approach the end of their lives.  The actors wear headphones and listen to recorded interviews with hospice patients, repeating their words during the dramatised events on stage.  Ms Madeley, who hopes to bring the show to Wales next year, said the resilience of the patients she met had inspired the work.  "A lot of this is about human spirit and character. I find that you tend to get more surprising, richer, funnier and more meaningful characters if you go with real people," she said.

"It is so important that we lift the stigma. We are all getting older, we are all getting more long-term conditions.  Fifty years ago people were much more often dying at home, surrounded by family members, and dying quicker from infectious diseases."

'Finite and precious'

Two of the characters whose stories appear in the play are Joe and his wife Jill from Swansea. Joe has terminal cancer and attends the day centre at the Ty Olwen hospice every week.  He said it was a "strange experience" to be interviewed in order to be portrayed on stage, but said he hoped it would help others to understand what it's like to live with a terminal illness.

    'Departure lounge' tackles taboos
    Call for 'national conversation' over death
    Bowie 'helped lift lid on death'

Joe said another patient, who had not told anyone about his cancer, asked him why he was being so open about the condition.  "And I said, well, you are telling people, showing people, not just how we feel but if they come around the corner and they get it some day how they will feel too.  You have got to be positive, you know. I didn't in the beginning, I've got to be honest. I didn't feel positive whatsoever. But now, going up to Ty Olwen and talking to other people that helped me a lot."

Ms Madeley said she wanted audiences to be inspired by the patients' words.  "I hope people will leave the play with a stronger awareness of their own mortality, and not in a way that frightens them.  The play does acknowledge that life is finite and precious, and I think it would be difficult to have a meaningful life if it didn't end," she added.

Dr Idris Baker, consultant in palliative medicine at Ty Olwen, worked with the producer to capture the voices of patients at the hospice.  He said the play allowed patients' voices to be heard.  "For people living with an illness it is sometimes harder for their voices to be heard. "And a lot of the people we see here are living with a life-shortening illness and they are not going to survive as long as they might have expected, and it is so easy for their voices to be lost and not to be heard.  A hundred years ago, all of us would have had experience of people in the family dying, and of people living with life-shortening illnesses.  It's a good thing that fewer people die young than used to, but it does mean most of us don't have quite so much experience of that - experience of people close to us having a serious illness, a life-shortening illness, or coming to the end of their lives."

Dr Baker said many patients were keen to share their experiences.  "Keen for themselves, so that they can leave something of what they were thinking. But also keen to help other people in the future," he added.

107
General Discussion / Psychiatry’s Ancient Origins
« on: November 06, 2019, 07:11:04 PM »
https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/cultural-psychiatry/psychiatrys-ancient-origins?rememberme=1&elq_mid=4523&elq_cid=1671665&GUID=7A434E9D-C737-4234-9614-E04C33A5717C

Psychiatry’s Ancient Origins
By Kenneth J. Weiss, MD and Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry
November 29, 2018

When did psychiatry begin?

Was it with the discovery of the unconscious?

Or was it the discovery of neurotransmitters?

As it turns out, healers have been treating mental disorders for thousands of years. Modern psychiatry reflects some, but not all, the values and concepts held by early civilizations. Ancient Greek, Indian, Chinese, Egyptian, Hebrew, European, Arabic, and other cultures explored dimensions of mental and physical health and disease. In the Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry’s (GAP) 2018 most recent installment in our series of videos on the history of psychiatry, the Committee on Arts & Humanities explores how mental illness was understood from post-stone-age cultures through the Middle Ages.

Early civilizations relied on shamans, sorcerers, magicians, mystics, priests, and other approved healers to treat illnesses. Using rituals, incantations, and offerings, sickness could be prevented or healed. Somatic therapies, not unlike neurosurgery, can be inferred from archeological findings from France (6500 BCE) and China (5000 BCE). For example, skeletal remains of children with marked skull abnormalities and traumas suggest the ways in which humans cared for mentally impaired children 77,000 years ago.1

Some ancient peoples believed diseases occurred due to loss of the soul. Shamans entered into trances or altered states of consciousness, enabling their souls to journey into spirit worlds, sometimes into the underworld.2 During the journey, shamans connected to souls of the dead and to living souls that had strayed or been stolen. Interacting with demons and lost souls without losing their own souls, they brought about cures. The shaman acted as both priest and healer.

In Classical Greece (fifth century BCE), philosophers taught “naturalism,” the belief that laws of nature shape our world, as opposed to gods and demons determining human fate. Alcmaeon, for example, believed the brain, not the heart, was the “organ of thought.”3 He tracked the ascending sensory nerves from the body to the brain, theorizing that mental activity originated in the CNS and that the cause of mental illness resided within the brain. He applied this understanding to classify mental diseases and treatments.

Hippocrates developed a theory of chemical imbalance based on four humors: black bile, yellow bile, phlegm, and blood. Disease resulted from disproportions among the humors. His thinking influenced the practice of medicine for 2000 years.4 Today the term melancholia (too much black bile) is still in use. Hippocrates may have been “wrong” by current scientific thought, but theories of “chemical imbalance” remain.

In India, the ancient textbook on Yoga Sutra describes dynamics leading to health and illness.5 In later centuries, the external causes of mental illness were attributed to patients’ sins committed during current or previous lives. For example, disregarding important deceased persons, superhuman agents, ghosts, deities, and celestial beings could bring about various symptoms, depending on which spirits were offended.

Chinese texts from 3000 year ago mention neuropsychiatric illness, including descriptions of mania and psychosis with or without epilepsy. “Imbalance” was the mechanism of psychosis. Other conditions described include confusion, visual illusions, intoxication, stress, and even malingering. Psychological theories about stages of human development can be traced to the time of Confucius, about 2500 years ago.6

During Europe’s Middle Ages, the focus of theories about mental illness shifted back from physiology to spirituality. As Christianity spread, ideas about sin dominated, and the “psychotherapists” of the era were priests rather than physicians. The notion of demons in the Old Testament continued into the writings of the New Testament. Demonic possession remained a basic assumption. Christian physicians embraced some of the old beliefs of the Greeks and Romans, however, the natural therapy of the Greeks was lost as treatment turned to astrology, alchemy, theology, magic rites, and exorcism.

Preoccupation with witches raged throughout the seventeenth century. Tens of thousands of suspected witches, mostly women, were killed. Those accused of witchcraft included individuals who exhibited aberrant behaviors that today would be considered examples of mental illness, while some had no symptoms.7

The interplay between supernatural and natural thinking can be seen across ancient cultures. Mental health practices continued to progress and regress throughout the centuries, eventually including the idea of dedicated institutions for the care of the mentally ill. Tensions among culture, religion, and science will continue to shape concepts about the treatment of individuals with mental illnesses. Studying psychiatry’s origins and evolution gives us perspective on our own beliefs and practices.

To view the video on the Ancient Origins of Psychiatry, go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u072SnfVMXU

108
Articles / Essex lorry deaths: 39 bodies found in shipping container
« on: October 23, 2019, 07:50:45 PM »
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-50150070

Essex lorry deaths: 39 bodies found in shipping container

The bodies of 39 people have been found in a lorry container in Essex.

The vehicle was found shortly before 01:40 BST at Waterglade Industrial Park in Grays, police said.  Essex Police said the trailer has been moved to a secure location where the bodies of those inside a teenager and 38 adults can be recovered.  The driver, named locally as Mo Robinson, 25, from Portadown, County Armagh, Northern Ireland, has been arrested on suspicion of murder.  Essex Police said the trailer arrived via ferry from Zeebrugge, Belgium, into Purfleet on the River Thames.  "The ship docked in the Thurrock area shortly after 00:30", the force said.

It is believed the container and lorry then left the port together about 35 minutes later.  Deputy Chief Constable Pippa Mills said identifying the victims remained a "number one priority", but was expected to be a "lengthy process".  The National Crime Agency said it had sent officers to assist and identify any "organised crime groups who may have played a part".

Richard Burnett, chief executive of the Road Haulage Association, said the container appeared to be a refrigerated unit, where temperatures could be as low as -25C.  He described conditions for anyone inside as "absolutely horrendous".  A spokesman for the Bulgarian foreign affairs ministry confirmed the truck was registered in the country.  "The Scania truck was registered in Varna (on the east coast) under the name of a company owned by an Irish citizen," he said.

"Police said that it is highly unlikely that they are Bulgarians," he added.

Police have appealed for witnesses and anyone with information about the lorry's route to contact them.  The force said it believed the tractor unit or front part of the lorry had come from Northern Ireland.  Prime Minister Boris Johnson said it was an "unimaginable tragedy and truly heartbreaking".

Speaking at Prime Minister's Questions, he said: "I know that the thoughts and prayers of all members will be with those who lost their lives and their loved ones.  I'm receiving regular updates. The Home Office will work closely with Essex Police as we establish exactly what has happened."

'Contempt for life'

Home Secretary Priti Patel said she was "shocked and saddened", while Thurrock MP Jackie Doyle-Price said it was "sickening news".  During PMQs, Ms Doyle-Price said: "To put 39 people into a locked metal container shows a contempt for human life that is evil. The best thing we can do in memory of those victims is to find the perpetrators and bring them to justice."

Mr Johnson responded saying "all such traders in human beings should be hunted down and brought to justice".

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said it was an "unbelievable human tragedy", adding: "Can we just think for a moment of what it must have been like for those 39 people, obviously in a desperate and dangerous situation, for their lives to end, suffocated to death in a container?"

Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar told the Dail that investigations would be undertaken to establish if the lorry had passed through Ireland.

Tricky task of catching the people smugglers

Since the Calais migrant camps were shut three years ago and security measures were increased at Dover and the Channel Tunnel, people smugglers have increasingly moved to other routes.  Asked which ports are being used, the National Crime Agency told me: "All of them."

More dangerous methods are being used to get human cargo through.  The most common one is being hidden in the back of a lorry, but increasingly commercial shipping containers are being used, sometimes even refrigerated ones of the type seen on the back of the truck in Essex.  Risks are substantial for the migrants, who can pay £10,000 or more for a space on these vehicles.

How many migrants have died in transit?

The number of migrants who die in transit has been recorded by the UN since 2014.  Since then, five bodies of suspected migrants have been found in lorries or containers in the UK:

    2014: An Afghan migrant was found dead at Tilbury Docks, Essex. He was in a shipping container, with 34 Afghans who survived
    2015: Two migrants were found dead in a wooden crate in a warehouse in Branston, Staffordshire. The crate had been sent from Italy
    2016: An 18-year-old migrant was crushed while clinging to the underside of a lorry in Banbury, Oxfordshire
    2016: A body was found in the back of a lorry in Kent, which had travelled from France

Data was not collected in the same way before the migrant crisis began in 2014, but such deaths are not new.  In 2000, 58 Chinese migrants were found suffocated to death in a lorry at Dover.  In 2015, the bodies of 71 people were found in an abandoned lorry on an Austrian motorway. Police suspected the vehicle was part of a Bulgarian-Hungarian human trafficking operation.

Essex Police has set up a casualty bureau for anyone concerned about relatives to call.  The British Red Cross has confirmed staff and volunteers were helping "those dealing with this terrible tragedy".

109
Faith / Let's Stop Saying "Yeah, But ..." To God's Grace
« on: October 04, 2019, 06:12:16 PM »
https://www.sermoncentral.com/pastors-preaching-articles/sermoncentral-let-s-stop-saying-yeah-but-to-god-s-grace-2359?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=scbpu20190910&maropost_id=742347701&mpweb=256-8238183-742347701

Let's Stop Saying "Yeah, But ..." To God's Grace
By Sermoncentral on Sep 10, 2019

Sometimes grace needs to take an uninterrupted victory lap through our lives.  Sin is real.  But grace is stronger.  Hell exists.  But grace is greater.  Justice demands retribution.  But grace is God’s scandalous response.  Why are some Christians so quick to diminish simple statements of grace with a ‘yeah, but’ response?

Whenever a blogger writes something like “When Christians act like Jesus, sinners are drawn in, not pushed away”, there will always be a commenter who will quickly remind the writer, “Yeah, but they hated Jesus enough to crucify him.”

If someone posts a meme that states “grace means there is nothing I could do that would cause Jesus to love me less” they will inevitably receive several responses of “Yeah, that’s true, but love compels us to remind people they are sinners, too.”

Yeah, God’s grace is great. But.  We have to stop adding a ‘yeah, but’ to such basic statements of God’s love and grace. When we do that, we stifle the kind of audacious outbreak of grace that people experienced from Jesus and the early church. And that we need so desperately now.

Overcoming the ‘Yeah, But’ of Grace

‘But’ is a strong word.  Most of us were taught that when someone follows a compliment or apology with ‘but’, ignore everything that came before the ‘but’, because whatever follows the ‘but’ is what they really mean.  That is also true when we talk about sin and grace.  When we add a ‘yeah, but’ to statements about God’s grace and love, we make sin sound stronger than grace.  When we tell people God loves them, ‘but’ they’re sinners, what they hear is ‘God will only love me if I get my act together.’

Yes, we are sinners. That reality should never be ignored or underplayed. But qualifying every statement about love and grace with a ‘yeah, but’ about sin is like interrupting a team’s victory parade to remind everyone that they lost some games during the season, too.  Sometimes grace needs to take an uninterrupted victory lap through our lives.

Grace Comes After ‘But’, Not Before It

I’m not naïve. I’m fully aware of the large and growing movement to normalize and excuse sin in our culture. But I refuse to let that stop me from living and speaking about grace in audacious, Christ-like ways.  Besides, every culture has tried to normalize sins. Different sins at different times. That was certainly the case in both the Jewish and Roman cultures of Jesus’ day.  That’s why Jesus preached a ‘yeah, but’ message too. But his message wasn’t ‘Yeah, there’s grace, but don’t forget sin.’ Jesus message was ‘Yeah, there’s sin, but grace is greater.’

In Jesus’ life and message, grace was always the final word. Often scandalously so.

Love Without ‘Buts’

No one ever preached against sin more strongly than Jesus. But sin is not where the gospel message starts or ends.  It starts with being made in God’s image, it ends with resurrection.  It starts with love, it ends with grace.  Sin is not the start or the end of the sentence. It’s the aberration in the middle.  Sin is always an incomplete statement. Grace is the period at the end of the sentence.  Sin is always an incomplete statement. Grace is the period at the end of the sentence. Love is the message of the sentence.  Sin and hell are true. But they are partial truths. Grace completes the truth.  Sin and hell need a ‘yeah, but.’ Grace does not. Because grace follows the ‘yeah, but.’  The next time you hear a statement about the overwhelming power of God’s grace, let me encourage you to resist your urge to diminish it with qualifiers.  Sit on your ‘but’ and let grace stand alone.

110
Faith / Preaching To Believers And Seekers
« on: September 17, 2019, 06:45:46 PM »
https://www.sermoncentral.com/pastors-preaching-articles/josh-reich-preaching-to-believers-and-seekers-2322?ref=PreachingArticleDetails?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=scbpu20190812&maropost_id=742347701&mpweb=256-8170778-742347701

Preaching To Believers And Seekers
By Josh Reich on Aug 12, 2019
JoshuaReich.org

I got asked last week and I’ve been asked this by leaders from time to time, but the question goes like this, “How do you preach to believers and seekers?”

This question begins with what I believe is false thinking, that believers and seekers have different needs.  I want to be clear, believers and seekers are in different places on their spiritual journey. A person who walks into a church who has been walking with Jesus for 30 years compared to someone who has walked in for the first time, are in different places. They ask different questions. They’ll even tell you they have different needs. But in reality, they are looking and asking the same thing, just in different ways.  Those who do not yet follow Jesus are asking, “How can I save my marriage? Communicate with my teenager? Get my finances in order? Find happiness in life?”

They may even be asking deeper philosophical questions like, “Why did God allow that to happen in my life? Is God real or is this just a cosmic accident?”

Those who are followers of Jesus are asking, “How do I grow in my relationship with Jesus? How do I pray? Read my Bible?”

They are also asking, “How can I save my marriage? Communicate with my teenager? Get my finances in order? Find happiness in life?”

They may even be asking deeper philosophical questions like, “Why did God allow that to happen in my life? Is God real or is this just a cosmic accident?”

Each person who walks into a church on the weekend or a missional community during the week wants to know if John 10:10b is true. Does Jesus promise life? What is this life? How do I get it?

Now to be clear, no one has ever walked up to me and asked this question, but underneath the questions people ask, the prayer requests people list, the hurt in their eyes as we pray over them at Revolution, they want to know this. Is there life? How do I get it?

In the end, believers and seekers are asking the same thing, they are asking a gospel question.  This is one of the reasons I love preaching through books of the Bible. Every single week I will have multiple conversations that start like this, “how did you know that was exactly what I needed to hear” or “how did you know I was wrestling with that this week?”

The funny thing about that is we plan our sermons 12 months in advance.  Now, when you preach to each of these groups, you will have to do some things differently. Believers will give you the benefit of the doubt. Often if you say something is in the Bible, they’ll believe. Seekers are more skeptical. They want to know why they should trust you, believe you. They often think you have something up your sleeve, like you are selling them a bill of goods.  This is another advantage to preaching through books of the Bible. You simply preach the next line in the book, the next verse, the next topic. They are able to open the Bible and see where you are, that you aren’t making it up.

Scriptures: John 10:1-15Job 10:1-15

111
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7438127/Widow-British-man-choked-death-hotel-Thailand-says-son-asks-father.html

EXCLUSIVE: Widow of British man, 34, who was choked to death at a hotel in Thailand says their 20-month-old son asks after his father - and she will one day tell him how her husband fought to save both their lives

    Amitpal Singh Bajaj's toddler son has begun asking for his father, his widow said
    Anguished Bandhna Bajaj, 34, said hopes police will soon arrest Roger Bullman
    Fugitive Bullman choked Mr Bajaj to death and fled after being given bail
    Mr Bajaj shielded his wife and son from the intruder and told them to ‘go, go, go’

By Shekhar Bhatia In Singapore For Mailonline

Published: 15:28, 7 September 2019 | Updated: 15:37, 7 September 2019

The widow of slaughtered Briton Amitpal Singh Bajaj has revealed their toddler son has begun asking for his father and how she will one day tell him of his bravery.  An anguished Bandhna Bajaj, 34, said she hopes police will soon arrest fugitive Roger Bullman who choked her husband to death and then fled after being given bail.  In her first full interview, she told Mail Online that she dearly loved her Sikh husband of ten years, but that love grew stronger as he fought to protect his wife and 20-month-old son Veer.  ‘When I saw Amitpal protect me and my son like that, I think I have never loved him as much as I loved him at that moment,’ she said.

‘I don’t think everyone could do what he did. I don’t think I could have done that.  The fact that he gave me time to run with our son, shows that he put our lives before his.  I have a lot of respect for him because even in our religion we are taught to have courage and be selfless. But to actually act upon it is a different thing.  He just came in front of me and was like ‘‘go, go, go‘’ and my love for him will go on forever and stronger.  My husband named my son Veer which means strength and he always wanted him to be a warrior with his mind.  He said “If you are strong in your mind you will be strong in your life” so I will always remind Veer of that."

Mr Bajaj, also 34, from Southall, London, was choked to death by martial arts expert and former soldier Bullman at the Centara Grand Hotel in the holiday resort of Pukhet on August 21st.  Bullman, who had been drinking, burst into their room and killed Mr Bajaj after he had shielded his wife and son from the intruder and pleaded with his wife to ‘go, go, go’.  Mrs Bajaj has revealed she and her husband had been scared by aggressive shouting and swearing which went on from midnight and over four hours from the room next to theirs where Bullman was staying with his girlfriend.  This was followed by the slaying of Mr Bajaj, an IT expert, as Mrs Bajaj took their son to safety. She said Bullman also searched for her as she hid and that she was injured in the incident.  Recovering at home with her son in Singapore, she said she wanted her husband’s courage to be recognised against Bullman’s brutality.  Their life together was cut short on a trip which was taken to celebrate their 10th wedding anniversary.  She revealed how the proud Sikh from London has wooed her even though she had been living in Sydney, Australia at the time with the help of the internet.  They met at a mutual friend’s wedding in Singapore and ‘clicked’ straight away.  ‘I liked his sense of humour. It was very dry and very British. I enjoyed talking to him. He was very confident and friendly.’

After the wedding they headed in opposite directions. Mr Bajaj to Britain and his future wife back down under.  ‘We shared a lot of interests together and we became friends It went on with the help of Skype and we’d just chat together and before long we realised we were really similar.  I liked his confidence, the way he spoke and his British accent and I was attracted to him.  I was only 18, but I really felt that I had a connection with him. After about two years I realised I really liked him and we took it forward and we got engaged when I was 21.’

She said he ‘really made an effort’ to make regular 10,000 mile trips to Sydney by doing odd jobs while studying to pay for air fares.  He used to save up from the jobs he did. He was still at university in Bedfordshire, but he missed his graduation ceremony for his IT BSc degree to come and see me too.’

Mrs Bajaj, who graduated in economics and sociology at the University of South Wales, married her husband a year after graduating in Singapore where she was born.  The couple moved to Norwood Green in London and lived there for six years and shuttled between Malaysia and Singapore for his IT consultancy work.  He was also a busy charity worker and practiced the Sikh system of ‘Seva’ where members of the religion are motivated to help others selflessly without seeking acknowledgement or thanks.  Mr Bajaj was a passionate Manchester United fan and would visit Old Trafford to see his team play regularly when he was in the UK and saw them play in Singapore in July.  His widow said he looked forward to the time when their son had grown up and he could watch the team on TV with him despite the time differences with the UK which means matches are screened late at night in Singapore.  ‘He loved the atmosphere when he was in the stadium here seeing Manchester United, sent me videos of the crowd and said he couldn’t wait to take Veer to matches when he was older.’

Mr Bajaj kept a daily journal and said it was important to be able to reflect on your day and was a follower of Stoicism.  ‘He felt the philosophy was similar to the Sikh religion because it made one think of your actions and thoughts and live a fulfilling kind of life.  He was a very loving and protecting father. He told me he had never been in love (like he became with his son) with somebody that he didn’t even know and then suddenly they become your world.  He was very hands on and over the past few months he would make him sleep at night because he said he wanted that bonding time. He would read him stories about our Gurus and would sing to him.  Veer really misses him. He is asking for him almost every night because he prefers his dad making him sleep.  Even today he told me he is missing he because he can say a few words.  Every morning when I wake up it is the hardest because I feel I have to re-live that feeling again of not having him.  I do think it like a nightmare. Sometimes I think that he is on a business trip and he will come back but then I tell myself he isn’t coming back.  I guess I have to be strong for Veer as well and if I completely lose it then it will be very hard for him.  Amitpal was very caring and sensitive. He always took care of my feelings.’

Referring to Bullman, she said: ‘He shouldn’t have been able to get bail in the first place. It wouldn’t happen in the UK.  ‘We never complained to the hotel. He was so loud, so violent. We feared for our son’s safety. It was so scary.  We had never met him before. It was a complete random stranger that broke into our room.  It was all very shocking. He was saying ''F-you'' loudly, screaming loudly and screaming.’

She said there had been no confrontation or provocation with Bullman until he burst into their hotel room.  Instead, she said she and her husband had been frightened by aggressive shouting and swearing and the sound of objects being thrown in Bullman’s room where he was staying with his girlfriend Elvira Olsen.  The abusive language and raised voice went on for several hours, but she said no complaint was lodged from them with staff at the Centara Grand Hotel in Phuket.  Mr Bajaj was choked to death by Bullman, who admitted killing him to police.  Mrs Bajaj, in statements to her lawyers and police, said she and her husband and their 20-month-old son Veer had arrived in Phuket for a short break on August 18 and checked into the hotel’s room 345.  They had a peaceful and restful first couple of days and on the night of 20th August swam in the resort’s pool, had dinner and turned in at 11pm after putting their son to bed.  Mrs Bajaj said: ‘We were due to check-out for our flight the next day and at around 11pm, we got into bed.  Around midnight, we started hearing noises and general rowdiness from the room next door. This was the first time we heard any sounds from there.  We could hear objects being thrown around, with the man swearing “f*** you” many times. It sounded like there was a man abusing a lady, though we could not tell if any of the objects that we heard were being thrown actually hit her.  We did hear her scream 2-3 times during this episode, as if she was being attacked.  I recall my husband saying, “I am fearing for my life”. The man’s speech was very powerful and angry. This continued until about 1am. I was awake the whole time.  I was genuinely frightened and fearful and suggested to my husband that we should call the hotel reception.  He thought otherwise. He was concerned that if we were to call the hotel reception, the man would find out that we had complained and may want to harm us.  He said that we should just wait it out and that the episode would die down on its own.  By this time, Veer had awoken. I gave him some milk and turned on some white noise on my phone so that he could get back to sleep, which he did.  My husband and I then prayed together and eventually there was silence.  But I could not get back to sleep and shortly after 2am, the noise started up again.  I searched for the phone number of the hotel reception on Google and saved it in my phone. At about 2.46am, I called this number to test if it was the right one.  The call lasted about 5 seconds. Shortly thereafter, things quietened down somewhat. My husband went to sleep, but I kept awake and used my phone.’

She said that shortly before 4am the loud noises from the next room started again.  ‘I heard some loud noises from next door. This time, it sounded as if the noises were moving very quickly towards our balcony.  I woke my husband up and he said he thought someone was going to break into our room, and that I should quickly call for help.’

Her phone log showed she placed a call at 3.58am and made a second call a few minutes later to tell the reception that Bullman had broken down the wooden partition separating the rooms.  Her third call was made as Bullman entered the room.  She said: ‘He suddenly appeared in our room. He was red in the face, fully naked, and charged quickly towards us while making animalistic sounds.  ‘He was kicking and punching all the time. I said into the phone words to the effect of “he’s in come quickly send someone”. The reply was “ok”.  I had never encountered, seen or heard Bullman before and had no idea who this complete stranger was and why he had barged into our room in the middle of the night for no apparent reason.  He looked all charged up and very focused on attacking us.  My husband came between me and Bullman and told me to quickly leave with Veer.  Bullman was raining blows on my husband, who had raised his arms in self-protection.  There was a huge struggle during which I sustained a large bruise on my right arm.  As I was leaving, I turned around and saw that my husband was on the floor, halfway out of the main door.  He was not moving and looked unconscious. I also saw Bullman, who looked angry that my son and I were escaping. At this point, Veer was still asleep.  While I was running away, I could hear Bullman from within the room, shouting threateningly at me and saying something like “where are you” or “where are you going”.  I ran to the lift, went down two floors, and took the stairs the rest of the way down. I then took cover beneath the stairs amongst the trees, from where I had a view of the corridors and the entrance to our room.  I hid because I felt that Bullman was trying to get to me.  I thought I saw a figure running about and screaming, but could not see clearly as I was not wearing my spectacles. I was fearful of peeking out too much lest Bullman notice me.’

As she hid in the trees, she placed five more calls to the hotel reception asking for help for her husband.  Security officials arrived to find Mr Bajaj lying prostrate outside their room with Bullman continuing to hold him in a choke hold.  Police arrested a crying Bullman minutes later and he was charged with manslaughter before being allowed his freedom on bail.  Mrs Bajaj said she left Thailand on the same day her husband died and did not know Bullman had been given his freedom until she read about in on Mail Online after arriving back in Singapore.  Police in Thailand say they are conducting a huge manhunt for Bullman who has vanished after failing to appear at Phuket Provincial Court as part of his bail conditions.  Bullman’s lawyer Sulman Hussain,who is based in Oslo, said he had been unable to reach his client and had no clue to his whereabouts.  He said Bullman, a former soldier and bodyguard, had told him he intended to appear at his trial and tell a court how he came to kill Mr Bajaj.  He was seen sunning himself and swimming in a hotel pool when he should have been in court to assess his bail days before he vanished.  In his only interview before he went on the run, Bullman told Mail Online that ‘adrenalin’ had got the better of him when he clashed with Mr Bajaj.  He said that he had learned how to restrain people (by a choke hold) while working with psychiatric patients for 14 years.  He added: ‘Adrenalin took me over. I didn't want to kill him. I didn't know he was dead until the police told me he had died in hospital.  I have worked with physchiatric patients for 14 years and that is how you must restrain them (choke hold)." 

Recalling the evening of August 21st he said he had earlier been singing karoke and added: ‘I was with my girlfriend and we were happy that night.  I am sorry, really sorry. I am a father too and I can understand how his wife must be as they have a child.'

Bullman said he was missing his daughter and produced his cell phone which had a string of messages from her with heart emojis.  'I am not a monster. I have a nine-year-old daughter who I may not see again for a long time.  I am going to jail for between three and ten years and at my age of 54 it is not going to be easy.  They make it tougher for you, the other guys, if you are older.  I am lost. My girlfriend has gone home and I am alone here.'

Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has been urged to help ensure the Bullman isn’t allowed to flee back to his native Norway.  Mr Raab and MP Virendra Sharma, who represents Ealing Southall where the family of the victim Amitpal Singh Bajaj live, have been told of the family’s fears that killer Roger Bullman will attempt to flee overseas.  Britian’s United Sikhs association, which has been supporting Bhandna Kaur, widow of Mr Bajaj and his family, said Thai officials should have known Bullman was ‘an obvious flight risk’.  The organisation contacted the MPs on behalf of Mr Bajaj’s parents, who live in Southall, London.  A spokeswoman said: ‘The family requested an urgent meeting and assistance as they fear that there is a real risk that Roger Bullman will abscond and justice will be denied to Amitpal Singh’s family.’

They have asked Mr Raab to raise an objection to Bullman’s bail on the grounds that he will flee and for Interpol to be alerted.  Mr Bajaj’s family fear he has already slipped out of Thailand, but Phuket police say they are confident he will be re-arrested and oput in jail until his trial.

112
https://metro.co.uk/2019/06/09/losing-a-grandparent-can-be-one-of-the-most-isolating-tragedies-youll-experience-9775191/

Losing a grandparent can be one of the most isolating tragedies you’ll experience
author Megan Ward Sunday 9 Jun 2019 10:31 am

In one of the best books I read last year, Not Working by Lisa Owens, a character describes a grandparent dying as akin to an engagement: life-changing and all-consuming when it happens to you, but when it happens to someone else it’s hard to give a sh*t. My grandad died six weeks ago. For the most part, my friends have shown this quote to be wholly inaccurate. They’ve messaged to check on me and got drunk with me to take my mind off it and asked after my family. In the wider scheme of things, however, I’ve found this quote to hit the nail bang on the head. When I tell people my grandad died, often people say nothing and change the subject. There’s an atmosphere of ‘so what? That happens to everyone’. Now that it’s been six weeks, people seem to be surprised that I’m still as devastated as I am. It’s confusing to me. Why don’t we consider losing a grandparent the same level of tragedy we would consider an immediate family member?

And why is losing a grandparent in your twenties a particularly isolating tragedy?

I can understand it partially. Not everyone is close with their grandparents. For some, grandparents are seen once a year at Christmas, and they send a cheque on your birthday. That’s the extent of the relationship. For others, unfortunately, they lost their grandparents young, so the tragedy is not in their passing, but in not having the chance to know them.  I was lucky to have the relationship I did have with my granddad, but I know it’s not something everyone can understand. For those of us experiencing this loss, it’s made all the more isolating by the fact that in your twenties you are apart from those who feel it as hard as you do. Instead of living with family, you most likely live with friends, roommates, or a partner. They may mean the best, but there is a degree of separation to the tragedy, which means there’s only so much they can do to alleviate grief. Your friends most likely never met your grandparents. My friends know my parents and my brother, but they didn’t know my granddad. They don’t have a tangible connection to the loss. Moreover, your days are now filled up with work. Keeping busy is good, but not having time to process your emotions and having to put on a happy face for eight hours Monday to Friday will wear you thin. You’re left desperately needing space in your day to feel the raw grief again. Then there’s the fact that it isn’t easy to discuss death. I message my best friend saying ‘I want to die’ several times a day, from when I miss my bus to when a man tells me to smile. But actually talking about real death isn’t something I have the language for.  Co-workers don’t appreciate the depth of the grief, friends mean well, but often can’t truly understand, and you don’t have space to feel devastated. If you’re in the same boat, please know you aren’t alone. I’m always one step away from a breakdown now. I got served by a man with the same name as my grandad in Pret and I burst into tears in the queue. Sainsbury’s had a really specific display of cards for grandads and I cried in self-checkout. I was doing my morning crossword and one of the answers was ‘funeral’ and I held back from weeping on the District Line. I’m scared and it’s okay if you are too. The death of a grandparent should be seen for the tragedy it is. One of my grandad’s favourite phrases was: ‘Stick with me and you’ll be alright’.

How am I meant to be alright now?

113
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/apr/22/you-can-love-more-than-one-person-in-your-lifetime-dating-after-a-partners-death

‘You can love more than one person in your lifetime’: dating after a partner’s death

How easy is it to start a relationship after being bereaved?

And how do new lovers cope with an idolised ‘ex’?

Three couples tell their stories

Carole Henderson was only 40 when she lost her husband Kevin to skin cancer in 2006. As she struggled with the pain of her partner’s death, she found that her social life was beginning to disappear. “So many people didn’t know how to act around me or said silly, hurtful things.”

Eighteen months on, she was ready to start dating again. “I had reached the point where I loved Kevin, but was no longer in love with him,” she says. “I wasn’t looking for a husband, but I was lonely and wanted to enjoy male company.”

Having met Kevin when she was a teenager, however, she found jumping back into the dating pool a daunting experience. Many men were put off by the fact she had been widowed, too. She enjoyed a year-long relationship with another widower, but it wasn’t until 2012, six years after losing Kevin, that she started dating Ian, whom she has since married. They were friends before a relationship began to develop.  “Initially, I was so excited; I didn’t think too much about her previous relationship and how that could affect us,” says Ian.

As his feelings for Carole grew, though, he had a few concerns. Seeing pictures of Kevin around the house was a bit intimidating, and he was nervous about meeting Kevin’s family, with whom Carole maintained a close relationship. “In the end, it turned out my imagination was far from reality. They were lovely, and I think they were just pleased to see Carole happy again.”

It helped that Carole was so open with him. Nothing was out of bounds. He quickly became comfortable asking questions about her past.  “When we started dating, I was divorced and I felt I had made a lot of mistakes,” he says. “Carole is very emotionally astute and she encouraged me to do some of the Grief Recovery Method. It helped me to manage my own insecurities and emotions much better.”

Carole discovered this programme, which is designed to help people come to terms with loss, after Kevin died. She has since become a senior trainer and managing director of the UK team.  When their relationship became more serious, Ian moved in to Carole’s house, but he says he never felt entirely at home surrounded by the furniture and paintings that she had chosen with Kevin. After talking things through, they decided to move to create a home together.  “There are still pictures of Kevin in our house, but, although he’s a presence, I don’t feel threatened,” says Ian. “I’m grateful to Kevin, because it’s made Carole who she is. She wouldn’t be the woman I fell in love with if she hadn’t had that experience.”

But other couples find that accepting the past isn’t quite as simple. Joanna met her partner Colin (both names have been changed) on a dating website, 13 months after her husband died of cancer in early 2017. “When John was ill, he told me he wanted me to move on after he died so that I could be happy again. He said he wanted someone else to see my eyes sparkle.”

She and Colin hit it off from the moment they met, but she says he struggles to come to terms with the fact she has been widowed.  John and I had been together for six years and he was my soulmate. I think Colin felt like he was in competition.”

Social media has made life harder, as it brings up so many memories. “On one occasion, Colin came across some old Facebook photos, which really upset him, because it was evidence of how much John and I adored each other. He told me he wasn’t sure if he could live up to John and that’s when his insecurities began to affect our relationship.”

She says he has never felt comfortable meeting John’s family and didn’t want to visit her previous home, which she had shared with her husband.  Although it can be difficult, Joanna works hard to put herself in Colin’s shoes and talk to him about how he is feeling. “I care deeply for Colin. You can’t compare two relationships, because they’re two totally different people. It’s like having more than one child. You can love more than one person in your lifetime.”

She says she is no less happy than she was just “a different kind of happy”.  Respecting former and current partners is a balancing act for many widows. Carole says that while she celebrates Kevin’s memory on special days, she doesn’t talk about him all the time, because that would be disrespectful to Ian. As well as avoiding comparisons, she says it is important to remember your previous partner in a realistic way. “There’s a tendency to view someone who’s died through rose tinted spectacles, which can be hard for a new partner. I loved Kevin deeply and he was a fantastic man, but he wasn’t perfect.”

When anyone starts a relationship, particularly later in life, it is not unusual for jealousy to surface. We all carry emotional baggage, whether or not bereavement is part of it. But Carole and Ian’s attitude proves it is possible to respect the past without comparing it with the present.  For Thomas Dowds and Moira Stockman, who married earlier this year, jealousy has never been an issue. When they met, they had both been widowed, which they say made it easier to talk about their former partners.  “My family and I were on holiday in Florida in 2016 when my wife Rhonda suffered a sudden cardiac arrest,” says Thomas.

He attempted CPR and an ambulance was called, but there wasn’t anything they could do. In the weeks that followed, he says, there was no opportunity for him to grieve, because he was trying to stay strong for their two girls, who were seven and nine.  After the dust settled and his well-wishers went back to their normal lives, Thomas sought counselling to help him to cope with his loss. He also joined Widowed and Young, a charity support group for widows and widowers in the UK. “I ended up making friends with Moira and it felt good to talk to someone who was in the same boat. She’d lost her husband to leukaemia several years before and had two children around the same age as mine.”

Following Rhonda’s death, Thomas’s girls were reluctant to talk about their mum, for fear of upsetting him. But meeting Moira’s children meant they were able to open up for the first time and talk about their shared experiences.  “When Rhonda passed away, I thought I’d never want to find love again. As well as dealing with grief, I was so scared of losing another person that I loved.” But after a month of getting to know Moira, those feelings began to change. “We had so much in common that it progressed naturally into a relationship and it felt completely right.”

Moira, whose partner Alastair died when her children were toddlers, says they were aware they needed to take the relationship slowly. Although the four children got on brilliantly, her eldest son struggled to come to terms with the idea of her and Thomas as a couple, because he was worried about losing his mum to him. “With lots of support and counselling, he came round to the idea of us being together. One day he told me that he knew Thomas was a good man, and I think that was a real turning point for us.”

The couple say that talking about their past relationships is an important part of their marriage and helps the children to understand where they came from. Rather than “Mum” and “Dad”, “his children call me Moira and mine call him Thomas, because we want to be respectful to Rhonda and Alastair,” says Moira. “They might be gone, but they’ll always be their parents.”

Thomas adds that being widowed has taught him to enjoy every happy moment and stop sweating the small stuff. It is a common philosophy among those who have experienced loss. Although he knows he and other widowers will always feel sad about the loss of their partners, finding love again has given him a new lease of life. “Our children are really happy for us, and it has helped them open up about their own feelings of bereavement. It feels like we’ve taken two broken families and made them whole again.”

114
Miscarriage, Stillborn and Infant Loss / Edwards' syndrome (trisomy 18)
« on: August 13, 2019, 09:01:15 PM »
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/edwards-syndrome/

Edwards' syndrome (trisomy 18)

Edwards' syndrome, also known as trisomy 18, is a rare but serious genetic condition that causes a wide range of severe medical problems.  Sadly, most babies with Edwards' syndrome will die before or shortly after being born.  Some babies with less severe types of Edwards' syndrome, such as mosaic or partial trisomy 18, do survive beyond a year and, very rarely, into early adulthood. But they are likely to have severe physical and mental disabilities.

Cause of Edwards' syndrome

Each cell in your body normally contains 23 pairs of chromosomes, which carry the genes you inherit from your parents. But a baby with Edwards' syndrome has three copies of chromosome number 18, instead of two.  The presence of this extra chromosome in cells severely disrupts normal development.  Edwards' syndrome is rarely inherited and is not caused by anything the parents have done. The development of three copies of chromosome 18 usually happens at random during the formation of either the egg or sperm.  As this happens randomly, it's extremely unlikely for parents to have more than one pregnancy affected by Edwards' syndrome. However, the chance of having a baby with Edwards' syndrome does increase as the mother gets older.

Mosaic trisomy 18

Mosaic trisomy 18 can be a less severe form of Edwards' syndrome, as only some of the cells have the extra copy of chromosome 18, rather than every cell.  How severely affected the baby is depends on the number of and type of cells that have the extra chromosome. Some babies may only be mildly affected, while some can be severely disabled.  Around seven in every 10 babies born with mosaic trisomy will live for at least a year and, in rare cases, may survive into early adulthood.

Partial trisomy 18

In partial trisomy 18 only a section of the additional chromosome 18 is present in the cells, rather than a whole additional chromosome 18.  This type of Edwards' syndrome is more likely if one the parents has a minor alteration in their chromosomes, so blood samples are often requested from both parents to check for this and to help them understand the risks for future pregnancies.  How severely affected the baby is will depend on which part of chromosome 18 is present in the cells.

Symptoms of Edwards' syndrome

Babies with Edwards' syndrome can have a wide range of different problems.  Physical signs of Edwards' syndrome include:

    low birthweight
    a small, abnormally shaped head
    a small jaw and mouth
    long fingers that overlap, with underdeveloped thumbs and clenched fists
    low-set ears
    smooth feet with rounded soles
    a cleft lip and palate
    an exomphalos (where the intestines are held in a sac outside the tummy)

Babies with Edwards' syndrome also typically have:

    heart and kidney problems
    feeding problems leading to poor growth
    breathing problems
    hernias in the wall of their stomach (where internal tissues push through a weakness in the muscle wall)
    bone abnormalities such as a curved spine
    frequent infections of the lungs and urinary system
    a severe learning disability

Diagnosing Edwards' syndrome

During pregnancy

Pregnant women are offered screening for Edwards' syndrome between 10 and 14 weeks of pregnancy to assess the chances of their baby having the condition.  This screening test is known as the combined test, and it also screens for Down's syndrome and Patau's syndrome.  During the combined test you will have a blood test and a special ultrasound scan where the fluid at the back of the baby's neck (nuchal translucency) is measured.  Read more about screening for Edwards' syndrome at 10-14 weeks.  If the combined test shows that you have a higher risk of having a baby with Edwards' syndrome, you will be offered a diagnostic test to find out for certain if your baby has the condition.  This involves analysing a sample of your baby's cells to check if they have an extra copy of chromosome 18.  There are two different ways of getting this sample of cells chorionic villus sampling, which collects a sample from the placenta, or amniocentesis, which collects a sample of the amniotic fluid from around your baby.  These are invasive tests that do have a risk of causing a miscarriage. Your doctor will discuss these risks with you.  Later in pregnancy, usually when you are 18-21 weeks pregnant, you will also be offered a scan that looks for physical abnormalities, known as congenital anomalies.

Read more about the mid-pregnancy scan.

A newer test has also been developed that can be performed by taking a sample of blood from the mother, at 10-12 weeks, and testing the baby's DNA that is found within it. This is known as "non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT)" and is currently available privately, but will be offered on the NHS from 2018.  The charity Antenatal Results and Choices (ARC) has more information about NIPT.

After birth

If doctors believe a baby has Edwards' syndrome when it is born they will take a blood sample from the baby. This will be examined to see if the baby's cells have extra copies of chromosome 18.

Making a decision

If your baby is diagnosed with Edwards' syndrome during your pregnancy your doctor will talk to you about how you want to move forward. They will discuss the options of either continuing with the pregnancy or ending it with a termination, as it is such a severe condition.  This is a very difficult situation and it is normal to feel a whole range of emotions. It may help to talk to your doctor, partner, family and friends about what you are thinking and how you are feeling.  If your baby is diagnosed with Edwards' syndrome, either before birth or afterwards, you'll be offered counselling and support.  You can also contact ARC, which has information about screening tests and how you might feel if you are told your baby does have, or might have, a problem.  ARC has a helpline that can be reached on 0845 077 2290, or 020 7713 7486 from a mobile, Monday to Friday, 10am-5.30pm. The helpline is answered by trained staff, who can offer information and support.  Read more about what happens when antenatal screening finds a possible problem.

Treating Edwards' syndrome

There is no cure for Edwards' syndrome and the symptoms can be very difficult to manage. You are likely to need help from a wide range of health professionals.  Treatment will focus on immediately life-threatening issues, such as infections and heart problems. Your child may also need to be fed through a feeding tube, as feeding is often a problem.  If limb abnormalities affect your child's movements as they get older, they may benefit from supportive treatment, such as physiotherapy and occupational therapy.  Depending on your child's specific problems, they may need specialist care in hospital or a hospice, or you may be able to look after them at home with appropriate support.

Advice for carers

Caring for a child with Edwards' syndrome is mentally and physically challenging. Most carers will need social and psychological support.  Your guide to care and support provides lots of advice on how you can take time to look after yourself, including:

    keeping fit and healthy
    getting a break from caring
    getting legal support and advocacy
    taking care of your wellbeing

You can also visit the SOFT UK website for support and more information on Edwards' syndrome, and to contact other families affected by the condition.

Information about your child

If your child has Edwards' syndrome, your clinical team will pass information about them on to the National Congenital Anomaly and Rare Diseases Registration Service (NCARDRS).  This helps scientists look for better ways to prevent and treat this condition. You can opt out of the register at any time.  Find out more about the register.

Page last reviewed: 7 September 2017
Next review due: 7 September 2020

115
End of Life / Bereavement: starts before life ends
« on: August 13, 2019, 08:43:51 PM »
https://bestendings.com/medical-decisions/bereavement-end-of-ife/

Bereavement: starts before life ends
Bereavement and the process of dying

Often, the reality of death doesn’t hit home until seeing the physical stages of the body shutting down. This can be upsetting for those watching, but is a normal part of the dying process.There are strategies and treatments to minimize any discomfort and suffering

1.  Hands, feet and legs may feel cool or cold to the touch, Fingers, earlobes, lips and nail beds may look bluish or light gray.
2.  Blood pressure gradually goes down and heart rate gets faster but weaker.
3.  A purplish or blotchy red-blue coloring on knees and/ or feet (mottling) is a sign that death is very near.
4.  Because the body no longer needs large amounts of energy and because the digestive system is slowing down, the need for and interest in food (and eventually fluids) gradually lessens.
5.  As eating and drinking taper off, the body naturally becomes dehydrated. When this occurs, the dying person becomes sleepier and may be less aware of pain or discomfort. This is a normal part of the dying process and there are ways to keep the person comfortable throughout this time.
6  Fever may or may not occur, but is common nearer to death.
7  Secretions usually thicken and build up in the lungs and/or the back of the throat.
8.  Breathing may sound moist, congested called ‘wet voice’ or like a rattle.  This may come and go and is rarely bothersome to the dying person closer to the time of death.
9.  Progressively deeper and sometimes faster breathing, followed by a gradual decrease that results in a temporary stop in breathing. This is called Cheyne Stokes breathing
10.  Restlessness, agitation or delirium which may be a result of less oxygen to the brain, metabolic changes or physical pain.

From the mouths of the dying

“It is not unusual for a dying person to speak in metaphors about dying, for example speaking about death in terms of travel or a journey, getting to the door, or finding the key. It is not uncommon to see a dying person calling or reaching out to a deceased family member or to a religious figure or speak of visits from or dreams about those who have died before them.  These reports have almost always been comforting to the dying person. Rather than deny these descriptions, or correct these reports, it is important to try to listen and accept what is being said”.

Bereavement and mourning: before, during and after

Bereavement is the period after a loss during which grief is experienced and mourning occurs. The time spent in a period of bereavement depends on how attached the person was to the person who died, and how much time was spent anticipating the loss.  Advances in modern medicine mean dying and death have undergone a shift: a life-threatening disease doesn’t always mean an immediate ‘death sentence’.  We survive months or even years before dying even from  a terminal illness. While it means more time with our loved ones, prolonged dying and death can also prolong emotional pain, exhaust caregivers and cause family issues, baggage, patterns and rifts to take front and center stage.  In their book, Saying Goodbye: How Families can Find Renewal Through Loss Dr Joseph Nowinski and Barbara Okun summarize the five stages of grief:

Crisis. Family grief begins when the family learns that a loved one has a terminal disease. Feelings of anxiety, anger, confusion, and fear may arise. The equilibrium of the family has been disrupted.

Unity. The reality of impending death forces family members to put even longstanding resentments or grudges on hold to pull together to care for the dying loved one.

Upheaval. In a protracted illness, the unity experienced starts to fade, and issues put off to deal with later eventually rear their head, with guilt, anger, and resentment starting to emerge. It is most important, at this stage that members of the family communicate effectively with each other and with other loved ones.

Resolution. Upheaval created by the illness subsides. The protracted nature of contemporary grief presents families now with an opportunity to resolve any long-standing issues and to redefine each person’s role in the family.

Renewal. The final stage of grief begins at the funeral and expresses itself through the celebration of the life of the now-deceased family member. The interconnected system of individuals that make up the family, through acceptance of change, rather than its resistance, is given the opportunity to become stronger, more resilient and thus find its new equilibrium.

Mourning: rituals, customs and culture

Mourning is the process by which people adjust to a loss and often entails cultural customs and rituals. Dr Niamh van Meines a Nurse Practitioner and Hospice & Palliative Care Consultant tells of her experiences with culture and ritual at life’s end:

“The woman was overwhelmed with grief when she walked into the room and saw her mother silently and peacefully dead in the hospital bed. Her death was expected, but as always, no-one is ever quite ready to let go. She started to wail loudly and speak directly to her deceased mother about the pain she was inflicting by dying. She was compelled to hold her prayer beads and started to dance around the room. Little footsteps, singing and chanting, crying and wailing in a pattern that looked like she was in a trance. Occasionally, she would lay across her deceased mother with her arms outstretched. I approached her gently, touched her lightly on the back, apologized for interrupting her and asked “Are you OK? Is there anything that you need from me?” She stopped the dance, composed herself and answered “No, I’m fine.” She then returned to her trance, dance and chant. Reassured that she was not losing control, I relaxed and supported her. I observed and learned about my own lack of knowledge about different cultures and their rituals at the time of death."

116
Articles / Have the British forgotten how to grieve?
« on: August 08, 2019, 09:33:27 PM »
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/10639359/Have-the-British-forgotten-how-to-grieve.html

Have the British forgotten how to grieve?
Some countries 'celebrate' the loss of a loved one, others have prolonged mourning rituals. In Britain, we rush back to work after the funeral. Have we got death all wrong?

By Clover Stroud
7:00AM GMT 20 Feb 2014

When my mother died in December I understood what it was to be grief-stricken, an apt description since losing her was like a physical blow. “Let your feelings out,” a friend said when I stood before her speechless, unable to articulate the enormity of what was happening.

“Do whatever feels right.”

It was heartfelt advice, but knowing what to “do” let alone how to go about it in the “right” way defeated me.  That the rest of the world was carrying on, regardless, seemed grotesque. How can traffic lights still change colour, I wondered as I went to register her death. WH Auden’s poem about grief, “Stop all the Clocks” “Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead/Scribbling on the sky the message He is Dead” was suddenly an appropriate command to the world.

Planning and executing Mum’s memorial service brought me closer to the solemnity I found myself craving. I found it in her favourite hymns and prayers, which we read beside extracts from TS Eliot, Louis MacNeice and The Merchant of Venice. After the funeral, we had a party with more laughing than crying. And yet, I wanted more.  Grief, I now understand, is a sort of madness, in the same way that falling in love is madness. Evolutionary biologists believe our bodies produce stress hormones as a reaction to separation. “Grief in its most basic form represents an alarm reaction set off by a deficit signal in the behavioural system underlying attachment,” writes Prof John Archer of the University of Central Lancashire in The Nature of Grief. 

And yet, while we celebrate lovers, today we alienate the bereaved, treating grief as a private affair. I wanted a place to wail, light flares and chant incantations as old as the Earth, but got a distinct sense that society, at least, didn’t want me to behave like that. Was I right?

Should we be approaching death entirely differently and if so, how?

“Contemporary life isn’t big on ritual, even at those moments that can define us, like bereavement,” says writer and philosopher Jules Evans, author of Philosophy for Life and policy director for the Centre for the History of Emotions at London University. “This is a shame, as it’s hard to invent your own response to death. Ritual is comforting, enabling us to express something we struggle to put into words.”

According to new research by Dying Matters, a coalition working to get more people discussing death and bereavement, only 25 per cent of bereaved people across Britain feel supported following a death, while 32 per cent don’t feel their employer treated them compassionately.  Psychotherapist Ingrid Collins believes the ritualised grieving in more traditional cultures offers a solace we lack in our secular society. “They surround the bereaved with love and comfort, but we hurry through it, expecting people to be back at work after a couple of weeks. We want to soldier on regardless of the emotional cost.”

Soldiering on is a peculiarly English trait. The Victorians were the last generation to make a pageant of grief female mourners were even required to wear black underwear but clinging to elaborate public mourning practices during the First World War could have brought the country to its knees. Instead, the message that pain and grief should be packed away “in your old kit bag” was a powerful one.  In her book Death in War and Peace, Pat Jalland argues that Churchill’s propaganda broadcasts lauding the indomitable Blitz spirit were partly responsible for entrenching within our collective national psyche the sense that grief should be suppressed. It’s something we cling to, despite the psychobabble of the countercultural rebellion of the mid-20th century, when services like Cruse, the UK’s largest bereavement charity, emerged.  As a result, says Evans, grief has become medicalised, rather than accepted as an inevitable response to a universal human condition. “The human emotions engendered by ‘ashes to ashes’ or a requiem Mass have saved people from the pits of despair as often as modern psychiatry,” he argues.

Death terrifies us, since we have, as the historian Philippe Ariès argued in The Hour of Our Death, “banished it from our society”. “Animal slaughter has been shifted out of sight and human illness moved discreetly into hospital. Instead of accepting death as natural, medicine makes us think something can always be done to stave it off,” says Evans, pointing out that many of us never see a dead body until we’re adults.

But are cultures with more extended mourning rituals really better off?

If I’d been a Hindu would the elaborate process of building a funeral pyre been more comforting for me?

Would I have coped better if my mother’s funeral had been a community occasion, as it is in Japan?

“After my father died in October I was shattered, so following distinct steps about how to dress, eat, behave carried me along and absolved me of making decisions I wasn’t capable of,” says Abigail Cohen, who grieved according to the ritualised process of Jewish mourning called shiva.

After the funeral Abigail was confined to her house for a week, wearing a black funeral dress symbolically torn across her heart. Friends brought food, but she wasn’t obliged to speak. Instead she was “like a baby, in a role of complete surrender, protected from the world. My non-Jewish friends who’ve experienced loss are envious.”

In Irish communities, grief helps cement family relationships. “I’ve noticed a return to the tradition of ‘waking’ the dead, or laying out the body, in private homes,” says Rosa ­Corcoran, from Drogheda, whose grandmother was waked in a museum she founded. “The return of the old ways is a welcome response to years of treating grief with antidepressants.”

While we might have lost many rituals ourselves, multiculturalism means we’re surrounded by examples from other cultures. A Turkish friend tells me about cooking akibe sweets and helva with her mother to mark the 40th day of her brother’s death. “British people are embarrassed by grief,” she says. “In Turkey we know exactly how to behave, how to dress, even what we eat. This doesn’t make it less sad, but it does make the pain less disorientating.”

And yet, while it’s easy to point to the increasingly secular nature of our lives for the erosion of grieving rituals, it’s certainly nothing new. It began with the Reformation, when Luther abolished the Catholic practice of paying for Masses for the dead. By the 17th century, ritualised behaviour such as mourning gloves and funeral parties had expanded to fill the gap Protestantism created. Prof Douglas Davies, director for the Centre of Death and Life Studies at Durham University and author of A Brief History of Death, believes the Poor Law of 1830 was also significant in reinstating ritual, since it stated the bodies of those who died in penury could be confiscated for dissection by medical schools, a practice until then confined to criminals. “Elaborate funerals and a ‘good send off’ arose, as families didn’t want their loved ones treated like rubbish,” says Davies.

Funeral directors who, into the 20th century, were generally the local cabinetmaker and private insurance companies encouraging people to save for funerals emerged then. “Aristocrats had their crypts and mausoleums long before, but by the late 18th century the tradition of a showy funeral was emerging as a middle-class practice.”

The Victorians, inspired by Queen Victoria’s pathological mourning for Prince Albert, revelled in grief, with women wearing black capes and bonnets and glass lockets representing tears. As I stumbled through the days after Mum’s death, dishevelled in jeans and jersey, I couldn’t help feeling that this might have been rather comforting.  When I put this to Prof Tony Walter, director of the University of Bath Centre for Death and Society, he disagrees. “Many women hated the requirements of mourning, and by the late 19th century wanted to reclaim grief as a personal experience,” he tells me.

In her book Mourning Dress, Lou Taylor, professor of dress and textile history at the ­University of Brighton, argues Victorian mourning was actually about sustaining patriarchy, since a woman was expected to mourn longer for her husband or father than mother or baby. By the 1880s, the same upper-class women who were becoming suffragettes rejected what they saw as meaningless rituals subjugating them.  But where does this leave the bereaved today?

When Jo Smythe lost her five-year-old son to cancer, the internet became her lifeline. “It was such a relief finding people who had been through the same experience,” says Jo, a humanist, who channelled her grief into fundraising and volunteering at a cancer charity. “The support and guidance I found from real people online saved me, as I didn’t feel I could talk openly to anyone else about my son’s death.”

It was partly in response to this lack of dialogue about death that in 2011 Jon Underwood developed the first British Death Café, inspired by Swiss sociologist Bernard ­Crettaz’s tradition of café mortels. There are 537 cafés and 6,000 members worldwide, with 142 cafés in Britain. Anyone can join. In early January I sipped tea with two dozen strangers at Stratford upon Avon’s inaugural Death Café.  I found solace in the two hours I spent discussing the single event that unites us all. Some members were recently bereaved, others had lost a child decades before or were “interested in dying and grief, but don’t know where to talk about it”. Conversation ranged from the psychological price of grief to managing a terminal illness, to the merits of a Christian versus humanist funeral. Humanist funerals are slowly gathering momentum, from only 5,000 a decade ago to more than 15,000 today.  “Humanist funerals are often described as a celebration of life, since we emphasise the life you have now, not that of the spirit,” says Isabel Russo, head of ceremonies at the British Humanist Association.

To me this sounds stark, as grieving Mum’s death would have been much harder without my conviction I’ll see her again, but Isabel argues that humanists believe the dead continue to play a dynamic role in life. “While there is love or memory there, the relationship with the living goes on, and humanist funerals can be a brilliant way to mark this.”

Pat Winslow is a humanist celebrant, describing her favourite services as “a bit wild, although never disrespectful. One lady gave her father a coffin like a red toolbox, carried in a silver hearse. She wore a red wedding dress, with her children in her father’s clothes. It was joyous seeing grief experienced like this.”

Pat’s words remind me that while I had to forget the burning ship sent into the sea, there were other, contemporary rituals I could have picked. You can blast your loved one’s ashes into space, or have them made into diamonds. Facebook and the millions of photographs we take also mean there are endless ways to indulge in multimedia mourning.  Douglas Davies suggests that while these rituals around death might have altered, the emotional experience is unchanging across continents and through time. “History shows us people suffer in the same way with the death of a single child today as they would have done when several died in childbirth 200 years ago,” he says. The difference may lie in the fact death feels “unrehearsed, because we’re used to feeling like we’re masters of our own destiny, and suddenly we don’t know what to do”.

To illustrate the unchanging nature of grief, he points me to the epic Gilgamesh, perhaps the oldest written document in the history of mankind. On the death of his friend, Gilgamesh states, “I am afraid of death.” Gilgamesh “makes the same psychological journey you’ll read about in any contemporary self-help manual – his agony, his desire to set up a memorial, and his journey towards a conclusion,” says Prof Davies.

There’s something comforting and comical in thinking I share an emotional experience with Gilgamesh. And grief does change. I can walk though the days now, not stumble; waves of pain still hit me, but it’s not the storm-battered ocean crashing around me that it was in December. But while I want to go on remembering, because, as WB Yeats put it so well, “Lets talk and grieve/For that’s the sweetest music for sad souls,” now, I’m aware of a deafening silence.

117
https://mypositiveoutlooks.com/couple-with-down-syndrome-proves-them-wrong/?fbclid=IwAR0HfzsPJjtxEL7YPSM_yFOjx58DNX_gMrwfsjXgJZPBXVkjrXB1NX0-kxk

Against all odds, couple with Down Syndrome celebrate 22-yrs wedding anniversary
Published by Positive Outlooks on April 17, 2018

Keeping a marriage is not an easy task. We constantly come across the devastating news of Hollywood couples breaking up (we are looking at you Channing Tatum and Jenna Dewan). Is it really hard to attain happily ever after nowadays?

There is a stigma that it will be hard for people with special needs to marry. Many people think that people with a condition like Down’s Syndrome cannot take care of themselves, how will they take care of other people, more or less start a family?

Maryanne and Tommy Pilling are the first couple with Down’s Syndrome to tie the knot in the UK. Their union was greeted with skepticism and some criticism when they got married in an Essex church two decades ago.  These two people with Down’s Syndrome fell in love and eventually marry. Many people thought that they shouldn’t marry and that their relationship will not last. However, they prove that their love is stronger than their condition and tied the knot. In 2017, the couple celebrated their 22nd year as a married couple proving the test of time.  In 1991, Maryanne and Tommy met a day center and dated for 18 months before Tommy popped the question. Celebrating 22 years of marriage is a feat and they received love and admiration from millions of people on social media.  To celebrate their anniversary, they re-enacted their first dance from dirty dancing to remember their big day. Despite many people are in attendance, the couple danced sweetly as if it is only them inside the room.  “My wedding was the best day of my life. I was shocked when Tommy proposed but I didn’t have to think twice about saying yes,” Maryanne shared to Independent.co.uk.

“Tommy and I never argue. I love my husband very much. He is my best friend,” she added.

After the wedding, the couple lives independently in their own home, but Maryanne’s sister Lindi Newman and her family live next door to help out in events that they need assistance.  Their relationship gets stronger and the couple proves that it is a wise decision to wed.  Meanwhile, the couple is grateful to all those that believe in them, especially Maryanne’s mother who supported their decision.  Although Maryanne’s mom received a lot of flak when she allowed the two to marry, she insisted that it was their decision.  “Maryanne had dreamed about a big white wedding since she was a little girl and that’s exactly what she had. It was a beautiful day,” Maryanne’s sister talked about why her mom agreed to her sister’s marriage.

Ms. Newman added that the couple’s relationship offers a positive statement.  “When they walk down the street holding hands they make a statement but in a good way. Some people stare, they assume people with Down’s Syndrome and learning difficulties can’t get married. But we also get so many lovely messages from people who are inspired by their story,” she said.

“People worried about their own children or grandchildren with Down’s Syndrome get hope from Maryanne and Tommy’s story, hope that their children can also fall in love and live happily ever after,” she added.

A Facebook page dedicated to the couple is managed by Maryanne’s sister. The Facebook page chronicles the life of the couple full of lovely photos showing how they spent quality time together. One of the photos showed the couple visiting an Elvis Presley museum and visiting an aquarium in another.  A lot of people are sending them messages congratulating them and wishing them well.  Watch the touching love story of Tommy and Maryanne and believe, once again, that love conquers all.

118
Faith / Grace Is A Divine Scandal, And That's How You Should Preach It
« on: August 02, 2019, 08:20:38 PM »
https://www.sermoncentral.com/pastors-preaching-articles/ray-hollenbach-grace-is-a-divine-scandal-and-that-s-how-you-should-preach-it-2186?ref=PreachingArticleDetails?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=button&utm_campaign=scbpu20190427&maropost_id=742347701&mpweb=256-7809230-742347701

Grace Is A Divine Scandal, And That's How You Should Preach It
By Ray Hollenbach on Apr 24, 2019

If you choose grace as a preaching topic, prepare to be misunderstood. It happened to the Apostle Paul; it can happen to you.  Preaching grace is really a dangerous act: is there anything more "irresponsible" than grace?

It’s the refuge of losers, the hiding place of the harebrained, the only hope at end of the line. How can people learn anything from grace when they are shielded from the fruit of their ways?

How can they grow into responsible adults if they are allowed to avoid the shipwreck of our poor choices?

Sometimes it may be tempting to preach about the predictable world of choice and consequence. Consequence is the lever of choice, tilting upon the worldly fulcrum of cause and effect; sowing and reaping are the dependable laws of nature, and we can find passages of scripture to preach on them. Karma chants responsibility: “Choose, and eat the fruit of your choice.”

As pastors we are tempted to wonder, how can people mature apart from learning the mathematics of choice and consequence?

To look at grace from the outside is to see someone getting off scot-free. The work of grace is the spoiling of an only child. Grace runs counter to good stewardship. Grace is the foolishness of giving a field hand a full day’s pay for but a few hours work.  Oh, but from the inside to taste of grace is to drink the water of life. It’s the meal without the tab; the drinks are on the house. Grace is more and better wine even though the guests are tipsy. Grace is calories that somehow don’t count. Karma is the voice of reason; grace is the voice of love.  But reason cautions us. This makes grace even more dangerous; the unscrupulous can figure the con quickly. Grace can be abused, grace can be played the fool, grace can be wasted but grace doesn’t care. Grace is the divine scandal. Grace is the way of Heaven, where mercy triumphs over judgment not that judgment is unknown but rather tried and found wanting.  Help your church get connected.

Tools for plugging in to community & ministry
Get Started →

Simone Weil said there are but two forces capable of moving the human heart: gravity and grace. Gravity, the great force of nature, exerts its unstoppable influence from the outside; grace, the beautiful power of super nature, floats on air.  And here is our dilemma: we discover that people want grace for ourselves, but choose karma for others. Grace seen from the outside is how rogues get off scot-free. Grace seen from the inside is the spring of life. The trick is to help our congregation see grace from the inside on behalf of others. Grace is more than a gift; it is the example of Heaven. Grace is the way, the truth and the life. Grace calls us not only to taste and see but also to come and follow.  The grand goal of grace is that we would not be mere partakers, but we would become the servants in its grand banquet. Grace calls us to fill the glass of every thirsty soul. As preachers, we should echo that call.

119
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7217297/Murder-suspect-tells-inquest-three-consistent-confessions-1975-killing-invented.html

'We’ve waited 44 years for this day': Mother demands justice as coroner finds her daughter, eight, was unlawfully killed and police are sure chief suspect strangled her and slashed her throat with penknife

    Heartbroken mother has said her daughter's dead 'blighted her family'
    She has called for justice and to get the killer named in order to have 'closure'
    West Midlands police have said they are 'hopeful' of bringing the killer to justice
    John Sir, now 72, made three confessions consistent with Helen Bailey's murder

By Luke Andrews For Mailonline

Published: 16:29, 5 July 2019 | Updated: 17:48, 5 July 2019

The heartbroken mother of an eight-year-old girl found strangled with her throat cut more than 44 years ago has called for justice after a coroner recorded a conclusion of 'unlawful killing' in a re-opened inquest.  Margaret Bailey said her daughter Helen's death had 'blighted' her family and left her 'grieving for all these years'.  John Sir, now 72 and also known as Kenneth Etchells, who made three 'entirely consistent' confessions to killing the schoolgirl between 1978 and 1979, has claimed they were invented so that he could get into Highcroft mental hospital.  After coroner Louise Hunt said she would write to the Crown Prosecution Service to ask them to re-open the case, following the conclusion, West Midlands police said they were 'very hopeful' that they could bring the girls killer to justice.  Helen Bailey was found by her father lying in a woodland near Birmingham with her throat slit the day after she disappeared on August 10.  She was dubbed Little Girl Blue after it emerged that she was wearing her favourite dress when she vanished.  The 86-year-old mother said she 'wants closure' and 'wants to get this man named'.  'We've waited 44 years to this day,' she said, 'so that we can get closure for Helen'.

After her husband found Helen's body she said he stood by it for three hours so he could identify her when the coroner arrived. The was 'tormented every day' by the experience.  'I have grieved for all these years,' she said speaking about her daughter, 'she's never left me really'.

'She's with me all the time, I'm talking about her all the time, my friends all know about her, and my family, everybody knows about it.  It's just blighted our lives. So now it would be lovely to have closure a bit late.  But better late than never.'

Helen's brother Adrian, now 53, said that they were thankful for the help at the moment but that people had made 'serious mistakes' in the past.  'We're still not getting final closure with having somebody arrested, he's still out there,' he said.

West Midlands police have said they have one suspect after re-opening the cold case, but after 'protracted discussions' with the CPS have not been able to agree that the evidence 'meets the charging threshold'.  'Helen's death has remained a mystery for over 40 years, but it is important for her family to have it formally documented that she was unlawfully killed,' said detective chief superintendent Mark Payne.

'Nothing can ever bring Helen back to them, or all the lost years that she should have been with them, but I hope this small recognition can bring some comfort.  This leaves us then with a murder enquiry into an eight-year-old girl's death back in 1975.  We are actively pursuing this investigation with a cold case review and we are very much hopeful of bringing an offender to justice.  Our investigation will remain open and, should any new evidence come to light, we will pursue it.'

The retired receptionist said her daughter Helen had disappeared a few days before the family were due to go on holiday to Cornwall.  She had been desperate to play games with her sibling and his friends after bath time, but after going out searching for them she was never seen alive again.  Margaret said: 'Helen was in the bath and Adrian's friends came to the door and said 'can Helen and Adrian come to the park with us', and Adrian he was 10 said 'do we really have to have Helen with us'.  And I said, 'go on then, I won't tell her'.  So she then washed and dried and she went down into the garden and was obviously looking for him.  And he said to her 'mom said you can't come with us'.  So then they went to one park, she went down to the other park thinking that's where they'd gone.  She went to the wrong park.  So I feel responsible, Adrian feels responsible, but it's all 'if-only' isn't it?'

Two innocent boys were first accused of killing the 'chatty' and 'lively' girl, after some residents thought they were linked to the case.  Margaret said she believed the rumours at the time 'because that's what we were told by the coroner'.  But my husband never believed that, he always thought it was murder and so did my son'.

The case remained untouched until 2014 when a cold case review was opened by West Midlands police.

A pathologist, who examined the original post-mortem photos, said the cuts on her neck, that had previously been described as shallow, were anything but, and also found typical signs of asphyxia.

Heartbroken mother calls for justice 43 years after her daughter was killed

Margaret Bailey, whose daughter was found by her father lying in woodland with her throat slit, called for justice today.  After a coroner recorded a conclusion of unlawful killing she said, 'Well I believed them at the time, that these two boys were responsible, because that's what we were told by the coroner.  We were told it was just an accident, but when I think about it they said it was just a little nick in the jugular vein and she could have got up and walked  way that's what he said.  But my husband never believed that, he always thought it was murder and so did my son.'

But when, six years ago, police told her it was murder she said it was "dreadful" to have discovered the truth had evaded the family for almost 44 years.  The police came to see us, opened the case again and so for the last six years we've known what's happened and it's different to what we were told in the beginning, so we want the truth now.  It was dreadful. My son said he was coming down to see me, and it was such a shock and he said 'mom, it's murder'.  I've never been the same since.  Obviously I have grieved for all these years. She's never left me really.  She's with me all the time, I'm talking about her all the time, my friends all know about her, and my family, everybody knows about it.  'So now it would be lovely to have closure a bit late.  We've waited 44 years for this day and we just want this man named.  So that we can get closure for Helen.'

Police came to see the family to say that they thought Helen's death was murder.  'It was dreadful,' said Margaret, 'my son said he was coming down to see me, and it was such a shock and he said 'mom, it's murder'.  I've never been the same since'.

The new inquest was opened after a ruling in the High Court overturned the original 'open verdict' conclusion last year.  Sir was arrested in 2014 after the statements emerged during a cold case review in 2012, but claimed he had lied about murdering Helen.  Appearing in Birmingham coroner's court via video-link wearing a yellow t-shirt and glasses, he said he couldn't remember what happened because it was 'so long ago'.  'I only know what happened to Helen Bailey from what I heard or saw in the papers or whatever', he said.

'I remember being admitted to hospital in 1978 because I was feeling suicidal and I wanted somewhere to sort myself out.  I had taken quite a serious overdose. I recalled myself because of problems. And I wanted somewhere to sort myself out.  I confessed to the murder to make myself interesting to them. To ensure I got in.  I didn’t think wanting to kill myself or my wife was enough.  I can only say it was a coincidence [that my confessions were consistent with later post mortem findings].'

Asked if he was responsible for Helen’s death, he answered: 'No.'

When asked if he could provide any information as to how Helen came by her death, he said: 'No.'

When asked if he owned a penknife at the time he paused and eventually said: 'I may have owned a penknife, as I go fishing, but it would have been in with my fishing tackle.'

The inquest heard Sir made three confessions to the murder while undergoing psychiatric treatment at Highcroft Hospital, in Birmingham.  A post mortem examination carried out by pathologist Dr Nathaniel Cary in 2012 showed she had been strangled prior to her throat being cut.  This is a feature of Helen’s death which the original pathologist missed, the inquest heard.  The inquest heard Sir, now 72, admitted strangling Helen before cutting her neck with a penknife as she was still breathing to medical staff.  Detective Chief Superintendent Caroline Marsh said: 'I have no doubt in my mind. I believe the perpetrator was Kenneth Etchells [Sir] and there are no outstanding suspects in this inquiry.  Etchells/Sir described to medical staff how he killed Helen by strangling her and then cut her throat with a pen knife when he realised she was still breathing.'

Helen’s mother Margaret Bailey, who attended the hearing, said in a video interview played to the court: 'I just want closure.  I would like to think I can finish my life and know justice has been done for Helen.'

The inquest heard Sir attacked his mother in 1991 with a hammer. She never recovered and died months later from pneumonia.

44 years of pain: How the Little Girl Blue case unfolded over the decades after she was found with her throat cut in a woodland

11 August 1975 Father finds his daughter's body in woodland in Birmingham near the M6 motorway. He stays with the body for three hours so that he could be there to identify her when the coroner arrived, an experience which 'tormented' him for the rest of his life.

1976 An inquest returns an 'open verdict' and says her death may have been the result of an 'accidental joke gone wrong'. Her father and brother refused to believe the conclusion.

1978 & 1979 - John Sir confesses to the murder three times while at Highcroft hospital. He gives facts which are 'entirely consistent' with her killing. Two innocent boys are also wrongly accused of her murder

2014 - The cold case is re-opened after a pathologist re-examines post-mortem photos and says she had deep cuts in her neck and that there are clear signs of asphyxiation. John Sir's confessions also come to light

2018 - The High Court overturns the previous conclusion of the inquest and orders a new one to be carried out

2019 - The coroner rules that she was killed by 'unlawful killing' and says she will write to the CPS to ask them to re-open the case. John Sir tells the court that he made up his confessions in order to get into the hospital. West Midlands police say they are hopeful they can bring her killer to justice

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]